Comments on Canon 100D (EF-S 18-55mm STM)

The body of the SLR, the weight of the SLR, and the ability to use the full range of EF bayonet lenses are amazing. No need to add additional lenses and adapter rings. The optical viewfinder is much more convenient than the screen view of the SLR. It is completely a part of the SLR

Maybe it's because of its small size. The grip is average. It's beautiful in white but not resistant to dirt. It's inconvenient without an independent aperture dial. The touch screen is often touched by mistake. The focus system of the low-end computer+the 18 million CMOS inherited by the factory can hardly show sincerity

Maybe it was Weidan who couldn't hold up his head in front of Dafa, but also wanted to recover some weight sensitive users. In order to attract the attention of female users, it also made an exception to launch white. So the publicity focuses on the female machine, which is really a bit of a hole. I like whether this machine will be sprayed?

Well, seriously, if you want to be light and portable, but also want the performance of SLR, 100D is definitely your best choice. And if your main machine and lens group are Canon, then you should choose 100D, which saves the investment of lens, does not need the adapter ring, and you do not need to learn the operation again, but also can maintain the performance of SLR. Why not do it? Now most micro units do not have viewfinder. The disadvantage of screen shooting is that it will be more painful when you shoot outdoors. When the light is strong, it is difficult to use screen shooting, which interferes with your shooting. 100D allows you to devote yourself to shooting

Now the most fortunate thing is that I didn't buy EOS-M

The above is just my personal experience, for your reference

I started with 100D. Before starting, I experienced 600D, 650D, 700D in the experience store, as well as D3200, D5100, D5200. I'm not a photography enthusiast. I haven't used any SLR before starting with 100D. I can't say anything about the specific operation, and I'm not qualified to comment. As for the picture quality, I only compare it with Canon's. Because of the basic configuration, there is no difference between 600D and 650D (the 600D processor is the previous generation). When I compare the pictures I took with those in ZOL's evaluation, I feel that there is no difference. But 100D real-time view taking and focusing speed is very fast. I am a consumer DC, and I don't like to take pictures of Cyclops, Therefore, we attach great importance to the focusing speed of real-time SLR LCD viewing, 600D, 650D, 700D, as well as the 3200D, 5100D, 5200D of the dead end. In real-time viewing, free movement of multiple single points or free movement of multiple multiple points are all bellows, not as good as EOS M! 700D is better (of course, the fast mode focusing of these cameras is the same). Under 100D real-time shooting conditions, the speed of free moving multi-point focusing and free moving single point focusing is very fast, even faster than Sony's 3N. Under real-time shooting conditions, the capture speed is first-class. Again, I'm talking about the real-time shooting of the SLR LCD screen. Do not spray your own weight!

This is the first SLR. I use the automatic mode of the machine. I have never used the SLR before. I don't know anything about manual SLR, so I don't know what the disadvantages are~~

The picture quality is much better than that of my Kodak DC, which has been used for 5 years. As for the comparison with Weidan, I don't know. I never used Weidan! Real time shooting is quick and crisp!

Good handling, convenient and light touch screen. At this price level, only 100d will be returned for the selected order. Never select a WeChat order higher than this price level. Affordable, cost-effective, compact, light and convenient

The picture quality is poor, the focus is less, and the body workmanship needs to be refined. 100D can work hard on picture quality and workmanship. The high-end market for women is huge! The refined metal body and the image quality sensor are high-end products that are not inferior to European products. My man is also using 100D. The hand feel is average, the image is average, and the image is not excellent

Easy to use

Expectations are too high to be disappointed

Personally, I bought it in Japan. I think the price is very appropriate and very good. But don't expect too much for shooting at night. It's noisy! In general, it's worth it

If you want to buy a 100D, you can buy a white one. It has a really high appearance and is especially suitable for girls. The EF-S18-55mm STM head is suitable for beginner players. As long as you use it properly, you can also shoot many good movies. It is mainly used for food. It can be sent directly without repairing the film. It is very convenient to buy a WiFi SD and send it directly to the mobile phone.

The biscuit head is not very useful, not recommended.

Lightweight, suitable for girls at entry level

Half framing machine, noisy at night

After all, it is an entry-level product and can't be too demanding. For girls, lightness is the biggest advantage. The 18-55 of the set machine is basically useless, and the 18-200 of the home machine can be used directly. The big aperture effect of the biscuit head is OK, but the focusing is limited.

Small, light. Sometimes it's fun to take it out and add a small spittoon biscuit.

The storage speed is extremely slow, so slow that I want to vomit. I don't want to say anything about focusing, but the price and positioning are there. If you shoot the night scene for a long time, it will be stored for a few seconds. That is to say, if you shoot for a long time for 30 seconds, it will be stored for 30 seconds after shooting, which is equal to one minute. I have never seen such a slow fuselage before, which is hard for me to accept!

Please be careful: first of all, I have 600D, 7D, 5D3, 6D, so I fully know their performance differences. I don't recommend starting with 5XX-6XXD-7xxD or 5XX-6XXD-7xxD. This machine can only be used as a toy and can't be used as a meal. So it's better to buy a 700D honestly. If you are short of money, you can choose 600D. Its performance is much better and its price is about the same.

Light and fast focusing

Half frame camera, noisy shooting at night

After all, it is an entry-level product and can't be too demanding. For girls, lightness is the biggest advantage. The 18-55 of the set machine is basically useless, and the 18-200 of the home machine can be used directly. The big aperture effect of the biscuit head is OK, but the focusing is limited.

Lightweight, suitable for girls

The image is not sharp and transparent. It is also APS-C frame. The image quality of 50F1.8 small spittoon lens is much worse than that of the mud puddle D7100 using 50mmF1.8D from the mud puddle house. High sensitivity and focusing performance are also much worse than D7100.

This model is only suitable for girls. It is also an APS-C picture frame. Canon 100D uses a 50F1.8 small spittoon lens. Compared with the image quality of the mud puddle D7100 using a 50mmF1.8D from the mud puddle house, the image quality is too poor.

Small and exquisite Focus fast, good, good

I haven't found anything yet. Everything is very good

Good quality and cheap, Shifu

It is convenient to carry, and the socket imaging is good. It doesn't need any technology to take good photos, and the night scene is also very good without flash. The key is that the price is good.

I just started the SLR, and I have no experience

pretty good

Lightweight and portable; Many creative filters

Less interchangeable lenses; The screen cannot be flipped

Lightweight and portable; There are many creative filters. Less interchangeable lenses; The screen cannot be flipped

Convenient focus adjustment and high multiples

The display screen is not clear and the effect cannot be seen

High cost performance

The machine body is very small, with a small spittoon or biscuit head. It is also good for beginners.

The body is light, and there are some problems with the weight distribution of the heavier lens. The grip is also slightly poor.

Not bad for entry-level

Light and convenient, small and light, excellent picture quality, affordable price

Fast power consumption, average feel..