Community property is a chain company. In order to investigate the service quality of community property, the head office called a third-party company to conduct a satisfaction survey. The first time I received a phone call, I was shocked, and the investigator reported my information accurately. After checking the information, start the satisfaction survey.
I doubt this practice of the property company. Is our information given to others? Just as the property company called to ask about the service satisfaction survey, I explained my doubts and why we gave our information to others. The property replied that they had signed a contract with a third-party service company. If the information was leaked, the third-party company would pay compensation.
The property company benefits from disclosing the information of our owners? The property company must not expect our information to be disclosed earlier!
Students of a university in China illegally obtained information about their graduates. They learned from Zuckerberg's campus intranet and evaluated them online. This is not what it used to be. A university called the police, and the police found the suspect Ma. According to the news, Ma may be legally responsible.
In terms of this incident, Ma's illegal access to information is an illegal and criminal activity; From the perspective of graduates whose information has been leaked, they have no "legal responsibility" with Ma. When their information is put in the school, the school has the obligation to protect the students' information. When the information is illegally obtained, a school has not fulfilled the responsibility of protection, let alone should not transfer the responsibility to Ma.
In the case of the theft of student information, it is the graduates who have suffered "losses". How can they compensate for their losses?
There are many similar things. For example, the current delivery service. The food deliveryman is most afraid of being complained about for being late. The complaint is that money will be deducted. However, the consumer did not benefit from not receiving the delivery order in time after complaining about the deliveryman, and it is strange that the consumer complained about the food deliveryman rather than the platform. The problem that the consumer ignored is that the platform, not the food deliveryman, has a contractual relationship with you.
A domestic online shopping website has been testing drone delivery for some time. Not to mention whether it can be realized, if a machine is really used to replace the courier, then all the problems in the delivery will be complained to the platform, which is really enough to drink a pot.
