Comments on Canon 650D (18-135mm STM)

1. The focusing speed is good, and the capture is good when the light is good. 2. Touch screen, which is really very useful. Some people think that the whole touch screen of SLR is flashy, like a mobile phone, which is not as affordable as the shoulder screen. But the touch screen is really convenient. First, put the camera on the ground to shoot, focus manually, and click OK. Second, Door B uses the screen to touch to start, and then touch to end, There is almost no vibration. The effect of shooting the moon with a long focus is better than that of the shutter line. In addition, the full screen focusing can be performed with the touch screen, which is more accurate. 3. The keys are arranged reasonably and clearly, and the video gear is not easy to be touched by mistake. 4. The hand feel is good, small and light, but friends with big hands may appear a little small. 5. In the category of entry-level machines, the high sense is still OK, and the ISO film produced in 12800 can still be seen, which is not as good as Huachengxiang. The high sense is definitely better than the 7D, which is actually measured. 6. The camera has a high degree of adjustment. You can adjust various modes of the body to achieve the desired effect. The 71800 pixels are enough. The light is good. If you don't shake your hand, it will be sharp when you zoom in to the original size. 8. The price is relatively acceptable. 9. The workmanship is quite good, and the appearance is round. 10. The picture quality is good.

1. The entry machine has something in common. It has a strong sense of plastic. 2. The frosted surface is easy to shine or scratch after a long time of use. 3. The size of CMOS is a little smaller than that of Nikon entry-level computer. 3. I still feel less focused. 4. The focus display of the viewfinder is faster than that of real-time viewfinder, and real-time viewfinder is easy to lose focus. 5. The original battery is not very powerful. It is not as good as the endurance of the Pinsheng later bought.

This is a fairly good entry machine that touched your family. You deserve to own it. I think it's cheaper than 700D. I recommend it. It's a good machine for beginners. It's also very good as a household SLR. However, online shopping is not recommended. Many people are cheated to buy refurbished machines in the post bar

Compared with the 600D, the DIGIC 5+image processor is used, and the continuous shooting can reach 5 pictures per second. The focusing is the same as the 60D, and the sensitivity can be expanded to 25600. I hope that the high sensitivity can be improved. The touch screen allows many parameters to be directly selected, saving the trouble of pressing the Q key and direction key. I mainly care about these. Others, such as phase detection and contrast detection focusing during real-time display, dual channel microphone, handheld night view, and HDR are all floating clouds, which are rarely used by me at ordinary times. They are just personal habits and opinions. Don't shoot.

I haven't used it yet. I don't know what to say. It's too expensive when it just came into the market

After saving nearly a year's money, I originally planned to buy 600D when the price of 600D dropped sharply after 650D was listed. Later, when I looked at 650D parameters, it was really messy. Just now, I saw on the forum that 650D was listed. I will wait for another half a year. I will start again after the price drops in the off-season in December. Anyway, I have endured it for almost a year. Why not wait for another half a year! I can bear it!!

1. There are newer processors than 600D.
2. The capacitive touch screen meets the taste and usage habits of the post-90s generation.
3. Video capture function is good.

1. The price is outrageous, and there is much room for decline.
2. Plastic body, no feeling.
3. The sensor is the same as 550D and 600D, no progress! The price is still so expensive!

It's better to wait until the off-season comes and the price is appropriate

Screen rotation and touchable screen
But many simple things become very complicated
And the automatic is not very sensitive

Today, a Shenzhen user revealed that the 650D camera he had used three times at home was bought in Gome, and the leather was faded as it was when the 650D camera left the factory in June, so he quickly checked the date and found that it left the factory on July 5, 2012. The notice was sent to Guangzhou for replacement. I hope that if you buy this camera, you can check whether there are similar problems.

I don't understand why the 650D produced from May to June 15 was recalled due to discoloration, and the 650D produced in July has similar problems. Is it possible that the recalled camera still flows into the Chinese market after being repaired. China's rights protection activities should be taken into consideration. In fact, after their customers find problems, we will let them pay their own money or other ordinary customers are afraid of our damage, and have not provided relevant after-sales services.

The advantages are as shown in the question. Everyone has said it. I don't think it's necessary to say the performance. Although it's a plastic fuselage and there are not many skins, please compare it with the 60D and 600D. The design of the skin on the right side of the operating ramp behind the fuselage is much more reasonable than them!

This model supports RAW+JPG output at the same time, which is a good function, but it cannot adjust the size of files in both formats when output at the same time. Because if it is RAW+JPG, I think it is better to use the maximum resolution for RAW, and then the minimum resolution for JPG. In this way, when viewing JPG, it is faster, and the bad ones will be deleted directly, and the good ones will be processed again. So this is a little pity. It's easy to implement the above functions!

