Comments on Nikon D810 (single machine)

High pixel, high sense is not too bad, especially the low sense plus electronic shutter front curtain, which is very useful for improving the image quality of some special requirements. The battery is not as bad as the legend. It has high cost performance.

At present, no obvious shortcomings have been found.

I have always liked to use Nikon. The D800 came into the market two years ago, and I feel that Nikon is strong again. Have the impulse to start, calm down, afraid of immaturity, entered the D600. As a result, Nikon replaced the new D610. The D810 was launched this summer, which I think is what I want. After the National Day, when the price stabilized, we did not hesitate to start.

1. Excellent sharpness and color, accurate and fast focusing, low sense and invincible.
2. The tolerance is very high. When the exposure is not accurate, use CAMERA RAW to pull the exposure+- two gears without too much pressure.
3. The battery life is quite good. It's OK to charge 400 batteries.
Although the pixel height is a double-edged sword, I think it can make people sit down patiently and deal with it slowly. This attitude is also worthy of the quality of this machine, rather than always wanting to make a hasty move to send friends. I like what my predecessor said. Sometimes people want to be a vassal even if they want to be a vassal. Maybe in this process, they will gradually get rid of laziness and resistance and move towards the road of advancement.

1. The 3200 noise is not acceptable
2. Heavy. It's nearly 4 kg with 24-70, but actually I don't think it's a disadvantage. I've practiced my skills. Why not? And that's the weight of high-end machines, hahaha
3. (Is this a disadvantage.

Suitable for friends who have some experience and want to go further
It's OK to work professionally
You won't regret it anyway
Send some photos of my daughter and students for everyone to see. The night scene was taken when I just bought it, which can be used as a reference (the original picture is too big to be sent, so I have to compress it, so I can make do with it)

1. Air cutting machine. Rich details and good layering.
2. Good imaging and fast focusing. 7 snapshots per second. Sharpness focus is also very good.
3. Good hand feel. Skin the fuselage. Large hands and small hands can be easily held.
4. Beautiful appearance and good details.

1. The lens is too heavy. Always use a tripod for long shots.
2. Some will have scratches on the base.

The camera released by Nikon D800 in 2012 had the highest resolution of the SLR camera at that time. The full frame CMOS with 36.3 million pixels made us feel the shock of high pixels. Two years later, the new D810 came with a new 36.38 million pixel CMOS, further improving the pixels and further reducing the original sensitivity. This D810 is undoubtedly the model that will push the 135 digital SLR picture quality to a new height.

The quality of the whole picture is the king, focusing quickly and accurately, the shutter machine shakes little, and the half machine is thrown away with high feeling

Skin peeling (many Nikon players have reported it), only SRAW does not have MRAW (60D has MRAW), which consumes more power than half frame

The first anniversary of using the D810 is an in-depth experience of using the machine. A large number of players have commented on the power of the D810. I will only talk about the experience of upgrading from half (Canon 60D) to full D810. 1、 Image quality: The space adjustment range in the later stage is large, the image quality of weak light and dark part is obvious, and the D810 image is pure, and the 60D low iso later brightening dark part will also have many noise points. 2、 Focusing: 51 focus points are much more accurate and efficient than only 9 focus points of 60D, and the focus area at the edge of the large focus coverage area can be used casually. Especially for portraits, the focus mode of 60D with center focus and focusing before composition can be abandoned. 3、 High sense: the indoor iso1600 with good outdoor light can be used casually. The 60D iso can not be used indoors when it is opened to 1000. The dark part of the picture is very dirty. 4、 Ultra wide angle lens and focal section do not need X1.5 conversion, for example, 351.4 is used to turn half frame into header. PS: I'm not black Canon. I just talk from the perspective of half picture upgrading to full picture. After all, most people start with half picture, and then think about upgrading to full picture. If I had bought the Nikon D7000/D7100 at the same level as 60D, I believe I would have reached a similar conclusion, and I also write clearly the shortcomings of D810, which is not as good as 60D. As for the advantages and disadvantages of D810 compared with Canon Sony cameras of the same level: the strongest dynamic range of iso64, rich lens groups, slow real-time focusing, no wifi and other players' comments have been detailed.

