Comments on Nikon D750 (single machine)

It has been more than a month since we started, and we have taken more than 500 films. Let's talk about how we feel about using them, not to mention the upgraded parameters and data in the configuration table. Like many good reviews, the most recognized is the D750's focusing speed, fast and accurate. Whether it is cloudy or in low light conditions, it basically means where to play. Although the coverage area of 51 focus points is not as large as that of the D800, it is absolutely enough for amateur enthusiasts. Comfortable to hold, suitable in size and weight. Hold it for a long time without feeling tired. All kinds of buttons are very easy for old Nikon players to use, and they don't need to read the manual at all (except for the WIFI function, which has not been used yet). Pixels are enough, and the film can stand cutting. I like its high sense. When I shoot the stage in the auditorium, the picture is still clear and sharp, and the picture quality is first-class. I can't feel the difference between the film and my friend's D800 when I watch it on the computer, and it may be different when it is magnified to a certain size. The battery is powerful. Since I bought it back and charged it, I have taken more than 500 pictures, played with it, set various parameters, and now there are still two batteries. It is estimated that taking 1000 pictures is not a problem. Flip screen is easy to use, and overhead shooting is no longer a problem. I really like it!

Not all metal fuselage, I have little talent, I don't know how good the carbon fiber advertised by the merchants is? After all, I think it is not as solid as magnesium alloy. The maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 second has no effect, and it must not be used frequently. Many netizens said that the flip screen was afraid of being damaged, and the exposed flat cable did exist, but anyone would be careful to use the 10000 yuan machine, and there were few opportunities to open the flip screen. The shoulder screen is too small to be castrated and can only display basic information. The amount of information is poor. You can move the metering mode button forward or below the right side of the flash to increase the area of the shoulder screen. Will that increase the cost?
The hateful thing is that the strap of this camera is too thin. The typical low cost is not as good as my old D90 strap.
The most incomprehensible thing is that the randomly configured data cable is only 60 cm long. The manufacturer is really stingy!

Nikon D200 is too old. It has been used for more than 4 years. We always pay attention to Nikon. We need a civilian camera with comprehensive quality to meet the needs of N users who are short of money and have high fever. After watching the dross of the D600 and the remedy of the D610, we look forward to upgrading the D750, which basically meets the needs of this wave of players. The pixels that are not too high but are absolutely enough, so there is no pressure in the later stage. If you don't eat your head, the non gold rings in your hands can continue to play their vitality. The high sense and high image quality meet the requirements of fans at our level. Its price and cost performance make me unable to find a reason not to choose it.
Don't buy expensive ones, just choose the right ones, the most important ones for yourself, happy photography, simple life.

The balance is very good, and there is basically no weakness:
1. The flip screen is actually very practical, and there is no pressure for high and low viewing angles and video shooting. Most full frame machines do not have this feature;
2. The performance indicators are basically in the right category. For example, the maximum shutter of 1/4000 is a little uncomfortable to watch. Actually, people who know photography should understand that it is very unlikely to shoot portraits in full with lenses such as f/1.2 and 1.4 at noon on sunny days.
3. I appreciate the scene mode of D750, which is much more than Canon. The professional D810 does not have these. It is fast to set and friendly to the theme of quick response shooting scenes. I believe most people are also unwilling to frequently estimate the shutter, aperture and other parameters for manual adjustment.

1. Although all the problems have been solved, it is estimated that in several stages of history, the two famous recall failures of the cross cut gate and the shutter were caused by the cost!
2. The focus area is not as open as the latest D5/D500. Finally, a lot of drawings need to be cut. If the D760 is upgraded to the focus module of D5, it will really itch again!

After using 30000 shutters, I made a second comment, and the understanding should be relatively comprehensive; The two previous faults of the crosscut and shutter have been solved. In terms of performance and price, it is the first choice for a balanced full picture. Every penny is worth it.

The diagonal speed is fast, and 24.3 million pixels are absolutely enough. There are four professional light metering modes, and the video capture function is powerful. The flip screen is more useful. The details of high ISO image processing are perfectly preserved, which is also unique to Nikon for its sharp film production under high sense.

The decline of professional appearance level is also the reason why the price is reasonable. Absolutely high cost performance!

