In terms of appearance, the design is novel and creative, which is also conducive to sound wave transmission.The color matching and modeling of the box and dust screen are good.In terms of workmanship, the handle of the buttons and knobs is good. The wire connecting the sub box is thick and uses balanced pins, which is much better than the entry-level ones.The workmanship of the back plate, dust-proof net, and case covering is quite fine.In terms of sound quality, tri band balance, common 2.1 and low-end 2.0 are almost difficult to achieve this, because the loss of mid-range is the biggest problem. This speaker solves this problem better. The mid-range is much better, and it is very full both in instrumental music and in life.High frequency has no special highlights. It is standard. Low frequency is very good thanks to the box design. It does not lose the point 1 in 2.1, but it is a 4-inch speaker after all. Low frequency has inherent weaknesses.In addition, the remote control is very easy to use, but it is faster to adjust the volume manually.
Most dissatisfied
Personally, I think there is no defect in the appearance. In terms of workmanship, the screw holes for fixing the speakers are not very neat. The 3.5 turn RCA signal line is also thin and thin.The cushioning material on the package is not foam plastic, but egg carrier paper. I don't know which is better.In terms of sound quality, the disadvantage is still low frequency.The 4-inch unit is so large that the low-frequency frequency it can emit will not be too low, and the quantity is insufficient. This is a weakness.If you want a good low-frequency, you still need to be more than 5 inches. Of course, the size will also become larger, so you have to weigh it according to your own needs.In terms of tuning, both high and low tones are at the 12 o'clock position. Personally, I don't think the volume is enough. It's most appropriate to hit the 2 o'clock position.At the end, the high pitched voice makes noise and the low pitched voice mixes.Of course, this is the feeling of a new horn. We still need to boil it.
summary
It was bought by someone from East China. After placing the order, there is a 149 earphones for free, so the cost performance is still very high!In addition, this price usually looks at the D1010MK2 of Huiwei. I have never heard of this model. The R1600TIII has power advantages based on the parameters alone, but the quality of the speakers may still have a gap. I hope someone can make a comparison.
The model is avant-garde, with large power, exquisite sound, good texture, durable sound, and sufficient materials. The 60 watt bookshelf is suitable for listening to music in the large living room.
Most dissatisfied
The sound quality of the 99 yuan speaker of MBO M-111 popular version is not much worse than that of the 399 yuan speaker of Rambler R1600Tiii.There may be room for improvement without a cooker.The sense of bass is not enough. If the bass is more than 5 inches, it will be perfect.
summary
This speaker has a sense of texture, no sense of volume, and only treble without bass at a distance.The power of 60 watts is too large to listen to music in the bedroom.The cost performance ratio is not high. 399 can buy a 2.1 mid range speaker of a 6.5 inch subwoofer, so it is unnecessary to buy a 2.0 mid range speaker within 500 yuan.This speaker is estimated to sell 299, which is not bad.Therefore, there is no need to look at the evaluation. It is better to go to a comparison audition so as to make an ideal purchase.
Jingdong bought it in September from Shenzheng. It has been a concern for some time. This product has always ranked second in the village list, and the price is acceptable, so we started.Don't mention, the effect of putting it on the TV in the living room is just right. It is more than many times stronger than that on the TV.I haven't heard of it for thousands of yuan. I think this one is very good.
Most dissatisfied
Auricularia, I didn't hear anything.
summary
Generally, it's very good to use it, and it's worth getting started.The picture was taken during the sound playing. Sorry.
The voice is extremely green, bright, melodious and beautiful. I'm not tired of listening to it for a long time!The bass is done very well, just right!I don't like bass sound very much!Excellent workmanship!Great discounts and benefits for consumers!The manufacturer of rambler is very kind and self loving!
Most dissatisfied
No shortcomings!Some are satisfied!Bad friends are from other manufacturers, and laymen who don't understand!But it is better to increase the volume to 80W, add FM and SD card playing functions, and add a headphone hole!The audio cable should be the same as Akihabara's!
summary
Such products hope that walkers can add FM and SD cards and headphone holes on this basis!I'll buy two more!
The appearance is very impressive, the workmanship is quite good, the wooden structure is of high grade, and a small remote control is very convenient
Most dissatisfied
The sound quality is weak to the extreme, and the performance of high and low tones is not good. This is the highest priced rambler I have ever bought, and the sound quality is also the worst. The sound quality is much worse than that of a small speaker costing 30 or 40 yuan!
summary
The appearance and materials are all OK, but the sound quality...
I bought this speaker because I liked it. I bought it for my parents to plug it into his TV. The TV can't control the external volume. Ordinary speakers have to go to the speakers to adjust the volume, so I specially chose speakers with remote controls. The buttons on many speakers' remote controls are too complicated. My parents don't have so much proficiency in English. When I saw this speaker remote control,The sound quality of the walkers' 400 yuan speaker can't be poor, can it?Buy it immediately. The bass is turned up, and the shock is not worse than other 2.1 speakers. The sound quality is really good. In a word, I like it very much, and it is very easy to operate.
Most dissatisfied
What's in it?It's so heavy. I used to use more than 100 small garbage speakers. When I got this speaker, I felt it was very heavy
summary
Buy it and show respect to your parents, absolutely
The performance of string music and voice should be the highlight of this box.Medium and high frequency are good.The volume is also quite high.
