Sony A5000

Small, low-key, such a small body, such a large bottom. Of course, the rx1 base is larger and smaller, but the price is 10 times. The picture quality is good, cheap and cost-effective. The picture quality is not good, and there is no way to talk about it later. The picture quality is not different from 6000, at least you can't see it with the naked eye. Iso3600 is too reluctant, unnecessary iso1600 is acceptable.

Focusing is a little slow, but I always play with manual head, which can be ignored. There are few keys, and the manual head can't use many keys, which is not a big disadvantage. It's too small. The model thinks you are taking pictures of her with a card machine, and doesn't give her a look.

A good machine, if you don't want to use it in the full picture, 6000 (local tyrants buy it at random, who call me a poor loser), 5000 in the full picture, and 5000 in the full picture, you can still use it as a standby machine, because the full picture body and lens will no longer be considered as simple, not suitable for carrying at any time, and taking photos at any time. It's cost-effective. Look at the picture... Although there are late stage, it's not my fault. You can't be late stage is your fault. If I bought you a flagship machine, I can only watch late stage movies and spit blood.

1. Very good high feeling. There is basically no impatience at 3200 when the light is poor 2. It feels good. The right handle angle is very comfortable 3. Wifi is fast with mobile phones, and it is convenient to reverse photos 4. The lens has the function of manually adjusting the focal length, which is convenient to use. 5. Focus cannot be selected, and the effect of aperture priority virtualization is not good. 6. With automatic recognition function, it can distinguish between macro and wide-angle

1. Mode conversion depends on electronic screen selection. It is not as comfortable as direct wave wheel, and the reaction speed is slow 2. The software download needs to be registered. The registration page is not provided, and the computer operation is inconvenient. 3. The lens does not provide the function of retracting, and extends when the power is turned on.

High cost performance, good manual control performance, good lens imaging effect, high cost performance at about 2k.

1. As an entry machine, the image quality is good. The APS image is very good, and the quality of the photos taken is very high. That's enough. It's much better than a card machine. 2. Can send photos directly to mobile phones. 3. The design is very scientific, and the weight and size are the smallest in the micro list,

The display screen is not high-definition, and it is a little troublesome not to touch the screen. There is no convenient and intuitive control dial on the fuselage, and it is inconvenient to switch scenes by entering the menu.

Overall, I felt it was pretty good, cheap and good quality. Small and convenient, the photo is very clear.