Comments on Nikon P900s

83 times zoom, 24-2000 focal length, and good macro. I accidentally found that I can focus even one or two centimeters away from the lens. Can take pictures of the moon and other distant objects. It's also good to be a telescope. It's a good tool to expand human vision.

The plastic feeling is serious. Focus on the "draw box" in low light“

Although I have Nikon D750 SLR. But I still bought the 83 times telephoto machine for the big zoom. It can take pictures of objects far away. Nikon's lens is very reliable. The workmanship is acceptable at this price. The control is much simpler than that of the SLR. Only those options are easy to adjust.

1. Ultra wide angle ultra long focus, excellent sharpness of full focus lens. 2. The aperture is large, and the color of the film returns to reality. 3. Double wave wheel professional operation, rich keys, simple menu operation convenient, wide handle light body convenient to hold.

Focus is not as fast as expected. The image quality of the maximum zoom magnification is affected. It seems that the aperture of the lens is a little small

The ultra long focal length is 24-2000, and the focal length for taking photos outside the door is fully covered. It is large and looks like a SLR.

Take everything from far to near, a necessary model for traveling!

It's still a little heavy. The workmanship should be a little more refined. It's really a good machine!

Although there is a gap between the image quality of near and far focus cameras and large frame cameras, if you just exchange views with yourself or friends, it is enough. This is the real one machine at hand, and you can go around the world! I played with various cameras, and finally used P900S as my personal camera for traveling and playing.

After starting, I tried it for a while. I felt it was worth it. The long focus imaging was good! The pictures taken at 1600 degrees in dark light are acceptable. The 2000mm ultra long focal lens is the only one, which is more than enough to shoot birds. The control is good.

The battery is too thin, the endurance is a little poor, it would be great if I could take more than 300 photos.

From 24 to 2000 mm, you can go all over the world. If you don't put more than 20 inches of photos, the general subject matter is enough and worth having.

The power of the equivalent focal length plus digital zoom is more than enough to shoot the moon, shoot the sister paper, shoot the distant view, and shoot the birds, but the light is good. In terms of the size of COMS and the commonly used ISO, the entry-level SLR 5 years ago is not comparable.

It's really not convenient to carry, but if you have a SLR on your hand, don't be too heavy. Don't be deceived by the official samples, which are processed in the later stage. As far as picture quality is concerned, it's OK to compare with mobile phones. After all, this is a long focus digital camera, not a SLR lens. The battery power is not enough, especially when turning on WiFi. The original power is very expensive. In theory, the hood cannot be installed. No hot boots.

For ordinary people who don't want to spend too much money and don't want to travel with a telephoto lens, the focal length of this machine is enough. Regardless of the picture quality, it can be directly obtained from the middle picture, and the product positioning is different. If you are used to playing with the card machine, you will feel that it is heavy. If you carry more than 3 kg of SLR every day, you will feel that it is too light. In short, it is the wrist "habit" problem. 1 set of SLR, ultra wide angle zoom, fixed focus head and P900S will go out without regret. The above is written according to their actual use, and the real machine is still on the way.

Large zoom, 6 ED mirrors, 67mm lens, the same as SLR, can be equipped with filters. The image quality is transparent when the light is good, and anti shake is powerful. The test shot at the air index of 54 can clearly see the logo, 60P, 1080 video shooting of Gree Air Conditioner at 500 meters is perfect. The optical zoom is equivalent to a 26 times telescope and does not need a tripod to shoot birds. Decisively withdraw the Startron ED bird watching mirror and start immediately.

The imaging sharpness of the long focus end is poor, especially in the distant view. Of course, this is related to the weather and hand shaking, but the outline of the object with a slight purple edge will be blurry, and there will be some noise, but the details of the object will still be reflected. At least 100 meters, 2000 focus can see people's nails clearly

3200 yuan. I never compare it with the single. I think the cost performance ratio is superior to that of shooting birds with a bird watching mirror.

Easy to carry, you can walk around the world in one mirror. The effect of 2000mm shooting is very ideal, with good color restoration.

Continuous shooting has time lag, and long exposure only lasts for 15 seconds.

When traveling in Japan, I bought a P900. The picture quality ranges from 24-2000mm and each focal section is good. The effect of 2000mm shooting is very ideal, which is better than that of 600mm plus 2-fold zoom lens.

Long Jiao Gaili, look at the moon I took myself

RAW is missing, and the machine is a bit damaged.

In fact, the telephoto machine does not need a 24mm wide angle at all. It is better to use 28 or 35.
If you think the CMOS is too small, then the birdwatching mirror is the right way to shoot. However, only 540mm focal length birdwatching mirror can be purchased at 2-3K.

Of course, it's abnormal telephoto

The size is a little big

As a household or bird watching and paparazzi user, it's worth more. Many people call the sensor small. Do you want to know that the full frame can give you 83 times the focus? Even so, can you afford it? Can you afford it? Don't compare this with SLR. The positioning is completely different! Some people ask whether it is better to buy this or an introductory SLR? I'm sure you can buy everything!

