Comments on Nikon D7100 (single machine)

The most obvious advantage of this machine is 51 point focusing. The focusing system similar to the D800 is very conducive to accurate focusing and capturing the object. The camera has a good grip, and the body is exquisite. I started it last year. I feel the battery has a strong endurance. With the imaging ability of 24 million pixels and the removal of low-pass filter, the image quality is sharp and the details are clear. Good cost performance.

The high sense performance of the machine is a weakness, and the storage speed is slow when using RAW format for continuous shooting.

Nikon D7100 is undoubtedly an excellent camera. The technical parameters have explained its strength in terms of data and theory, but the most convincing thing is to use it to take good photos.

High cost performance, easy to use

The D7100 has been purchased for more than a year, but it has crashed several times during shooting, the memory card light is on, the shutter cannot be pressed or closed, and the battery must be pulled out to turn it off. I went to the Nikon repair shop a few months ago and found no problems. I gave it a initialization. Up to now, the problem has not been solved. (The above problems are illustrated in the figure)

Quite satisfied with the machine, but the problem of crash is annoying. I don't know what the reason is.

The D7000 used by the Hong Kong Branch, which started on July 28, suffered a major failure six months ago. Waiting to upgrade the whole picture, the pixels of the D800 are too high to control, so it's easy to wait for the D610, but the focus distribution is very painful. But I have no choice but to upgrade the whole set for a while, so I will buy a D7100 to use it first. When the ideal D620 comes out, or when it is said that the D810 will be started in, the D7100 will be used as a standby machine (long coke to shoot wild animals).
Advantages: 2400W pixels+no low-pass filter+51 focus points. With a better lens, the edge of the D7100 flashes immediately. The clarity and sharpness are much higher than those of the D7000 immediately identified by the naked eye, and the details are also much richer.

The plastic feeling of the fuselage is too strong, but the size is too small. The hand feel is not good, so we have to equip a handle. The most unaccustomed thing is the shutter, which is soft and has no feeling, and has no strength at all. Especially when shooting at high speed, that feeling is really bullshit.

2400W pixels+no low-pass filter+51 focus points=D7100 highlights. The Nikon 70-200 second generation bamboo cannons were also purchased with the D7100. After two days of testing, the sharpness and color of the two combinations are quite strong, and the details, sharpness and level are obviously more than those of the D7000,. It can be said that in addition to the size of the frame, the D7100 is no inferior to the D610 in other aspects.
Another thing to add is that many photographers are still struggling to choose Canon's 70D or Nikon's D7100. Coincidentally, on the 11th of last month, I also bought a Canon 70D with 17-55/2.8 and 28/1.8 heads, which is purely for video games. There are my open box photos and photos on the 70D forum. If you are a simple photographer, it is recommended to choose D7100. If you are taking photos and videos at home, you can consider 70D.
The photos taken by D7100 were then posted on Nikon 70-200 lens forum. Interested photographers can go and have a look. I have talked so much about it, and hope it will be helpful to everyone.

There are too many advantages. 1. There is no low-pass for 2400w. 2. The aluminum magnesium alloy body is sturdy and durable. 3. The 51 point advanced af system. 4. The LCD display is accurate and bright. 5. The 100% viewfinder is really wide, bright and comfortable The video quality is obviously higher than the previous generation aps-c of the brand. The picture is much better in low sense, and the dark details have also been improved in quality, which can be used to make micro films.

Disadvantages: at present, the place where I feel the shortest board is the high sense. I feel that color noise is becoming very obvious when I am above iso1600. The noise reduction inside the machine is basically no matter what it is used for, but it is OK to use software to reduce noise. The highest available is 3200. If it is higher, the loss of noise reduction details will be more serious. As for the problem of continuous shooting cache, there is no deep complaint at present. The main reason is that I use less for continuous shooting, so I feel that the problem is not serious at present.