High pixel, excellent low sense, small internal shock of shutter optimization machine, increased electronic front curtain, improved image processing capability, built-in small flash, intimate small accessories, comfortable to hold

The shelving machine and system menu are complex, and the battery performance is too disgusting

Praise the advantages such as low feeling and improvement~~~
To put it simply, what's not so good about this week's use: first of all, it should be a problem that everyone can think of... It's really stressful to want to make a good movie! Especially in the case of large size+ISO64, after all, handheld occasions exist objectively, and amateur talent gathering can not be completely dominated by the tripod. So, although I have considered it before I started, it really hurts when I choose films;
In addition, although RAW supports 7360 * 4912 and 3680 * 2456 sizes, I still want medium size;
The last and most unbearable thing is that the battery is fully charged, double cards, no hanging anything, auto focus, no flash, and the lighting is good. Under normal use, 30% of the power of 72 pcs is lost! The D800 was already very unpleasant, and now it's even more excessive... you can't go out without a couple of batteries! Is this money in disguise??
Although I vomit so many grooves, I have to be sure that the D810 is really a good machine! This is not true~In addition, I have nearly 2000 shutter speed, and no residual oil problem has been found. Please rest assured! Above~

1. It feels good. But it is not as big as expected, and the little finger is still not strong enough. After using it for a long time, the middle finger is sour, and the handle is perfect.
2. It is not a shelf machine. At the beginning, it was difficult to drive. I went back to practice basic skills for a few days. I held the texture of gauze while standing normally, and it could be up to 1/8 seconds without being burnt (35mm). As a person with shaking hands, I want to say that posture is really important. I believe that most people will be better than me as long as the basic training is good.
3. The function is very good. The RAW format can be processed in the machine. Although it is not as good as the shadow catcher, it is basically enough. When the straight JPG is not ideal, simple processing can achieve the desired effect, which is very convenient. The picture is directly produced by JPG after the RAW format is adjusted in the machine. The picture is too large, so the system screenshot is taken.

There is also a disadvantage that is not a disadvantage. The high feeling is not as good as I expected. Therefore, when using automatic ISO, the maximum setting is 1600. The 3200 and 6400 are available, but not ideal.
Battery, because D90 was used before. So I think it's a little fast to power down, but it's enough with the handle and battery.

There are a lot of comments on the essence, and the advantages and disadvantages are obvious, so we won't repeat them.
As far as the function of post image adjustment is concerned, it is very good. In most cases, you can directly skip the shadow catcher and enter the PS phase.

Very good imaging clarity! Zoom quickly and focus clearly. The endurance is still under test. In general, this is a very balanced camera in all aspects, which is worth having.

The price is really not affordable for ordinary people. In addition to various scenes, I am going bankrupt!

The whole picture is a kind of missing. Missing is a kind of disease that has finally been detoxified. 36 million yuan brings a special experience that makes you fascinated and want to snap every day. In particular, your soft shutter sound sounds really comfortable. In general, this is a camera that is very balanced in all aspects and is worth having. D810 is my true love. Goodbye to my seven demons.

1. Super high resolution brought by high pixels, perfect detail performance; 2. The ultra high tolerance of CMOS not only creates a low sense and exquisite picture quality performance, but also expands the limit shooting range and fault tolerance; 3. The focus system and photometry system transplanted with D4S is undoubtedly the top configuration of Nikon at present, and its precision and speed are impeccable; 4. There is no doubt that CMOS without low-pass filter design can improve the image quality and luminous flux; 5. Including electronic front curtain shutter, low vibration reflector movement mechanism, plane color mode, light priority metering mode and other details, providing more support for professional photography; 6. (Features) Up to 9 pictures, covering ± 4EV exposure and shooting, the only full frame SLR camera with this value at present; 7. The compatibility of batteries and accessories is excellent, and the handle and battery can be common with D800/D800E; 8. The battery life is excellent. If 64GSD is equipped with 64GCF, in principle, the storage capacity of more than 2000 photos (RAW format) is just enough. The camera and two batteries with a handle can support full shooting.

1. High pixel cameras have higher requirements for holding and shooting preciseness. Shooting casually or with a slightly lower safety shutter will affect the details of the picture in light and paste the film in heavy. This is probably the main reason why many ordinary players cannot use the D8xx series well in the end. It is not that the camera is bad, but that they use the camera too casually; 2. Many parameter improvements, including color tolerance, are not strictly required, and are generally difficult to detect and be recognized by ordinary consumers; 3. The group focusing mode is not universal. The wrong use of group focusing sometimes causes greater possibility of out of focus. The instructions and various introductions do not provide correct explanations. As a new technology, it is hard to say how many people can reasonably use it; 4. The electronic front curtain can only be used under some conditions, that is to say, the electronic front curtain cannot be used under most normal shooting conditions. Please read the instructions carefully, and do not blindly believe; 5. Please read the instructions carefully and use them carefully. Not all of them are suitable for your shooting needs. It is good to use them correctly. If you do not understand them, using them will only increase the probability of failure. 6. The photos are huge, especially in RAW format, which requires high memory cards. A 1000x memory card is not cheap; (This is the same for D8xx series cameras) 7. The usable range of the high sense camera is not as good as that of the low pixel camera. If you do often use ISO3200 or above to take photos, it is recommended not to choose it; As for the ISO 3200 and below, I think that the ISO range can be adjusted through shooting technology. The ISO 400 and 3200 are only three speed shutter, and the tripod and anti shake can be fixed~!