No advantages, the battery is durable

1. Although the zoom times are large, the volume is also large, especially the lens is heavier than other telephoto machines, the center of gravity is forward, and the handle is awkward
2. The image quality of the telephoto end is average, about 5 or 60 times better, and then it is average
3. Anti shake basic arm
4. The workmanship is average, and there are large gaps at the joints
5. No 3D photographing function

I originally bought it to replace my Sony HX300, but this machine has no absolute advantage. If you have Sony HX300, HX400, Canon SX60, which are 5 or 60 times more powerful, you don't need to replace this machine~

Large zoom ratio, strong anti shake.

1. No RAW format. Is it so difficult for the shoe factory to give a RAW? Without RAW, the picture quality has no great potential.
2. No hot boots. The internal flash will be blocked by the prominent lens, and the machine cannot install the set-top flash, that is, it can almost rely on natural light, and cannot effectively control the light.
3. Wide angle is insufficient (compared with competing products). The high magnification telephoto machine of many friends has a wide angle of 20mm and 21mm, while the machine has just reached 24. The difference between 24 and 21 is known to those who have taken films.
4. External filter is not allowed. The minimum aperture of the small bottom long focus machine is only F8, so many times long exposure must rely on ND filter, but the machine still cannot be connected to an external filter.
Others, such as small aperture, low screen and EVF specifications, are not disadvantages. Because this configuration in the high power telephoto is normal.

For those who don't understand the high power telephoto machine and only know how to shout about the small sensor, the comments can be ignored. High power telephoto machine like P900 should be judged by the standard of high power telephoto machine.
Although the zoom magnification of this machine is terrible, the shoe factory still fails to pay attention to the opinions and suggestions on the previous generations of products, which is just a huge magnification. It is estimated that this machine will lose out to competitors with smaller zoom times.

It feels that the 2000m telephoto is very powerful, and the image quality of bird and moon shooting is very good. The medium and close range image quality is also good.

In factory settings, the color is too rich and bright, and the skin of the portrait is too yellow. You need to find the saturation setting in the menu and reduce it by 1 gear.

Love to follow others to shoot birds. It's not good to shoot with a short camera focus. I always want to get a longer focus. A few days ago, I found that there was a P900S, with 83 times zoom, which was scary. I don't know whether the picture quality is good or not. Later, I checked the photos of Netizens first, which was good, so I started. After exploring and playing for more than 10 days, I feel that the 2000m telephoto is very powerful, and the image quality of bird and moon shooting is very sharp, and the image quality of mid shot and close shot is also good. Disadvantages: the color is too rich and bright in the factory settings, and the skin of the portrait is too yellow. Later, I found the saturation setting in the menu, and I reduced it by 1 gear.

There are new things for telephoto.

I haven't used it before. I don't know the root of it.

I'm sure I like it. It must taste good to play, but I wonder if it's more fun than Canon's SX60? This is the moon I took with SX60.

12000 mm long focal force, filter can be installed
2. As long as the air visibility is good, you can recognize people who are photographed at a distance of half a kilometer
3. Focus is OK, anti shake can really reach level 5, and the longest focal length is 1/50 seconds
4. The viewfinder automatically changes, and the auxiliary button is easy to use, so you can quickly find the target
5. The image quality in the small bottom camera is better than the average value
6. The battery can shoot 300+, which is durable

1. Large and heavy, comparable to SLR
2. There is no raw, and there are restrictions in the later stage
3. The shutter lag is slightly long, and it is difficult to shoot birds
4. The common fault of the small base machine is that the noise is severe, and the reduction to 500w pixels is normal
5. Under some light conditions, the automatic white balance is not accurate, and the color is weak

The effect of taking pictures of the moon is very good, and bird watching is also good. It is worth starting when it is reduced to less than 3000 yuan, which is equivalent to buying an astronomical telescope and giving away a camera

The telephoto is very good.

The telephoto performance is outstanding, the macro effect is also good, the shooting selection mode is diverse, the control is simple, and the appearance is grand.

Continuous shooting is delayed, so it is difficult to capture.

Overall, it is good. It takes everything from far to near. There is more than enough for household use.

This product is as big as the D7000 and weighs nearly one kilogram. It is so much bigger than the P600, but it is only the zoom enhanced version of the P600.

How about giving a RAW?

Camera, good color performance, excellent picture quality, soft color

It just can't focus manually. Average picture quality, small aperture

The image quality of each focus section is excellent, focusing is fast and anti shake is very effective!

I haven't found it yet

Very powerful machine! The picture quality of each focal section is excellent, and the anti shake is very powerful! Very satisfied---

It can meet the needs of ordinary users. The power of telephoto, shutter speed and image quality are improved. Anti shake is also OK!

Long focus section color deviation, no manual zoom, insufficient endurance, a bit too heavy, insufficient shutter speed,

The Nikon model should have a manual mechanical zoom. Unfortunately, the Nikon P series does not have any. Sony is very considerate in research and development, and it is very convenient to focus. Otherwise, zooming is too troublesome. Why doesn't Nikon learn from experience,
Generally speaking, it can be used by ordinary people. Don't ask too much. If the price is below 2500, it is worth consulting!