Nikon D90 (single machine)

1. Many function keys are on the machine, which is convenient and practical. 2. The menu level is clear, and you can quickly adapt to it even if you haven't used Nikon 3. For non professional users, the imaging quality is satisfactory. 4, 18-105, which is quite good in terms of cost performance. 5. The reliability of D90 for general shooting and creation is very reassuring 6. ISO is a data. How many people will use ISO1600 to produce films? ISO 800 is sufficient 7. High pixels are also data. How many people enlarge the 30 inch image? Pixel 1200W is enough 8. How many people use high-speed continuous shooting? Are you a sports reporter? Is the probability high? It's still data. 4/S is sufficient 9. Most of the cameras are obsolete. Maybe many of the functions in the camera have not been used. I don't know what they are for The above 6, 7 and 8 are the things that businesses fool consumers. Don't be fooled by these data when buying cameras

1. Non metal body. 2. The lens interface of the machine is plastic. There is a little less focus at 3 and 11 o'clock, but it is enough in most cases. 4. The camera is optional. It doesn't matter if you put it on the SLR as a gadget. 5. ISO starts from 100, and expands to 50-80. 6. It is absolutely affordable.

1. The price performance ratio is still very high, at least more than the three digit computers of C, including the 550D, which is not as good as the D90. I have used both C and N, which is very objective. The 500D has no use in the last red circle. I can't see the difference between it and the sleeve head, but the difference is that the D90 has a gold circle head, so you can see the difference between it and the sleeve head. The 3-digit computer of Family C is not as good as the entry-level computer of Family N. The SLR is a simple way to distinguish between two models with the same price and function. You can't decide who to choose! It depends on the weight Home N is a camera maker, and home C is an advertiser. 2. The D90 for entry-level and non professional users can absolutely meet the needs. In most cases, its availability is 90%, as reliable as its name. 3. Read the manual more, surf the Internet more, shoot more, think more, and you can know why the SLR film is a little gray, which is reasonable. It can be solved in the camera settings, avoiding late adjustment for lazy people. In terms of cost performance, D90 is reliable, reliable and worth buying and using.

I have used 450D+18-55IS+501.8 before. 50D+A16+501.8+17-40L。 On the whole, a lot of energy and financial resources have been spent. In the second half of the year, we went out in one breath, and now we have Nikon D90 (purchased by JD) to talk about our feelings: 1. The D90 has a good feel, which is worse than the 50D, but it is much better than all Canon entry-level machines (no matter high or new). It's firm to hold. 2. I feel that Nikon is very kind. Each machine has a screen cover. Small pieces are very powerful and impressive. The lens is basically equipped with a hood, which is also good. 3. Nikon's equipment is generous, and a lens bag is attached to the machine, which is really generous. Surprise. 4. The photography is good, and the aperture is well matched. The film is quite sharp! It is often said that Nikon takes pictures of landscapes and Canon takes portraits. However, the portraits taken by Nichias are also good. The details should be determined by the lens strength, and cannot be generalized. 5. I am not an equipment party, but I like taking pictures very much. Although the D90 camera is chicken ribs, it is quite useful at critical times. Although it can't focus automatically, it is also very interesting to use it manually. It has a clear sense of propulsion. (The feeling of blockbuster is exaggerated, ha ha) This is actually meaningless. 6. The various settings in the style are very complete, which can be operated on the PS machine, but rarely used, but practical.

Disadvantages: 1. The SD card used is not very professional (just feeling). I like the CF card, but the card is expensive. 2. In setting, sometimes it is necessary to return to the menu to operate the focusing mode (focusing). A few functions on the shoulder screen cannot be directly operated, which may be affected by the 50D large turntable. But I feel that there are some minor deficiencies. 3. The focusing system feels different from Canon's style. I may have been used to focusing at home C, but I am still exploring and learning slowly.

PS: Equipment is a hobby of each family. It doesn't mean to criticize others, but only for their own feelings.

The original midrange player is excellent in every aspect, and its battery life is excellent

The high sensitivity is too poor. After 800, it is almost unbearable. Pixels are not even comparable to mobile phones

I don't know how many years I can keep going