-
Product type: 4K display, LED display, eye protection display Product positioning: Design graphics Screen size: 32 inches Panel type: IPS Optimal resolution: 3840x2160 Viewing angle: 178/178° Video interface: HDMI×4,Displayport1.2 Base function: Tilt: - 5-23 °, horizontal rotation: - 60 ° - 60 >>
-
TOPSKYS ATW20 computer bracket ¥849 Scaling selection ROHS certification -
TOPSKYS TS732E Display Bracket ¥999 Horizontal adjustment Tilt adjustment -
TOPSKYS AUW10 wall mounted curved screen display bracket ¥899 Curved screen Mechanical spring -
TOPSKYS TS744 Display Bracket ¥1899 Multi screen support Free adjustment -
TOPSKYS TS012 computer bracket ¥799 Double screen Diversified office
configuration parameter
Product model
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASUS ProArt Creative Country PA279CV Monitor Evaluation: A Good Helper for Creators
You need this in your later stage - ASUS PA32UC professional monitor evaluation
Apple Kneeling and Licking Didn't Use ASUS 32 "4K High Score IPS First Test
2560 high score to low price, wide perspective, what kind of products are suitable for you
Asustek Dell's 27 inch high score PK for the price difference of 2000 yuan
Popular configuration saving list
Luxury fever type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphic audio visual type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luxury fever type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's comment
-
4-5 stars -
3 - 4 stars -
2 - 3 stars -
1-2 stars
-
Very good performance (124) -
High cost performance (37) -
Affordable price (35) -
Beautiful appearance (23) -
Comfortable feel (9) -
Complete interfaces (8) -
Fine screen effect (5) -
Slightly expensive (59) -
Ordinary appearance (15) -
Low cost performance (3)
-
hxylkj Very confused six advantage: Everyone said Disadvantages: ASUS PA238Q parameter, color gamut: 72%, but it is said in the evaluation that ASUS PA238Q color range basically covers the sRGB space. Isn't this evaluation result contradictory to the parameter color gamut 72%??? Black and white response time: 6ms, how many ms is the grayscale response time??? Is the high color gamut only suitable for drawing and office work, and does it not significantly improve the quality and color of films and games??? No one mentioned the light leakage problem. Is there no light leakage problem with this monitor??? Summary: I feel that the parameters are average and the evaluation is average, but everyone's comments are very good, so I can't understand them. In a word, after reading all the evaluations, comments and parameters, I am more confused and there are many contradictions. Published on: October 23, 2013 16 likes 3 comments -
sagwesge High cost performance, satisfactory results ten advantage: High cost performance, excellent color performance, very consistent with the design. Disadvantages: It feels a bit heavy when looking at the fuselage Summary: The performance of the display dedicated to design and drawing is really not easy to talk about Published on: 2014-05-13 10 likes 2 comments -
sybis87z Purchase information Price: 3200 yuan Time: November 2013 Location: Chongqing ASUS PA248Q is good for me. Not very useful seven point one effect: six Size: six appearance: eight Panel: eight Base: ten cost performance: six advantage: Use and watch movies. The color restoration effect of drawing is good. And as a professional drawing, the function keys are really powerful Disadvantages: I feel my glasses ache when I take this monitor to type. uncomfortable. Playing games is not bad. Summary: I like doing text editing. It is not recommended to edit text. If it is drawing. I won't do that either. Don't talk nonsense Published on: November 9, 2019 2 likes comment
Let's talk together
-
A If no one answers this question, they will have the opportunity to be accepted and rewarded accordingly. Let me answer
Product comparison
-
Samsung C49HG90DMC ¥9999 PK in progress -
Sony INZONE M9 ¥6999 PK in progress -
EIZO PROMINENCE CG3145 RMB 460000 PK in progress -
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX ¥26999 PK in progress -
Philips 279M1RVE ¥7999 PK in progress