I feel that there is no obvious weakness at the current price. First of all, what I like most is the solid and durable body design, aluminum magnesium alloy and dust-proof and drip proof, which makes me feel secure and satisfied when I hold it in my hand. My friends who are struggling with the d300s really don't have to worry about it. They say that the sense of operation is not as good as that of the d300s. It only takes a little time to quickly adapt to the operation of the d7100, and the efficiency is absolutely no less than that of the 300s. The key is that the performance and image quality are superior. Don't tell me about continuous shooting. The speed of 300s14bit raw continuous shooting shit has already explained the problem. Besides, Buying this machine does not depend on continuous shooting. Talking about lightweight, this is definitely one of its design ideas. Some people say that "too light, no feel" and so on. Nikon has spent a lot of effort to reduce the weight, but it can not satisfy many people's desire for stupidity... What I'm not very satisfied with at present is the high feeling. There is no major problem with iso1600 and below. If the color noise is higher than this, the color noise is more serious. The highest available iso is 3200. However, if you compare carefully, there is no obvious regression compared with the previous generation, and the pixel improvement is huge, so it is not too tangled... By the way, the other thing that is not very good is that the power consumption is quite high. If you play back frequently or operate on the LCD screen, the power drops very sharply. I think it is an optimization problem. The same battery has a stronger endurance when used on other models. The video is much better than the previous generation aps-c model. The most obvious thing is that the dark details under low iso have been greatly improved. 51 point focusing is very powerful at present, but I seldom use focusing and capturing, and I don't have a suitable swm telephoto lens. The advantages are not obvious, but the reliability is still reliable. In general, this model carries forward the good tradition of "committing crimes below" in the mud pit, and adds the symbolic performance of many professional models. It is a good choice for the majority of photography enthusiasts, and also makes us feel a certain sincerity. Although there are some regrets, I don't think these shortcomings are a problem with its current price.

I used to use a Canon 700D, an entry-level machine. It took me more than half a year to press the shutter button for five or six thousand times. Colleagues and friends use Nikon more often. In order to make a living, they took Canon out of the company. In the view of buying new products rather than old ones, they joined the single machine of the D7100! After one month's experience, 51 points focus, 2410W pixels, no low-pass filter effect, I won't say more

The operability is not as easy as Canon, the fixed screen is not as convenient as the rotating screen, and the shooting of some advantages and difficulties needs to be completed by yourself

It's a very good machine. As a non full frame machine, it should be the highest cutting machine so far. It's just that the price fluctuates a little. I hope the price performance can be comparable to the D7000

1. The biggest advantage is that the 51 point focusing system is basically invincible in half frame
2. The semi metal body must be more durable than the full plastic body
3. No low-pass technology makes the high pixel Nikon machine return to its unstoppable style
4. Adding new functions is really a good tool for fighting birds. The telephoto lens can be used as an astronomical telescope. Other cameras can't do this

1. The biggest problem is that the pixels are too high. Such a high pixel density requires a very good lens to be qualified for image quality, so that even the overshot is 16-85 (worth more than 4000), and the previous half of a picture can be taken with a good image quality only 18-105 (worth more than 1000), and adding pixels will make consumers pay twice as much for it (it is worth 12 million!) All I got was not much better picture quality, which was really not cost-effective.
2. The pictures taken are very large, and the computer processing is a little tired. If the pictures are put on the Internet or developed smaller, the quality of the miniature pictures will be lost later, and it is estimated that the quality of the pictures will be greatly reduced.
3. Generally, the color of the photos taken by the high pixel photosensitive film should be darker, and saturation needs to be added later, which will damage the image quality.

We all know that the newer the camera, the better. But we should remember that this view can only be established in the technical level. The D7100 must be better than the D7000 or D90 in technical performance. But when buying it, we should consider: Do I need to be so good? In other words, a good camera does not mean that we are good at using it. Especially for those who are just starting to learn photography, high pixel cameras actually have many limitations, such as the need for better lenses; Better anti shake effect is required (more tripods are used); The tablet yield will be low; The later stage will be heavy; In short, it takes a lot of energy and money, but the processed photos actually lose a lot of pixels and image quality. I can't feel how different from the old cameras, maybe even worse! It is suggested to choose according to your own needs. Don't follow the trend. You are not a wall climbing party to take spy photos, not an ornithologist who likes to shoot birds, not an astronomer who likes to see the craters on the moon, or a psychopath who likes to count the hairs on people. You'd better save some money.

51 point powerful focus, no low-pass let me see a bright, high pixel high quality, beautiful and compact body design, 1.3X cutting easy to have a large telephoto!! I was worried about Gao Gan, but after reading the evaluation and various high feeling test posts on the forum, I was basically satisfied with Gao Gan. 1600 is fully available, and 3200 is also OK!!! 6400 can barely be seen without magnification (provided that standard noise reduction is opened)

Semi metal body
Continuous shooting is slightly slow

This upgrade is very kind. I like Nikon very much. Now the price is around 7800. Wait a minute, it's worth getting started!!! (Although it is awesome, I don't think it can replace the D300S.)