No matter which performance of Nikon D750 exceeds the current full frame SLR camera, its indicators exceed the quasi professional level except the appearance is inferior to D700. D800. From the perspective of high sense details, it is far better than Canon 5D3. Canon 6D. It is not on the same level as the 750. The focus speed is - 3VE, and the weak light shooting has exceeded Nikon's top D4S, not to mention 6D

Comprehensive performance, no obvious shortcomings. WiFi is practical and the handle feels good. At first, I thought the handle was strange. The weight of the body is moderate and not so tiring. The appearance is durable and the flip screen is convenient.

The only dissatisfaction is that all the photos taken are magnified to 100%, and the focus is slightly blurred. Compared with the photos taken with 6D, the difference is obvious. At first, I thought it was because of the lens or hand holding, but it was the same when I changed the lens. Later, I thought I wouldn't put the photo so big, so I went with him

I bought the first SLR 60D in 2011, and later replaced it with a 6D, but it took less than half a year to use the 6D, and I didn't want to use it when the shutter was less than 3000. The focus and photometry were changed, and the photos would be different. Later, at the end of October 2015, Nikon Model Store entered the D750 But it's almost useless when I bought it. I occasionally take photos and keep the moisture-proof box. I feel that Nikon's WiFi function is not as pleasing as Canon's 6D. At the beginning, it was inconvenient to set up the link. In addition, it seems that the WiFi cannot be named, which makes me feel uncomfortable. I'm just a photography enthusiast, not a senior person. I'd like to draw a picture. If there are friends who want to buy a full picture, I suggest you consider D750

The image quality is excellent, the image is exquisite, and the color is bright and natural. The pixels are not high or low, which just gives consideration to the balance between high pixels and high sense. I recently used 12800 in a dark environment when shooting at the National Expo. Surprisingly, noise is rarely seen. Flipping screen is better than nothing. The machine is not light or heavy, and the workmanship is also good!

Pay attention to the serial number of the recall machine in September of 2014 and 2015. The 1/4000 shutter is sufficient for daily shooting. After all, the D750 is not a sports machine used to shoot racing cars.

D750 is an advanced full frame camera with excellent picture quality, clear and delicate, natural color and complete functions. However, Nikon's poor publicity and marketing lead to poor sales.

The appearance is durable, the hand feeling is good, and the handle is light. Especially the optimized handle is deeper and thinner, and it can be hung on the finger. It has a sense of security than 810610, and it will not misoperate like d3. The pv button has enough pixels, and the quality of the picture is amazing. It is particularly tolerant. Dawn is the most obvious when it hits the water, but the light measurement and color restoration are still poor in the case of complex background light. High feeling can be used below 3200, and wifi is convenient for travel sharing and self taking.

Nikon intends to reduce the pressure and there is no afon. Even the thin shoulder screen has more room. The flash light often fails to play, the structural deformation strength is not enough, the screen resolution is average, and the photos on the mobile phone are much more wonderful immediately. The hundreds of mobile phone high-definition screens are not the same. It seems that the D5 has just been upgraded, which is really a lack of competition in the industry. Wifi is inhumane. Every time you send a picture, you have to preview all the pictures in the card into your phone. The front panel is not really a superimposed carbon fiber. Although the body material is not necessarily too tangled, it is unknown whether the front panel can withstand a lens suspension of more than 2kg. Then there are the 24120 really dark corners.

Overall, it has high performance and high cost performance. At the same price, 6d is far worse than that. To put it simply, if Nikon doesn't intentionally open the gap with 810 in some operation keys that reflect professional force, Nikon is afraid that the sales of 810 will be affected. Wise choice, balanced beauty, recommended purchase

The size and weight are moderate, with its own WIFI and flip screen, which are highly practical, fast focusing, strong sense, wide tolerance in the later stage, and high overall quality.

Since its launch, there have been many problems such as cross section light, shutter failure, etc. Although there have been many improvements and recalls, new problems continue to appear. It seems that the quality control of the product needs to be further strengthened. In addition, there are no obvious shortcomings.

It is a midrange model that is very suitable for photography enthusiasts. Its overall performance is very balanced, and there is no obvious weakness. It can meet the needs of photography enthusiasts regardless of focusing, continuous shooting, high sensitivity, and late stage. It is recommended for enthusiasts who want to further learn photography.