In general, a good machine!

It is the first choice for entry. The processor is very powerful, the focusing system is powerful, and the handheld night shot and HDR mode are very powerful. The films taken are very impressive. Xiaobai can also produce good films. This is the advantage of 650D over the previous generation of SLR, and the gap is not a bit! The display screen is very clear, and the flip screen is very practical. Although the fuselage is plastic, it has done a good job in many aspects, and the safety protection work is also very good.

The battery life is a little poor compared with other SLRs. After all, the touch screen is there. Occasionally, I can shoot about 400 pictures by turning on the flash light, but it is much better than the card machine. You need to buy a spare battery when you travel. There are many fake batteries. Be careful to identify them.

The processor and focusing system are very powerful, and the new functions are very practical. Xiaobai can produce large films directly.

This camera has a full touch screen, which is easy to operate. It feels good, and the sharpness of taking pictures is very good. It feels good, and is a good entry model!

Although it is an upgraded version of Canon 600D, the overall improvement effect is not obvious. All hardware of Canon 600D is still used.

This machine is very suitable for novice and home shooting. On the whole, this machine is good. Especially for the rotating screen, you don't have to lie on the ground to take photos. Touch screen operation is more convenient.

1. It has the same cross focusing system as 60d, and the single point focusing is accurate. 2. Peripheral light correction and other functions improve the image quality
3. As for the shoulder screen, for people who are accustomed to using SLR, they can directly perform all operations on the focus screen without looking at the screen, which is faster. The shoulder screen is actually just an additional function, which is faster than familiar operation. 4. The continuous shooting speed at the middle end is only lower than the new 70d, which is good. You can capture some objects that are not moving too fast

1. The ancestral 1800 pixel chip is actually enough. If it is put in a large size, it still feels like a bottleneck. 2. There is too little focus. How can Canon compare with the D3200? Canon forces everyone to buy high-end computers because of its stinginess. In fact, the difference is very small (referring to the cost). 3. The high sense is not good enough. The pixels of the machine need not be high, but the high sense is better. This pixel is not high when converted to the whole set. In fact, it can achieve high sense technically.

The machine is enough to make a good film, but you can't do anything if others keep the ancestral secret recipe
It is profitable to buy high-end computers at a high price, so don't be superstitious about high-end computers.
Understanding the performance of the machine is really that. Psychological factors are the main factors

1 The touch screen works well. Touch focusing and touch shutter are great. It is definitely the mainstream configuration of the camera in the future;
2 Good picture quality
3 Although there is no shoulder screen, there is relevant data displayed in the optical viewfinder.
4 Focus is fast. I use four 135 sets
5 The video is very powerful. The 50P high-speed slow lens is not bad. It is perfect with the 135STM lens. Focusing can be said to be a mute effect.
6 STM lens is easy to use, with lens lock key and moderate zoom ring damping,

1 The wheel is a little dead
2. High sense is weaker than D5200
3. The workmanship and feel of the 5200 are not as good as those of the D5200, but the handle of the 5200 is too shallow
4. The shutter sound is unpleasant. Is it because I am used to hearing non SLR analog sound.
5 No panoramic scanning
6 It would be better if there were more high-speed videos

All in all, it's good. 5800 yuan for a large set of smuggled goods. My SLR camera

There is no doubt that the touch screen is excellent. I bought this machine for the touch screen.
Compact body, high pixel; It's hard to compare whether the focus is fast or not, because I haven't used any other SLR, but I personally feel that it's very fast. It's easy to focus. The dark light is also very good
And set up a dozen consecutive shots that can be very smooth.
Moreover, Canon has a large camera group, many choices, and can play slowly.

When I saw the machine for the first time, I thought it was a plastic toy. It had no texture.
The photo quality of the small set I bought is not very good. Although I know I have to change the head, I still feel a little disappointed. And the focusing sound is loud hey
It can take about 170 pictures with the screen display and about 400 pictures with the viewfinder. The power consumption of the screen is a big problem.

Many people say that touch screen is a gimmick, and 650d is a mouse. I just want to say that the times are progressing. In the first five years, can you imagine that you were using a keypad phone, but today you are holding a full screen capacitive phone?
I regret that I didn't buy the 700d product because I bought the new product instead of the old one. The prices are the same. Well, someone will come out and say that there is no difference between the two. Canon squeezes toothpaste and has no cost performance Feel free. Just be happy? exhausted or not?
After mastering some photography techniques, buy another 15-85 and 50 1.4, and play slowly.
As a novice, the overall freshness of the new SLR is more than surprise.
I hope you'd better go to the physical store to get the machine and play it for yourself before deciding whether to start.

