-
Sensor: Full frame (35.8 * 23.9mm) Effective pixels: 24 million 300 thousand Display screen size: 3 inches Display pixels: 1.23 megapixel LCD screen Continuous shooting speed: Support (up to 5/s) Shutter speed: 30-1/8000 seconds, 1/4-1/8000 during video shooting >> Battery type: Lithium battery (NP-FW50) Endurance: About 270 sheets (viewfinder), about 350 sheets (LCD)
configuration parameter
Product model
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the same budget, which one should choose Canon 6DII or Sony A7II?
Extreme Perspective Cool Photography Record Dou Xiao Takes You Through New Zealand
Small improvement brings great improvement to Sony Microorder ™ A7II evaluation
Smaller and higher definition camera development trend in 2015
One week's hot news review micro single enters the 4K and high pixel era
Let's comment
-
4-5 stars -
3 - 4 stars -
2 - 3 stars -
1-2 stars
-
Excellent picture quality (4) -
The price is not too expensive (2) -
Good handle (2) -
High cost performance (2) -
Good video effect (1) -
Color reality (1) -
Good resolution (1) -
Poor hand feel (1) -
Poor hand feel (1) -
Slightly expensive (1)
-
porschewe Purchase information Location: Xi'an essence Excellent workmanship, except that the SD card slot cover is not tight enough nine point two Workmanship: eight Imaging: eight Screen: eight Battery: eight Operation: ten cost performance: eight advantage: The workmanship and imaging quality are excellent. The shortcut key settings are easy to use and easy to use. Disadvantages: The SD card slot door shakes, and the battery compartment door seems to be poorly sealed. When it is closed, the small blue lock of the battery can be seen. The screw antirust paint has been used for two weeks, and then it falls off. Of course, the flaws do not cover the flaws. Summary: At the beginning, I always thought that Weidan might not be as convenient as the traditional silly big black thick. I bought it for a month, took it to Hokkaido, and dried many films at minus 20 ℃. The A7ii resisted the crazy automatic shutdown of the mobile phone. The automatic correction function of angular distortion of the endoscope is good, and the optical zoom is available, so 24 to 70 heads are enough at once. I am very satisfied with the performance and choice of A7ii. Published on: 2017-02-16 530 likes 8 comments -
j***t ten Summary: The 7D of the company and the 5D3 of the colleague have tried. The machine is really good, but the weight is really awkward. Sony's new A7 II has basically improved some of the shortcomings of the previous generation. Although the weight has slightly increased, the five axle anti shake, metal body and metal integrated buckle are all good changes. Small size and good picture quality are the advantages of Sony Micro Sing. To be honest, the camera is less and the game is more thorough. Now this product is a new product, so the price is a little expensive at present, but on the whole, A7 II is still worth buying by non professionals. Published on: June 22, 2017 fabulous comment -
A dead keyboard dog Purchase information Price: 7000 yuan Location: Nanning Very powerful full frame nine point four Workmanship: ten Imaging: ten Screen: eight Battery: six Operation: ten cost performance: ten advantage: 1. You can use half frame format or half frame lens. 2. Light, inexpensive. 3. Five axis anti shake, no anti shake for the lens, no problem about 1/20s at the 200mm end. It is better if the lens is also anti shake. 4. Real time shooting, the normal light down parameter display screen can see what kind of shot is much faster than the SLR, which is also the reason why I gave up the SLR and chose Micro SLR. 5. There are more keys and 4 user-defined keys. 6. Turning the focusing ring is convenient for zooming in and focusing. Disadvantages: Continuous shooting and focusing are common. Real time shooting is different from the SLR in the case of abnormal light. Sony lenses are too few and expensive. The high sense is not as powerful as imagined. There is no touch screen and 4D focusing Summary: There is no one of the best choices in the full frame for non-commercial purposes. You can use a half lens, which can take real-time shots. Five axis anti shake, light, inexpensive, and can kill all full frame SLRs of the same level. It would be perfect if there were silent shutter, 4D focusing, and full screen focusing. Now we are using a small white sharpness that is too poor to even get a clear picture of the frost on the tomato. We are going to use Nikon 70-300 small donkey cannon and Shima 501.4 old style. Rational consumption rejects vanity and intellectual disability. Published on: 2018-12-07 17 likes comment
Let's talk together
-
Q How about the sony a73? Is the sony a73 worth buying? How about the price performance of sony a73? A The price will be much more expensive. If it is increased, please refer to a7r3, which may not be very big (a7r3 mainly fixes the complaints of users of a7r2). See [Detailed] -
Q How do you choose Sony a7r3 and Accent 5d4 when you want to enter the handheld SLR of the Double 11? A Choose one from two and recommend Canon 5D4. You can buy 5D3 under tight budget! The performance is almost the same. For example, the focus hasn't improved when taking pictures of children. Canon [Detailed]
-
A For shooting scenes and starry sky, choose D810. 1) One is the affordable price, which has basically reached the end. 2) Tolerance is better, for shooting [Detailed] -
A The building owner can rest assured that the camera lens of the camera is relatively wear-resistant and can be cleaned by using a soft eyeglass cloth.
Product comparison
-
Canon EOS R7 ¥8999 PK in progress -
Canon EOS RP ¥7599 PK in progress -
Nikon Z5 ¥9099 PK in progress -
Sony A6400 (stand-alone) ¥6899 PK in progress -
Sony A6000 ¥5598 PK in progress