High sense, high tolerance, light body, skin wrapping in place, good hand feel, battery life, GPS and WiFi can completely replace mobile phones

Shoulder strap is too bad

It's such a good machine. To be honest, I really don't want to recommend it to you... I originally had a 5d3 at home, but it was stolen. After investigating for a long time, I felt that there was no cost to change the door, The d750 is more suitable for my needs, and then I started. If I use it on my mobile phone to send a circle of friends, the high sense 10000 is available, and the general printing 3200 is also no problem, and the tolerance is amazing. There are 4 or 5 ev under exposure. The details of the pull shadow are all there, and the image quality is not lost. The body is also relatively small and light, and the feel is good. The Bank of China has painted an area code to unlock the GPS, Now you can use the camera alone to record the journey

Light body, fast focusing, convenient interface operation.

The sensitivity is seriously insufficient, far from what is explained in the manual. I'm disappointed. Maybe it's a special case. Ask for advice.

After more than a year of use, I feel that the sensitivity of the 750 camera is seriously insufficient. A film with a sensitivity of 1600 is unbearable, much worse than the same sensitivity of 700.. At first, I thought that the settings were incorrect, but I repeatedly checked the settings and found that nothing was wrong. I wonder if you have encountered the same situation. The sensitivity of the two films is 1000 and 1600 respectively. Please have a look.

Fast focusing speed, especially in dim light conditions, high tolerance, rich dark details, noise can hardly be seen when iso is turned to 3200 in dim scenes, flip screen is convenient for view, wifi is convenient for photo transmission, small and portable body, and reasonable key layout!

Slag dropping, the maximum shutter speed is only 4000, the reflector is prone to err, the sharpness is not too high, there is no four leaf clover dial, not a magnesium alloy body!

Suggestions for home travel wedding and learning: buy d750, wedding photos, product landscapes and posters d810

High sense, image quality, fast focusing and focusing, real display, sharp color, and individual basically straight out of the original film. It feels that each film basically does not need late stage, which is conducive to family enthusiasts' operation. It is very economical for photographers who are not too demanding.

I have used 750 for two months, but my personal opinion is insufficient:
1. The shoulder screen is small, and some functions need to be viewed, which wastes a lot of power. I can only take about 500 photos when I am fully charged.
2. WIFI is immature and unused.
3. The rotating screen can only be viewed from top to bottom. It doesn't work very well and is basically useless. You should be careful when using the machine at ordinary times, for fear of damage.
4. The shutter sound is not small, with vibration, and it will paste the film if you are not careful.
5. The price reduction is too fast, which makes consumers lose confidence in this product. Is the improved machine coming out soon?

The overall feeling is that the balance is strong, the picture quality and high sense are first-class, light and small, and it is a good opportunity to travel and capture. Especially in the dark places of the party, the shooting is not noisy. What do you dislike personally? Maybe others like it?
The price dropped quite quickly. It should be a normal and reasonable price to drop to about 7K.

Very balanced! Have to admit! The imaging style and D810 are in the same camp, and the focusing speed and accuracy are both good. My hand is not big. I have a good sense of grip. It is very suitable for hand use. The functions such as WIFI are very practical. The metering is as good as the D810. Successive shooting is faster than D810. I took a wedding and was not disappointed.

The information displayed on the shoulder screen is limited, and some of it has been transferred to the LCD. The 1/4000 shutter is really a pity.

I dropped my D610 and decided to use the D750, which is obviously not the same thing as the former. The D610 can also be used with the zoom lens, but the automatic focusing accuracy of the 39 point focusing system is really not competent for many fixed focus heads, and the out of focus problem does exist. Fortunately, the D750 is much better. My decision is not a failure. However, at present, the price performance of the D750 is not high. It was the most appropriate time to start last year.

Balanced, cost-effective. At present, the fuselage is ￥ 8600. I am satisfied with focusing, WiFi and image quality (why there is no GPS?). The workmanship and materials are a little poor, and it seems OK. The flip screen is easy to use;

The shoulder screen control is convenient for old players to experience deeply, and once they get used to it, they can't put it down. But the D750 shoulder screen is really painful, but the shoulder screen castration is not as good as the D90/D7000, which is really unacceptable. They always want to wait for the D760,
1/4000 shutter and workmanship I can think that this is your product differentiation strategy (I'm afraid no one buys the D810), but the shoulder screen -- the shoulder screen -- the shoulder screen -- three times;