The advantages of DIGIC 5 image processor, touch screen, video function, continuous shooting speed increase, etc. will not be repeated one by one. Many friends have mentioned them. I am personally satisfied that the 650D has a nine point cross focus and a central double cross focus function, which is a real improvement in the entry-level cameras of Family C. According to my post on the forum, 650D with 85 1.2 Jinghuang, with 1.4 1.6 aperture, can still accurately focus children's portraits indoors, and the success rate is high. The upgraded focusing system is indispensable.

Disadvantages that are not disadvantages
1. 1/4000 shutter speed is a hard injury. It's a disaster to use a large aperture in strong sunlight. Of course, for beginners, they rarely shoot with a large aperture above 2.0. It would be better if it could reach 1/8000. This is a bit wishful thinking. The manufacturer will not commit such crimes below.
2. Manual adjustment of iso can only be made in multiples. For 1002004008001600, there are fewer gears. If you want to use a gear like 500 640, it can only appear in the automatic mode, and the playability is less.

The reason why it is not a disadvantage is that these requirements are more critical for entry-level computers, because these configurations are mostly found on intermediate computers. Before I started 650D, I played 450D with my friends for more than two years. The improvement of 650D in all aspects is real, but it seems that it can no longer meet the needs of people who have played SLR for two years. But for beginners, it is a very wise choice: can change the lens, experience different shooting fun; Focusing is more powerful, and it is easier to shoot good films; Seeing is taking photos, which can understand your mind better than a card machine; Touch screen symbol sense operation...... If you are interested in photography, it is enough to lead you to the road of "poor three generations".

Easy operation and accurate focusing.

At the lowest ISO, there is still obvious noise, and the image quality is not as good as 600d

Poor picture quality

The control is fast, the focus is sharp, the feel is moderate, the touch screen is very powerful, and the endurance is also good. It is completely comparable to high-end computers, and it is worth having.

I don't think the flip screen is very useful.

Good machine, worth having.

Jackie Chan...

HDR、 The continuous focusing of multi frame noise reduction and real-time shooting (including photography) is just like that of Sony, and it is not mature. The touch screen can only set parameters, and you have to double click to confirm. Compared with Panasonic GF series, it is weak and explosive.
The focus of the 9 crosses is the same as that of the Pentax three years ago.

It turns out that Canon learned to make cameras.

The auto focus system and processor have been upgraded, and the touch screen has been used to improve the continuous shooting speed.

The EOS550D, EOS600D, and EOS60D sensors are still used. Three generations share the same sensor, and the image quality is basically unchanged.

In addition to the touch screen, the upgraded auto focus system and processor, as well as the improved continuous shooting speed, are of little significance to photography lovers, because the sensor, the core part that determines the image quality, has not changed. The EOS650D is still mediocre. Friends with EOS550D and EOS600D don't need to buy EOS650D, they should wait for EOS70D.

I just want to throw up those who say this is not good and that is not good! The photography itself is not proportional to the equipment. If you don't have the technology to give you 5D5, you can't take a shocking picture. In fact, most of us can only use 5 million or even 2 million pixels for this 18 million pixel image. We can flip the touch screen, add my favorite high-definition camera, and see Canon change the video switch position, which shows that we are very sincere about this. As a rookie, I really don't want to say anything. Learn to appreciate tolerance and support

I regret not buying a SYM silent motor lens to shoot video!

My favorite is looking at him every day. He is very excited. He will take good photos when he has a good chance!

The upgraded video can focus automatically. Good @ The auto focus system and processor have been upgraded, and the touch screen has been used to improve the continuous shooting speed.

There is not much room for upgrading. On the contrary, the touch screen is operated. One hand is responsible for holding the camera firmly, and the other hand gently touches. The left hand is too tired, and the right hand is a little sore. It is better to use both hands equally and use the keys to operate the left and right balance humanely. The touch screen is the reverse of human-oriented technology. Some people don't think about it. I heard that touch screen is a good thing!

In short, the upgrade is not big, and the actual application of the touch screen is not good

Focus quickly. The touch screen is very intuitive. You don't need to press the direction key up and down.

The viewfinder range is not 100%, there is no shoulder screen, and it is easy to touch the setting key by mistake when holding it with one hand

Overall, I felt it was good and suitable for beginners like me

Not to mention the photographing function, its new stm lens is really quiet in focus, and the video sharpness is very high. We are not comparable to 5d2, at least equal to 7d. In addition, the heating condition of long lens is far better than 550d and 600d, and also better than 60d. Flipping the touch screen is also easy to use, and you can easily view videos and photos with your fingers~~~

Plastic body, hard damage~~~The price is not affordable, and the sensitivity cannot compare with 7d and 5d2~~~~

Very good model, supporting 650d~~~