The biggest advantage of the SLR camera is that it is equipped with more professional components and functions on the body, providing more accurate control and output guarantee, and coping with more extreme shooting environments, such as complex light and shadow, color temperature changes, high light ratio conditions, extreme temperature and humidity conditions, to ensure that the equipment can accurately meet the photographer's shooting requirements under any circumstances. From this point of view, the D810 is indeed one of the best equipped full frame SLR cameras. After the D800/D800E attempt, Nikon, in combination with the brand flagship D4/D4S technology research and development, has truly provided a perfect brand high pixel SLR solution. D810 is not only an upgrade, but also an almost perfect interpretation. The price after listing is actually lower than D800/D800E, which is absolutely the best choice for Nikon at this level.

However, the configuration of the D810 is too professional for ordinary consumers to feel and master the true use of these functions, but they are often subject to the negative impact of high pixels. If the SLR is used as a camera for taking photos, please do not choose this level of SLR. It must not be what you want! If ordinary players do not know about equipment and photography, please choose Canon 5D series, which is less prone to errors, or D7536 million pixels, which is not suitable for random shooting~

The excellence of D810 can only be realized by those who can really control and play its characteristics. Beyond the tolerance of more than one street of 5D3, it is perfectly surrounded by ± 4EV exposure in the environment of high light ratio~perfect details under strict shooting conditions~everything is decided by the photographer! If you can control it, it is a magic weapon!

There was a problem when I bought it. I was worried all the time. I still don't know the advantages.

I spent a lot of money to upgrade from D90 to D810, which doesn't mean that this machine is bad, but there is a problem with this camera I bought. Red stripes appear in the photos, or there is a fault in the pictures. At first, I thought it was a problem with the card, but there was still a problem after formatting. I replaced four CF cards and two SD cards with the same problem, which is very disturbing and disappointing.

Machines are good machines, but I'm angry. Are there any kind-hearted people who know what's going on

Good image quality and sound.

Color bright lines appear at the backlight shooting edge

It has been used for one year, and everything else is OK. When taking a backlight photo, the bright line on the edge is colored. Don't understand? Please give me some advice

The operation is more professional, and the full picture vision is more impressive. With the help of Niutou, you can produce Niupian.

The fuselage is too large and heavy, and it is not convenient to take long distance photos. There is no hot boot cover. It's a bit tight.

After upgrading from D90, I originally wanted to buy D750. Later, with the strong support of LD, I ensured sufficient funds to buy D810. I feel: I don't regret it! We have a Shima 35/1.4 on hand, so we only bought the machine body. After use, we found that 810 is more professional in operation and more convenient in adjusting various parameters. It is much faster than D90, with high pixels. The maximum JPG is 19M, which takes up more space. Computers with low configuration have a bit of a card when looking at pictures. The battery is OK, basically one can take more than 600 photos, and the two batteries can meet the daily shooting requirements. In the later stage, we will definitely enter the camera again. Now we are more confused about whether to enter Nikon 2470 or Nikon 1424. We originally thought about the 2470 of Shima, but later we rejected it. Look at the sample film. The last one was taken with D90+Sima 35/1.4.

No low-pass, high pixel, strong battery, small shutter sound, small machine vibration, fine performance of low sensitivity photos, high sensitivity 6400 is still good, 51 point focusing, good dark resolution, strong texture of magnesium aluminum body

The camera is a little heavy, but it's all floating clouds. High configuration requires a good lens head to reflect the camera's resolution ability. The lens is really expensive

It is also a good product. It is slightly large and requires a high lens. Otherwise, the high pixel effect will be discounted. If the budget is sufficient, you can consider this product, but if it is sensitive to portability and price, you can also consider that the D750 is a more user-friendly product and a good choice. You will not regret choosing the 810 camera. Of course, the budget is still a factor, depending on the individual

The pixels of the product are well done

The performance price ratio is not ideal

One year after purchasing the machine, I felt that the price of this machine was asymmetric. First, there were many noise spots. The ISO400 film could clearly see noise spots on ordinary computers; Second, it is difficult to focus. It is difficult to use several lenses to test. Even using a shelf, it is difficult to keep the focus of each picture clear. The safety shutter speed cannot be used! According to Nikon customer service, the fuselage will also affect focusing.
The above two problems are enough to prove that the performance of other parts of this camera is far worse than that of the D800 except for high pixels.

Focus tracking is fast and accurate! Continuous shooting is powerful, and the picture quality is first-class.

nothing

It's a camera that I can't put down.

My favorite is that the D810's shutter action is very light and the machine vibration is small. Focus is still fast and accurate under low light conditions. The AF-ON button is very professional and practical. Rich imaging layers and excellent image quality.

I haven't found any shortcomings for the time being.

It's a very powerful machine. Although the price is a little expensive, I still think it's worth it. Every penny counts.