I can spend more money, and I can also afford 810, mainly because the two indicators of pixel and high sensitivity are 750,,
I hope that the next generation of machines can upgrade the shoulder screen+shutter - high sense, or I hope that Sony will kill these two. There has been no great progress, nor will it make any difference to the user experience. The performance has not been greatly improved, the quality and workmanship have continued to decline, and the price has remained stable for a long time;

The hand feel and appearance are good, lightweight, especially the optimized handle is deeper and thinner, and can be hung on the finger. It has a sense of security than 810610, and won't misoperate fn and pv buttons like d3. The image quality is amazing, especially tolerant. Dawn is most obvious when shooting sunrise on the water. High feeling can be used below 3200, and wifi is convenient for travel sharing and self taking. The shutter is sufficient.

Without afon, there is still more room for the thin shoulder screen. The flash light often fails to play, the structure has insufficient deformation strength, and the screen resolution is average. Photos on mobile phones are much more wonderful immediately, and hundreds of mobile phone high-definition screens are inferior. The D5 seems to have been upgraded, which is really a lack of competition industry. Wifi is inhumane. Every time you send a photo, you need to preview all the photos in the card and put them into your phone. Although I don't think the material of the body needs to be too tangled, I don't know whether the front panel can withstand the lens hanging of more than 2kg. And the 24120 real dark corner is very serious.

Overall, it has high performance and high cost performance. The price of 6d is far lower than that of 6d. To put it simply, if Nikon doesn't intentionally open the gap with 810 in some operation keys that reflect professional force, Nikon is afraid that the sales of 810 will be affected. Wise choice, recommend to buy.

1. Flip screen solves a major disadvantage of SLR camera
2. The operation keys are more convenient and simple than Canon full frame series
3. The machine itself records no current sound
4. The machine is equipped with special effect shooting function
5. The machine can be connected to the mobile phone via WIFI to take pictures remotely

Should the record key be designed next to the screen?

The best price is within 10000 yuan~!

1. It is light in size and weight. 2. Accurate focusing, good focusing performance in low light, and good performance in high sensitivity are the biggest motivations for buying the D750. 3. Color restoration is accurate. 4. The battery is durable. 5. The continuous shooting speed is good.

As everyone said, the shoulder screen is shrunk and the information is insufficient. Because it has only been 2 days, I haven't realized other shortcomings.

After waiting for a while, Nikon finally solved the glare gate incident, so he bought the machine that left the factory in 2015. The licensed goods purchased by Taobao for 10100 yuan were sent home by Shunfeng on the morning of March 22. After simple debugging, they went to the street to take photos. High speed continuous shooting has tested the focusing and continuous shooting performance. I am very satisfied with the performance of the D750.
Before writing comments, street photos and test feelings have been posted on D750. Interested friends can have a look.

The performance of 6D is comprehensively rolled, forcing Canon to offer 6D2 or 5D3 to reduce the price.

I would rather not rotate the screen or WIFI in exchange for 1/8000 and a real shoulder screen.

How can I open the aperture 1.4 on sunny days.

Nikon finally has built-in WIFI, and the screen can move

When the screen is pulled out half way, I see the electric circuit. The most serious problem is that the screen is a little loose. Will it fall out directly after using too much? Also, the shoulder screen shrinks badly. It looks uncomfortable and too small. Also, the position of the handle is not easy to handle. People without nails feel comfortable. However, if I have nails in my hand, it is not as good as the D610 when I grasp it around 2cm. Also, after the flash light bounces out, it will loosen slightly and make a squeaking sound

Verify whether the flip screen you bought is loose, and whether the flash lamp is loose or firm when it pops out. Ask for a reply so that I can have a reason to return the goods. Otherwise, the merchants say that it is common or the price will not be the same.

The effect of striking birds and flowers is remarkable.

The scenery effect is very ordinary, even worse than D7100. Some people like to brag. Scoring is the absolute truth. They say that friends who are close to 5D3 don't want to think about it. For 5D3, 4.4 points are given, and for D750, 4.0 points are given; The sales volume of 5D3 is several times that of D750. Everyone's eyes are bright.

After watching the scenery film taken by D750 camera, I felt really bad! Although some configurations are very attractive, compared with the scenery picture quality of the D800 and D810, the color is dry and the scenery is not smooth enough. The D750 is too weak!

Clarity, appearance and weight are all OK

Slag falling, adhesive strip breaking, water ripple

Not recommended