The Great Leap Forward in other parameters will not be mentioned, but some details:
1. There is no powerful analytical power of low-pass, and the image quality exceeds D5200 (it can be recognized that, The image quality of the d7100 and D5200 sensors is the same, but the DXO evaluation is divided into three categories: color depth, dynamic contrast, and high ISO availability. However, the improved image resolution and sharpness after removing the low-pass has not been verified, which also shows that this is not the primary consideration of DXO testing, because resolution and sharpness are also related to the lens, and DXO is the tested sensor. This test results in the removal of almost the same score of D71 and D52 of the low-pass filter, which can be seen from the scores of K-5II and k-5iis. In a word, the picture quality of the D71 must surpass that of the D51, which is no doubt, not to mention the performance of the D71 fuselage and its evolved powerful operability!)
2. Improved operating system: the newly added "OK" key is customized, and the playback photos can be set to be zoomed in with one key; Fast switch between new manual ISO and automatic ISO (ISO shortcut key plus front wheel); The "Auto" gear is added to the lowest shutter in the auto ISO mode (the shutter speed can be set according to different focus segments. The "Auto" gear can also be used to further subdivide the shutter speed, and two gears can be added or subtracted. For the anti shake lens, the lowest gear can be directly selected, that is, the standard shutter speed can be reduced by two gears, for example, for the 50MM lens, the APS-C standard shutter speed is 1/80, and the two gears can be reduced to 1/20, which helps maintain the lowest ISO); Shortcut keys such as FN can be combined with wave wheel settings

1. The protective cover of the display is removed.
2. The viewfinder level and LCD level are still two-dimensional
3. The viewfinder level cannot be opened through the setting menu. It can only be set through the shortcut key, and it cannot be displayed with the viewfinder grid at the same time. Restart to cancel the viewfinder level display.
4. The "red dot" video recording function cannot be customized. I hope it can be customized like the FN key, or like the "green dot" of Pentax, it can be made into a quick recovery function (after adjusting the exposure, press the "red dot" to restore the normal exposure value, instead of dialing and dialing every time the normal exposure is restored).

Top DX machine, excellent operation, first-class image, but it can be further improved~!

The focusing speed is very fast and the image quality is good. 1.3 is very practical. The continuous shooting speed is fast. The handle is average.

I used to use Nikon D80 and D90. I mainly like taking pictures of flowers and birds. Recently, I bought my long-awaited D7100 and used it for more than ten days. The most disappointing thing is that when shooting flowers or birds, there is no focus when selecting AF-A, S, P gear, and you can't point where you are going. That is to say, in the focus, the photographer cannot move to the point where he wants to shoot. For example, when shooting birds in the forest, there will be branches, and the birds will stop on the inconspicuous branches. It is difficult to focus accurately at this time. Most of the focus falls on the conspicuous branches, but not on the birds' eyes. It can focus accurately when shooting a very conspicuous and simple target. Of course, you can click the shutter several more times until the focus falls on the bird's eyes and then press the shutter. However, the bird may have flown away by now. Of course, you can also use the motion mode in the scene mode to shoot birds, where you can point and shoot. However, there is also a problem. If we capture egrets, the subject will be overexposed. If you don't believe it, you can try it. Because I can't lower or lighten the ISO. It is automatic. There is also no need to use high ISO when shooting birds moving slowly or flying slowly, which will reduce the image quality. If we don't care about the picture quality, then of course it is not a problem. We can also adjust the lens or body to M gear when AF-A, S, P gear, and focus manually. However, in this case, we can only shoot dumb birds. Someone said in the forum that the image quality of the D7100 was very good when it was in ISO 1600, which is irresponsible

In general, Nikon D7100 is a good successor to D90 and D700. However, it is not the real successor of D300S. If the D300S is 24 million pixels, I will not hesitate to choose it!

be omitted

I like to shoot birds. The original 300 mm f4 lens of the d700 is too short. When the d7100 was launched, I was very happy. The focus was increased to 1. 5 times, it becomes 450mm, if you want to add another 1. Three times of loading and cutting will become more than 580 mm. I did not hesitate to start (but I rarely use 1. 3 times of loading and cutting, because that is equivalent to wasting the area of recording media. The dx machine will become a pocket camera after loading and cutting again. It is better to rotate and reload later to make the bird's posture and position suitable than to load and cut during shooting). However, a very prominent problem was found in the use that the number of consecutive shots was too small (not that the continuous shooting speed was not fast enough). When the bird flew to the nearest place and the picture was the clearest and most exciting, it could not hold down and stopped working. This was never encountered when I used the d700 to shoot birds, and I mistook it for focusing, After checking the instructions, it was found that the cache was insufficient. A 95mh Sandisk high-speed memory card was replaced, and the storage speed was accelerated, but the number of consecutive shots was still very small. This was barely acceptable when shooting in jpeg format, but only 4 in raw format. After 4, it became very slow. This is the biggest obstacle to bird hunting. Why, I have to restrain my emotions, control the timing, and press the shutter when the bird is near. To avoid that when the best time comes, the cache is full and the shutter cannot be pressed. I also remind friends that the number of consecutive snapshots of the cache marked in the manual is bragging, but actually it does not reach)

