Which is better, True Q3 Pro or Red Rice Note 13 Pro+

E-commerce quotation comparison

Performance comparison

CPU
annotation

CPU model:

CPU series model refers to that CPU manufacturers will determine a series model for CPU products belonging to the same series according to the market positioning of CPU products to facilitate differentiation and management. Generally speaking, the series model can be said to be an important identification for distinguishing CPU performance

The higher the score of Anthare test, the more perfect the operation of large games View the performance ladder diagram>

MediaTek Tianji 1100

CPU frequency

2.6Ghz A78*4+2.0GHz A55*4

MediaTek Tianji 7200 Ultra

CPU frequency

Up to 2.8GHz

Transportation and storage

Different RAM has different ability and fluency to run large software View the inventory ranking (3DMark)>

True me Q3 Pro (8GB/128GB/All Netcom/5G Version)

Below 4G

Large software operation is stuck

4G-8G

Large software runs smoothly

Above 8G

Large software runs very fast

8GB

Redmi Note 13 Pro+(12GB/256GB)

Below 4G

Large software operation is stuck

4G-8G

Large software runs smoothly

Above 8G

Large software runs very fast

12GB

Screen contrast
annotation

Screen proportion:

Represents the relative ratio of the screen area to the front panel area of the phone.


Pixel density:

This represents the number of pixels per inch. Therefore, the higher the PPI value, the higher the density of the display screen. Of course, the higher the display density, the higher the fidelity.

View Appearance>
6.43 in Screen size Typing with both hands 91.7% Screen proportion Full screen 415ppi Pixel density The greater the density, the richer the details
View Appearance>
6.67 in Screen size Typing with both hands Screen proportion Pixel density The greater the density, the richer the details

Camera comparison

front camera

16 million pixels
Low pixel

(0-500)

Medium pixel

(500-1200)

High pixel

(More than 12 million)

16 million pixels
Low pixel

(0-500)

Medium pixel

(500-1200)

High pixel

(More than 12 million)

Rear camera

64 megapixel

High pixel

20000 pixels

Low pixel

Recommended population

 Game users

Game users

 Business users

Business users

Redmi Note 13 Pro+(12GB/256GB)

 Female users

Female users

 Comprehensive performance

Comprehensive performance

True me Q3 Pro (8GB/128GB/All Netcom/5G Version)

Redmi Note 13 Pro+(12GB/256GB)

Word of mouth comparison

True me Q3 Pro (8GB/128GB/All Netcom/5G Version): 8.6 points
Defeat 82.93% mobile phones 490 people participated in the review>
Redmi Note 13 Pro+(12GB/256GB): 9.8 points
Defeat 93.65% mobile phones 3312 people participated in comments>

No comment overview

Go to comment>
True me Q3 Pro (8GB/128GB/All Netcom/5G Version)
Redmi Note 13 Pro+(12GB/256GB)
Support him Support him
ticket
ticket
Number of votes

Recommended comparison

Must read for purchase

Trend "Firefly" Hits: Realme Q3 Pro Mobile Phone Evaluation

Realme mobile phones officially launched the new Realme Q3 series mobile phones on April 22. As a cost-effective mobile phone for young users, realme Q3 series has extremely strong hardware performance [ read the whole passage ]

[Slow hands] Start with Snapdragon 8 Gen2 mobile phone for 2123 yuan! Really, GT Neo6 offers

Genuine GT Neo6: flagship core. The biggest selling point of this phone without dual screen is its third generation Snapdragon 8s flagship core. This is a powerful processor that allows you to play games and watch videos smoothly without any problems. Meanwhile, this [ read the whole passage ]

[According to the image retrieval machine] The difference is 800 yuan. How to choose the three Redmi Note13?

There are three Redmi Note13 series, Redmi Note13、Redmi Note13 Pro、Redmi Note13 Pro+, Although the three mobile phones are a series, the price difference [ read the whole passage ]

This red rice is not cost-effective. Why would I pay for it?

Last month, Hongmi brought the new Redmi Note 13 Pro+in the Redmi Note series, but many netizens said that the configuration of the Note 13 Pro+was in the price range of around 2000, which was not cost-effective [ read the whole passage ]

Product forum post
Product Q&A