Canon XC10

The picture quality of photography can really beat Sony's apx35. It is said that this is because the lens is a red circle lens. In particular, the portrait does not have the problem of Sony's yellow color. Compared with Sony, the picture quality has better exposure in dark details, and the portrait is more beautiful. The anti shake performance, tracking and continuous focusing are very powerful, which is really much better than Sony's apx35

It is not as simple as Sony's operation, and is more inclined to professional camera operation. Many of them cannot be used. The workmanship is not as good as Sony's, and the cost performance ratio is too low. I have been struggling with Sony's RX10II before. Later, I found that the machine is really not suitable for taking portraits. When I tried the machine in the exclusive store, the shit yellow came out. If Sony doesn't win, it is estimated that the camera will be the world of Canon in the future. Although you pay for goods, your price is really too high. Japanese goods are deceptive. Compared with Sony's RX10III, Sony will lose. But Sony's RX10II is the one with limited funds. Or wait two years to start. There is no need to hit the gun

Canon's camera has really taken efforts, but few people have realized it so far, so no one dares to try Canon. On the whole, this machine is not generally good. The imaging quality is extremely high, to the point of complete second killing. I also saw the evaluation of Canon XC10 vs. Sony RX10III on the Internet before and finally started with determination. The pity is that the cost performance ratio is too low. I suggest you be patient and wait until about 8000 or less. I like street photography in summer

Small and convenient for traveling

The utility value is small and so expensive that it is not worth investing.

Canon's cameras are not easy to sell. The camera can only be small and light if it is changed into a camera, but the camera is unstable and poor. It is difficult for people with stable hands to keep the picture from shaking but rely on the tripod, which is not so convenient. But small and light family travel is very convenient, but the price is not bad! Professionals will not choose such products.

There is nothing to say, ordinary telephoto machine

Poor workmanship, pure plastic body, poor design, but the rotatable handle is not locked. The lens always hangs down when holding the camera. As a news machine, it can't shoot raw. The picture quality is poor. One inch of small bottom, 10 times of large zoom lens, the picture quality is very fleshy. When Canon released it, it blew it into the sky, and the reality snapped it on the ground

There is nothing to say. Don't buy, don't buy, don't buy. Please consider 5d3 with this budget