Cheap, 1:2 quasi macro is enough for 50mm lens.Full aperture is available, with sharp image quality and full color.Although there is no USM, the motor is not noisy.The focusing distance window and magnification scale are all available, and the workmanship is good.This shot was released in 1987. It has been 26 years since 2013, but it still shows excellent comprehensive quality.
Most dissatisfied
Slow focusing, heavy dark angle,
summary
A classic designed quasi macro lens with high cost performance
Fair workmanship, better than 5014 5018, very good picture quality, very smooth picture.It's good to shoot portraits and flowers. It was too heavy to shoot flowers with 180L before.This is very light.
Most dissatisfied
Old motor, a little noisy, that's all.
summary
Compared with the 5014 lens, the aperture is small. If both are set to F4, shoot.The picture quality is about the same.However, the 5014 cannot be folded too close.
Just entered a small distance.This head is really good!For amateurs, it is almost omnipotent (except for telephoto), that is, it can take macro shots (although the magnification is 0.5, it is enough for amateurs), landscapes and portraits!Generally, the focusing speed is 0.52 seconds, and the color is restored well.Although the mirror body is metal, it is still relatively light, which is convenient for travel!High cost performance ratio (I found that the score of this lens was very high on the Shadows Wuji forum, so I bought one, which was really good)
Most dissatisfied
It's not an ultrasonic motor. The focusing sound is a little loud. Focusing is slow when shooting at macro!However, speaking of it, the price is already very good!
summary
The head can be used as both a head and a macro head (although the magnification is 0.5, it is enough for amateur photographers). It can shoot both landscapes and portraits!Generally, the focusing speed is 0.52 seconds, the color is restored well, and the sharpness is better than the general header!
The entry head of macro can also be used as the head to hang up, portrait, scenery, and macro.It is a gift for people whose pockets are not bulging.
Most dissatisfied
The performance of portrait, scenery and macro is very ordinary, and it is impossible to be excellent alone.
summary
The price is not high, and it is as versatile as the all-purpose oil. Don't expect its single item to be outstanding.In terms of performance and price, it is still full value.
The price is cheap, and you can barely use it for indoor non close shooting.Small objects cannot be photographed clearly.
Most dissatisfied
Recently, the focusing distance must be more than 230mm before shooting. If you enlarge the picture and cut it again, it will be horribleTherefore, the diamond on the diamond ring is photographed. Even if the picture is turned to the largest size recently, the subject only occupies a small part of the picture. If the enlarged picture is cut and blurred, the aperture is still turned to the smallest size and the tripod is still unable to achieve clear shooting. I bought it on September 8 under the guidance of the sales staff of Canon H2C006 in Shenzhen Huaqiang Plaza,The next day, this Canon authorized dealer wouldn't return it. I had to complain to the Administration for Industry and Commerce, and was waiting for the Administration for Industry and Commerce to deal with it.
summary
The after-sales service was poor. After less than 24 hours, they refused to return the goods, misleading consumers. The 500D lens bought at 2550 yuan was not as effective as the 300 yuan card machine.
All powerful head.Taking portraits can replace 50/1.8. The distance is moderate and the scenery is sharp enough.It can be used as a hanging head and is convenient to carry.A head worth keeping.
The sharpness is very high, the color is also very good. It is not USM. It cannot be manually operated all the time. The focus is slow, the motor sounds loud, and sometimes the focus is slightly off (it may be related to the equipped camera)
It is used for still life shooting. The hundred micro focal length is too large, and the depth of field is often insufficient. The aperture often has to be opened to F20, and it is not sharp enough above F20.I bought this one to make up for the shortcomings.I used it three times after I got it, and the depth of field under the same aperture is a little deeper than Baiwei, but not obvious enough.
It's really the leader of the small crowd. Jingdong hasn't bought many goods. When it sees the goods, it immediately places an order, and then it's out of stock. Hehe.The head gave a good evaluation on Wuji, so he entered.When I got it, the workmanship was relatively OK, but the old man was the old man, and there was still a certain lack of mechanical performance. Because of the macro distance, the focusing travel was relatively long, and manual work would be tiring, while automatic focusing was not very sensitive. In the case of insufficient contrast and light, the condition of the bellows was serious.The picture quality is not as good as expected, but it is much better than zoom
It's genuine!But when I bought the lens, I found a particle of dust in the front lens and the rear lens!Because it is not on the surface, it cannot be removed by itself!Focus ring automatic mode is very loose!The manual mode feels better!Because it is individual difference!Because I have used this lens before, I started!Because it is urgent, I found that there is no stock in the mall!There was no exchange.
The old man released in 1987 is still in production, which shows his extraordinary quality.Although the ratio cannot reach 1:1, it is generally used without problems.High cost performance.
It is light and convenient without a hood. The aperture is very sharp at 2.8. It seems that the virtual speed is not enough. It can be seen with TV mode 1/200 or faster. Focusing is fast and accurate when the object distance is more than one meter. The image field of small aperture is uniform and low distortion. F8 and 5014 are equivalent, which can be used as standard transformers.The dispersion can be seen under the large aperture and high contrast, not 1:1 (actually not a big problem). The focus travel is long when taking a close-up shot, and the sound is noisy (sharper than a small spittoon, like an electric drill). The focus is not graded, and it is not full time manual focus. In short, the cost performance ratio is good, and it can serve as standard change+micro distance.
