One year after the release of ChatGPT, can we no longer live without it?

Today, let's talk about a product that may not be at the top of the flow - ChatGPT, because on November 30, 2022, the ChatGPT under OpenAI will be exactly 1 year old. At that time, I still remember that less than a week after its launch, the number of users has exceeded 1 million, and its popularity is second to none in the world.

At that time, I also tested the selection of digital home appliances for the sake of heat, but to be honest, it was so lame that I classified it as "artificial intellectual disability". But this year, ChatGPT is constantly learning and making progress. At present, it also has many desirable achievements. I found several typical examples around the world to show you. Finally, I will test how smart ChatGPT is now.

What contribution has ChatGPT made to netizens in one year?

First of all, a foreign netizen @ AchillesFirstStand claimed that he lacked work experience. He wrote a cover letter and resume with ChatGPT and got very good feedback. He not only successfully entered the job, but also used ChatGPT quarterly summary report. Not only has the efficiency been improved, but also he has received the favor of the boss. It can be said that ChatGPT has provided great help for his work, I hope your boss doesn't know about it.

Another netizen @ ProbabyAI tried to communicate with ChatGPT because he suffered from bipolar affective disorder (manic depressive disorder). ChatGPT responded to the netizen's troubles by giving comfort, positive suggestions and solutions. The netizen also said that although it can not solve all my problems and the suggestions may not always be effective, sometimes I just need a voice to offset my own negative prejudice. In this way, ChatGPT is still of great value.

Next, a foreign netizen, @ Cairnebor, had a disagreement when buying a technology product because of its failure. In order to negotiate better, the netizen consulted ChatGPT about how to safeguard its rights. As a result, ChatGPT provided many real cases and solutions, and finally won a huge discount in the lawsuit, The user spent only $20.

In addition, ChatGPT will also store a real-time database to help diabetics monitor their condition, that is, to complete a lot of work with auxiliary programming, which is a matter of great merit. Of course, I have said so much. What I am most curious about is whether he has made progress in selecting products. Let's take a look.

Is it progress? Or sophistry?

I believe many old friends know how unreliable ChatGPT used to be, and many problems have fundamental errors. But now, whether there is a new look after the update iteration, let's test it.

First of all, it is an old question. Last time, we answered the old direction question of electronic products, but the answer was not quite comprehensive. This time, there was no difference from the last time (is this no progress), but the size, price, function, intelligence, shopping precautions and other contents were completely given, which is not much different from the basic knowledge of shopping.

The next step is the process of brand selection, which is no different from the previous one. Neutral recommendation, no subjective emotion, has been relatively comprehensive, but there is still no progress. This strange atmosphere reminds us of the previous test, which will not be completely the same as before, right? Don't you fish in muddy waters? So the next test will be the same as before?

With this doubt, I tested its effect on the comparison between product models, and the result was as expected. The degree of crotch pulling was the same as before. Several basic mistakes were not avoided, First of all, the resolution of both products is 4K, not 8K. Second, the 55V8G display technology is the local dimming (local dimming) hundred level zoning technology, which can achieve fine light control and more delicate light and dark details processing. Compared with the 55V8G display technology, it is more mature. Third, the price of 55V8G is better than 55S11, and the results are opposite.

I wanted to test its ability of confrontation and debate as well as its ability to think about user conversations. It is unnecessary to look at this. Maybe the case analyzed by netizens above is true, but it does not affect our use results in any way.

Write at the end:

Finally, perhaps the above successful Amway shows that ChatGPT has made great contributions in its field, but the dimension of first choice seems to remain in a childish state. In fact, the training model based on ChatGPT should not have made no progress at all. It may take time. It may take another year, two years or more, but it is still a question mark for users.

This article is an original article. If it is reproduced, please indicate the source: One year after the release of ChatGPT, can we no longer live without it? https://jd.zol.com.cn/846/8463630.html