I don't know how to control. You know. The battery is not so absurd. Of course, it is another matter if the poor merchants replace the original battery. Several 50MM/1.4G films are attached.

It's true to use big three yuan to weigh a little. Can this be a disadvantage.

Worth having

1. The focusing ratio of D700 is not a little bit better. The success rate of S35A and 85 1.8G full aperture wedding photography is more than 90%, and the accuracy is very close to D3S. However, the dark focusing ability (turning off the AF auxiliary light) is a little better than D3S, and it is generally the same level as D3S; D4 has never been used without comment, but it is said that the accuracy and dark focus ability are better than D3S;
2. The imaging is completely second to D700. After noise reduction in the later stage of the high ISO photo, 100% of it looks similar to D700. After the thumbnail reaches 1200W pixels, it is close to second gear better than D700 below ISO3200, and 1/3 gear better than D800 and D3S. However, even if the thumbnail is above ISO4000+, it cannot catch up with D3S, but it is still enough to bully D700; The automatic white balance straight out is much more pleasing than the D700, and the tolerance will not be mentioned; However, different people have different opinions on this one. After all, the D700 was a machine six years ago;
3. The shutter shock is similar to that of the D80 I used a few years ago, which is less than D700. When I use the S35A (D810) to squat and hold my breath, I can insist on 1/10S non paste, and D80 and D700 are 1/15S non paste;
4. I didn't expect to eat memory cards like that. I used 501 12BIT RAW (FX) cards, and only half of the 32G memory cards were installed. Theoretically, about 1000 cards could be saved, but the LCD showed 514 cards;
5. The burst cache is much larger than expected. 12BIT RAW (FX) burst> 25 cards can't lose speed, and there are only about ten D700 cards;
6. The battery has a good endurance. After taking 670 photos (shutter speed between 1/10~1/500S) with full power, there is still 33% power left. Please note that this is the result of the second full power of the new battery. Theoretically, it is OK to take 1100+photos with full power according to my usage habits after a period of time;
7. It feels better than the D700, and the shutter sound is very low, which is absolutely sultry.

1. The workmanship is not as good as that of the D700. The handle is made of D700 aluminum alloy into plastic. The inner flashing plastic bracket feels softer than that of the D80. When you press it with your hand, it feels soft. In addition, the storage card compartment lid is a little loose as the D700;
2. When playing off camera flash with YN-622N, high-speed continuous shooting will slow down to 3FPS. Maybe I didn't adjust it properly.

At present, the price of 15K parallel goods is worth upgrading by N users, and C users have not used it in depth, so they will not comment.

Picture quality

According to media reports, Nikon D800E has stopped production. This model is intended to replace the D800E. In the current market situation, the price difference between the D800 and the E model is obvious. If the D800 continues to be produced, it is estimated that the market price of the D810 will be around 22000. If this model is priced at about 28000 as mentioned by the media, it is believed that many users will lose interest, Nikon has not made a public statement about the black spots, oil leaks and dross that many users of the D800 and D800E are concerned about. However, two years later, the D810 came out soon, which makes people think that this is a patch version. As far as the machine performance is concerned, except for the quality of the machine body, it is a perfect full frame from the point of view of parameters, including the D800 and E, which can meet most of the business photography and public photography lovers. What consumers are most concerned about is that this updated model can be updated, improved Make up for the impact of the "quality gate" problem on consumers, continue to pay attention, and start at the appropriate price.

The image quality is very good. Good workmanship, powerful video recording function. Auto focus can be achieved by moving the focus and matching the shutter key. There are two options for white balance in automatic mode, including the original Nikon yellow scheme and Canon red scheme. Strong flash control function of set-top flash. 3D auto focus is easy to use and practical. Firm and quick. It is very practical and accurate in focusing when shooting moving objects. The frame switching function is practical, which can not only improve the continuous shooting speed but also increase the focus angle. The electronic front curtain shutter is not very practical, but it is definitely a good start. The screen color is adjustable.

SRAW format is very boring. Only 9 million pixels. If there are 20 million pixels, it will be practical. Without WIFI function, you cannot use your phone as the shutter cable. The price is currently high. High requirements for lenses and memory cards.

White balance, low sense, very powerful video function
The high sensitivity is better than 800. The high sensitivity 2000+has little problem in the first month of trial. The 3200 has noise, but it is still available. The workmanship is good. At least the appearance and workmanship are good at present. I hope Nikon can use this machine to reproduce the glory of the D700. No more quality gates.

1. Imaging has no words, and the sharpness is high to no friends. 2. High color reproduction of screen pixels. 3. The low feeling is excellent. 4. The photo has high pixels, and the high sense is good. 5. Add 24.70.

The continuous shooting speed is not fast, and the price is small and expensive.

The overall performance is excellent and worth starting with.