Most dissatisfied
Low frequency is not good, the strength is too poor, very stuffy, and distorted. After using it for more than 2 months, I feel that the cooker has been turned on, the low-frequency ones have been slightly stronger, and the stuffiness is not so severe.However, the low-frequency distortion is still quite obvious, presumably because of the Class D power amplifier.
summary
Medium and high frequency are good, but low frequency is not good. Low frequency distortion is obvious.There may be moisture in this box of amplifier.
I feel that the mid treble is much clearer than the 1900TIII. It sounds very comfortableClass D amplifier, low calorific value
Most dissatisfied
Bass is not a strong point. The 4-inch loudspeaker unit is small
summary
I feel that the mid treble is much clearer than the 1900TIII. It sounds very comfortableClass D amplifier, low calorific value. Listen closely to the integrated sound card of this book, so I didn't buy a box of higher price
First of all, I am not a gunman. If I buy back half a year's sound quality, I can only use two words to describe it: amazing!!Of course, it refers to the price of 400 yuan. Of course, it also includes the credit of SRS. A sound master said that he felt that there were too many burrs, and he could not listen when compared with his 30000 yuan price. What is this called? 30000 yuan and 400 yuan. I want to use foul language!!I went to him and heard the sound of the honeybee nest. This is the professional audio??In addition, the back power amplifier board is not hot at all, strong!!!Mute without any current sound, this is the technology!!
Most dissatisfied
The woofer is too small, and there are not enough lower channels
summary
The king of 400 speakers, I can't think of another speaker that can be compared. Don't compare with those over 400. Be kind!!
The treble is harsh, the midrange is sloppy, the bass is blurry, lacks flexibility, and is in a muddle. Standing 2 meters beside the box, the bass is still buzzing, and it's very uncomfortable to hear.
The treble is very good, and the bass is better than expected. There is no sense of oppression. The overall feeling is relatively beautiful Very good workmanship, very good appearance There is basically no current sound I thought the remote control was useless. After using it for a while, I felt it was very convenient
Most dissatisfied
It's not a disadvantage to say that the ones with low frequency are still 5 inches So there are no major shortcomings
summary
Overall, I was very satisfied with the price. Personally, I thought it was more suitable. There was a lot of improvement compared with 200+
The box is avant-garde in shape, with walnut wood panels on both sides. The assembly process is excellent. The vocal part is full and clear, especially the treble part. It is very suitable for listening to music. The power amplifier circuit should be made of enough materials, which has not shrunk on it
Most dissatisfied
The bass is a bit muddy. I don't know if it's because I just bought it and didn't boil it
summary
I started with 399 and felt that it was worth it, both in terms of materials and sound quality,
High frequency can be adjusted, which is really great. Sometimes I listen to violin, guitar and girls, but I usually listen to pop music more.At the beginning, I had a 2.1 R201T12 speaker, which is enough for me with wooden ears.Unfortunately, there was an excuse for the satellite box to be broken, but the satellite box was not broken, which forced me to buy a subwoofer main box. It seemed that I might as well buy a 2.0 box. I wanted to buy the R1700, but the price was more than 100 yuan, so there was an additional Bluetooth function. Others were not much different from this model, so I recommend this model for its cost performance.I just came here and tried the ferry. I felt that it was similar to the old speaker. Then I listened to several songs with high frequency of audition. My mother opened the door of the new world, and then compared it with R201.The female voice is extremely clear. Maybe she has heard too much garbage all the year round. There are many differences in listening to better speakers.At first, I came to Zhongguancun and thought that this speaker might not work. I really bought a comparison before I knew that I could not trust all netizens!
Most dissatisfied
The subwoofer is too loud. It's not very clear. I don't think the sound can spread at all.It's like the feeling of listening after the ear is filled with water. Although it is adjustable, I still feel this feeling even when I adjust it very low.
summary
I think the 400 yuan is good. It is at least one grade higher than my original garbage 2.1, which is more than 200 yuan. There is still a cost performance ratio. If you need Bluetooth, you should buy 1700 yuanIf only there was a standby function.In addition, the remote control is a bit weak.As a computer speaker tuning is really close, my keyboard can also control.But as a bookshelf speaker, it may be good. If it can be sold separately, I don't need to pay for the remote control. I think as long as you are not a fan, this speaker can meet most of your needs.
The workmanship of the back plate, dust-proof net, and case covering is quite fine.In terms of sound quality, tri band balance, common 2.1 and low-end 2.0 are almost difficult to achieve this, because the loss of mid-range is the biggest problem. This speaker solves this problem well. The mid-range is much better, and it is very full both in instrumental music and in life.High frequency has no special highlights, and it is standard.The model is avant-garde, with large power, exquisite sound, good texture, durable sound, and sufficient materials. The 60 watt bookshelf is suitable for listening to music in the large living room.It is hoped that walkers can add FM and SD cards and headphone holes on this basis.
Most dissatisfied
No shortcomings
summary
I think it's worth it. Both the material and sound quality are worth it.
I believe in the digital gun text. I feel very disappointed when I bought it. I can't stand playing a few songs. The bass analysis is really bad. The treble is average
It's not worth listening to my 19 yuan speaker.The effect of watching the movie is good, but I can only listen to the music. One hand hovers on the knob to control the bass.
I didn't think it was very good when I first bought it. After I opened the cooker, I felt it was very good. Replacing a 3.5 turn lotus head audio cable made of oxygen free copper worth more than 10 yuan can improve the audio quality. The cable from the original factory is too poor. I'm just a speaker enthusiast. I think it's worth 400 yuan. It's worth more than the price.
