Canon 100D white limited edition machine (40mm)

The body of the SLR, the weight of the SLR, and the ability to use the full range of EF bayonet lenses are amazing. No need to add additional lenses and adapter rings. The optical viewfinder is much more convenient than the screen view of the SLR. It is completely a part of the SLR

Maybe it's because of its small size. The grip is average. It's beautiful in white but not resistant to dirt. It's inconvenient without an independent aperture dial. The touch screen is often touched by mistake. The focus system of the low-end computer+the 18 million CMOS inherited by the factory can hardly show sincerity

Maybe it was Weidan who couldn't hold up his head in front of Dafa, but also wanted to recover some weight sensitive users. In order to attract the attention of female users, it also made an exception to launch white. So the publicity focuses on the female machine, which is really a bit of a hole. I like whether this machine will be sprayed? Well, seriously, if you want to be light and portable, but also want the performance of SLR, 100D is definitely your best choice. And if your main machine and lens group are Canon, then you should choose 100D, which saves the investment of lens, does not need the adapter ring, and you do not need to learn the operation again, but also can maintain the performance of SLR. Why not do it? Now most micro units do not have viewfinder. The disadvantage of screen shooting is that it will be more painful when you shoot outdoors. When the light is strong, it is difficult to use screen shooting, which interferes with your shooting. 100D allows you to devote yourself to shooting Now the most fortunate thing is that I didn't buy EOS-M The above is just my personal experience, for your reference

I started with 100D. Before starting, I experienced 600D, 650D, 700D in the experience store, as well as D3200, D5100, D5200. I'm not a photography enthusiast. I haven't used any SLR before starting with 100D. I can't say anything about the specific operation, and I'm not qualified to comment. As for the picture quality, I only compare it with Canon's. Because of the basic configuration, there is no difference between 600D and 650D (the 600D processor is the previous generation). When I compare the pictures I took with those in ZOL's evaluation, I feel that there is no difference. But 100D's real-time view taking and focusing speed is very fast. I am a consumer DC, and I don't like to take pictures of Cyclops, Therefore, we attach great importance to the focusing speed of real-time SLR LCD viewing, 600D, 650D, 700D, as well as the 3200D, 5100D, 5200D of the dead end. In real-time viewing, free movement of multiple single points or free movement of multiple multiple points are all bellows, not as good as EOS M! 700D is better (of course, the fast mode focusing of these cameras is the same). Under 100D real-time shooting conditions, the speed of free moving multi-point focusing and free moving single point focusing is very fast, even faster than Sony's 3N. Under real-time shooting conditions, the capture speed is first-class. Again, I'm talking about the real-time shooting of the SLR LCD screen. Do not spray your own weight!

This is the first SLR. I use the automatic mode of the machine. I have never used the SLR before. I don't know anything about manual SLR, so I don't know what the disadvantages are~~

The picture quality is much better than that of my Kodak DC, which has been used for 5 years. As for the comparison with Weidan, I don't know. I never used Weidan! Real time shooting is quick and crisp!