There is a flaw in the beauty, which is fatal

High cost performance ratio, which can be said to be the machine king in the current ASP picture

About three months after purchase, I bought a single camera equipped with a small spittoon with a fixed focus portrait head and a Shima 17-50. Sometimes I can't handle it correctly when shooting. Maybe the lens is a little incompatible, and I'm not very satisfied with the film. Later, I went to the original 70-300vr medium and long focus camera, and the color and sharpness were significantly higher than the first two. I suggest you go to the original camera, The auxiliary factory may have some problems. The machine itself is fine. It's just that I haven't played much in recent months. I found a mildew spot on the lens. I can't stand obsessive-compulsive disorder. The humidity in the south is heavy. I suggest you put it in a ventilated place

It's quite good on the whole. I can practice too much as a novice. I will turn to full picture later, with three films of Shima 1750 and three films of Nikon 70-300vr

24 million pixels, 51 focus points, 1.3 times cutting control, very user-friendly, almost complete the operation without entering the main menu, focusing speed is very fast, the viewfinder has a wide field of view, which is very useful for capturing, and the video is also very good

The biggest disadvantage is that it is dross. It is obviously visible at aperture 13. The sensitivity and sharpness are almost not improved compared with D90

If it doesn't fall, it should be Nikon's strongest half frame model

The various modes provided with the camera are very easy to use, and can complete the best shooting with almost no manual work. The quality of the picture is better than expected, and the high sense is also very good!

The shutter is slow in landscape mode.

Daily photography is absolutely enough. If you are diligent enough to shoot professional blockbusters, there is no problem. If you have a good tool, it depends on your carelessness. In general, the body is absolutely powerful. Another good lens is very good. I use Shima wide-angle 17-50, and feel it is perfect to shoot scenery.

Good focus,
Moderate pixels.

The price is falsely high,
The quality and workmanship of the fuselage are average.

The price hyped by unscrupulous businessmen is too high, which is not in line with its quality. A further reduction of 1500 can start.

Powerful body performance, high-speed continuous shooting, high pixels, excellent high sense performance, obvious progress in image quality compared with previous models, especially the portrait performance is more three-dimensional, star shooting is very brilliant, the scenery is more sharp, and the dynamic range of light and shadow is higher and closer to the effect of human eyes

Not touch screen, slightly smaller

You can experience the improvement of image quality and sharpness brought by the latest non optical low-pass filter. The positioning of the fuselage can be very good and cost-effective

The picture conforms to the original scene

Poor sensitivity

I don't need to say much. I've said a lot about the benefits of various companies. It's really a good function

When the handle is held, there will be a feeling of looseness. The gap inside the battery box is large, and you can even see the internal metal parts or circuit boards.
The general customer service in Shanghai was also unable to explain or answer, but only said to find the local after-sales service. The after-sales service said it was not a problem. It should be a common problem. Pay attention to details. Perfect friends should be cautious when buying.

The machine functions well, and there is a problem with the design or production quality control

Powerful performance, as DX series, impeccable!

In terms of appearance and workmanship, it is regrettable that the gap is too large after the inner flash is closed, and the gap on the left and right sides is seriously asymmetric, which is inconsistent with the machine in the propaganda picture. It doesn't match the price and level of 89000! Hopes the manufacturer can solve the problem reasonably!

Satisfied with the performance, with the regret of workmanship!

1. Fast auto focus
2. Sharp picture quality
3.24.1 million pixels with 50 fixed focus imaging to restore sharpness.

1. The non original lens has a slight out of focus, such as Sigma 501.4, which can be fine adjusted in the AF of the fuselage
2. The price is slightly higher than the port version 6000
3. Only a good head can play to the limit of image quality.

The cost-effective model is worth starting with.

The focus of the image quality stick is the same as that of the D4 d800, which is much better than that of the d7000. The noise reduction is slightly worse

The noise reduction at night is a little poor. It would be better to add some better ultra wide-angle lenses

I'm satisfied. In terms of performance, small and medium-sized studios are enough, unless you compare them with others with extra money