Comments on Pentax 645Z (55mm)

nine point eight
Comprehensive score
nine point six
cost performance
nine point six
operation
eight point nine
Battery
ten
screen
ten
imaging
ten
work
  • Product Comments (104)
  • With figure
  • With video

Most satisfied

Only Mamiya can compare with Japan in picture quality!

Most dissatisfied

Do top photographers care about continuous shooting? Do you care about the speed of focusing?

summary

Use this machine to take only one meaningful picture even one day! It's also successful!

Published at: 03:57, September 8, 2014 100 likes 3 comments

Most satisfied

Compared with the previous generation, it has a lot of iso improvements, and the overall performance has improved

Most dissatisfied

1/125s maximum flash synchronization speed, really hard injury.
Improving iso is also chicken ribs.

summary

645Z, what do you want me to love you with~

Published on: 03:51, May 13, 2014 48 likes 18 comments

Workmanship: ten Imaging: eight Screen: eight Battery: eight Operation: ten cost performance: six

Most satisfied

Pixel improvement is not equal to picture quality improvement.

Most dissatisfied

It's more expensive than 645D

summary

In terms of image quality, I think it is not as good as 654D.

Published on: 12:23, December 13, 2014 31 likes comment

Most satisfied

The solid body and sufficient materials are accompanied by a great increase in the weight of the body! But I just like the heavy feeling of holding it in my hand!

Most dissatisfied

The weight of the fuselage is 250/290/130 grams heavier than that of the D3X/D4S/1DX (only the fuselage). Some people think it is bulky. The battery life needs to be improved (it's not too bad, but it's very unpleasant compared with the D3X! There are 4400 of them, and only 700 of them are 645D). I'm looking forward to improving the capacity of the battery when Pentax launches its new machine, or providing a battery handle, which will be much better! As for the continuous shooting of 3 pictures per second, it is really very low!

summary

A good machine, may as well buy one to play!

Published on: 11:13, February 15, 2015 14 likes 1 comment

Workmanship: ten Imaging: ten Screen: ten Battery: eight Operation: eight cost performance: ten

Most satisfied

There is no way to compare the imaging effect 135,

Most dissatisfied

No continuous shooting

summary

The camera can no longer meet my requirements, so I will buy this machine. Other Hasu, Feisi is too expensive.

Published on: 12:37, August 22, 2014 11 likes 4 comments

In the past, I bought a Seagull 4B for three months. Now I can buy a PENTAX645Z with 10 months' retirement salary. As long as I like it, I bought it in Japan at the end of October. That's about 37650 yuan. It's a new machine (recently increased by 20%), coupled with the second-hand lens I bought before: 45.F2.8 120F4 80-160F4.5
MA * 300F4 645 2X...... A total of 50000 yuan is not worth it. Enjoy it in your lifetime

Published on: 09:37, November 9, 2015 14 likes 2 comments

I have used the Pentax 645 film camera, whose lens is comparable to Zeiss. I chose to start with 645Z, and the middle frame is the direction of future landscape photography. It seems that the full frame camera has reached the limit. It is reported that Nikon Canon is developing pictures, but it is certain that they cannot catch up with Pentax.

Published on: 12:56, August 10, 2014 34 Like 5 comments

The workmanship and quality of Pentax are very good. The performance and cost performance of this 645Z are very good. Unfortunately, now Pentax only produces APS and medium frame SLRs, but has not produced full frame SLRs for a long time. Now the full picture is very attractive. If Pentax produces a full picture SLR, it should be able to compete with Nikon and Canon.

Published on: 12:25, October 12, 2014 5 likes 1 comment

The price difference of the same product is too large, and it is difficult to distinguish the true from the false. Jingdong is out of stock.

Published on: 11:04, March 24, 2016 1 likes comment

4.7 The fuselage has a unique shape, good hand feel and good human-computer interface; The lens is insufficient and the focal section is overlapped, but the quality is good; Enough tolerance. It's a good machine.

Published on: 05:19, February 27, 2016 1 likes comment

Product packaging: intact.
Appearance: It's also very good. It feels very good.
Reaction speed: very fast.
Imaging effect: I have to say that video can
Portable performance: OK.
Other features: good videos and photos

Published on: 12:35, September 14, 2020 30 likes comment

I found that the 5S I bought before doesn't have anti shake. Decisively returned and replaced 5.. It's cheap, hehe.. Very powerful video camera, which can be used to take pictures..

Published on: 09:14, May 12, 2018 24 likes comment

After struggling for a month and a half, I finally decided to buy the machine. I studied the lower GH series in the midway. Although the video of the GH5s is stronger, and the photography of the GH9 is stronger, the GH5 is better than both, especially the anti shake of the fuselage. It's also interesting. When I used Olibas, I often said that M43 was not good. I didn't expect that when I wanted to shoot vlog, I decided Panasonic. The texture is great. The function keys are easy to use and can be customized. It is more comfortable and efficient than my A7R3.

Published at: 06:04, June 14, 2018 11 likes comment

I fell in love with this machine when I took pictures at school, and it is very suitable for taking personal images

Published on: 02:44, October 23, 2020 8 likes comment

I can't believe that the body of the machine can be so light, so I decided to drop a camera. After watching a lot of reviews, I finally chose this 10bit camera with 12-40 lenses. I can't believe the image quality. The sharpness is very good, the quality is good, and I did not wait for the Double 11 holiday. The menu of this model is not very suitable at the beginning, but after you adapt it, you will find that it is very simple. I believe everyone knows about 4K photography, and I feel good about focusing, It doesn't feel bad. Full HD 180 frames and 4k60 frames are easy to use. Second composition saves lives; The full touch screen gives me a great feeling; The anti shake of the fuselage is simply hanging any machine at the same price, and it can take a very stable picture without a stabilizer. Conclusion: The GH5 is really a very good machine, and it is recommended to buy it·

Published at 11:19, August 12, 2020 5 likes comment

The body is solid, easy to handle, and not tired. The 10bit 422 video is very powerful, and the 1235 lens stabilizer is not heavy. When you take it out to work, the battery life is very satisfactory!

Published on: 09:04, May 22, 2020 4 likes comment

Product packaging: the package is dark black and looks very grand
Appearance: The appearance of the GH5 fuselage gives a very solid and firm feeling, unlike the a73 fuselage, which is too small and has a bad grip
Imaging effect
Response speed: To my surprise, GH5 starts up very fast
Other features: the quality control of Gh5 is very good, and the leather is durable.
But I still hope that the manufacturer can slightly improve the auto focus and high sensitivity of GH5 through firmware update
Portable performance: because GH5 is an M43 frame system, the lens matched with it is very compact and easy to carry

Published on: 09:08, March 17, 2020 3 likes comment

It was obviously returned and resold by someone else, and the opening of the package had obvious marks of opening.

Published at: 05:00, October 9, 2018 2 likes comment

Very satisfied with the product, but the customers who sell Panasonic are not very satisfied. They don't know what to ask and what not to answer.

Published on: 11:49, April 30, 2018 2 likes comment

Small, qualified quality, plus free gifts, it is more cost-effective than offline, not useful, waiting for customer feedback

Published at: 04:28, November 29, 2017 2 likes comment
See more Loading

Pentax 645Z (55mm)

Reference quotation: ¥44999
104 word-of-mouth scores Rating: 9.8 points
 WeChat group