Lenovo VIBE Z (K910/Unicom version)

Qualcomm 800 has strong performance. 1300W pixels+1.8 large aperture pixels must be powerful. Double cards and double stays are great. The battery capacity is also sufficient.

Pricing is too high. You should know that the minimum configuration of the Jinli E7 is 2699, and its pixel is 1600W. Although the above configurations are excellent, they are not flagship at present. In addition, when you go public, there are many configurations like this, although they can't be found all over the street. The price of 3698 overestimates the strength of this mobile phone.

Generally speaking, mobile phones are very practical, but the cost performance ratio is too low. Give Lenovo some more suggestions. Your unchanging appearance really needs to be changed Lenovo is the pride of China. I hope you can be as powerful as computers in mobile phones.

The screen is large and clear, with a high proportion of screens. I don't think the phone is too big. The brightness is sensitive to automatic adjustment, and it can be clear and bright in the sun. The mobile phone has a beautiful appearance and is thin and light. It's very comfortable to hold. The battery is enough. I usually use more than 30 phones every day, reading novels, reading news, listening to music, and charging every two days. Both the dual card signal and the call quality are good. I didn't see what was said on the Internet. It took nearly two weeks, and everything was normal. The built-in music is also very safe. It is basically easy to use without root. The dual card and dual channel are very powerful, and Lenovo is very generous.

The focus of the camera is really a problem, but the effect is still very good when the camera is properly focused.

It's very good. It's also very good compared with other brands. The appearance of the phone and the design of virtual keys are very consistent with my aesthetic and usage habits. As for brands, be rational. All brands have good products, but also bad ones. Anyway, it's good to use them comfortably. Now the price performance ratio is very high.

The hardware configuration is quite strong.

The design is too general and doesn't pay attention to details. The front panel is too vulgar, and the back cover should be made into an integrated system instead of a two-stage system. The shiny metal in the lower section is too ugly. The camera part is still convex like that, which is really ugly.

The next generation must improve, and pay attention to details in order to be high-end.