Comments on Canon 5D Mark III (24-105mm)

It is necessary to have a heavy body. It looks noble and professional without flashing. The shutter sound is crisp and pleasant. High sense and workmanship leave the D800 several streets behind. In terms of image quality, 5D3 and D800 are on a par.

Price or price.

I didn't want to compare the 5D3 with the D800 at first, but Nikon users don't know whether it is to trust or for some other reason that Canon is always black in the comments. I'm a little angry, so I'll compare the 5D3 with the D800 now. First of all, the Nikon D800 internal flash makes people feel like a portal machine. There is no D4. I have two friends who use the D800. After using it for more than a year, the rubber of one handle peels, and the paint on the other body drops. There is any quality problem when using the 5D3. This should be the reason why the price of the D800 is 3000 yuan lower than that of the 5D3. The high sensitivity is much better than the D800, and the focusing speed is also faster than the D800. As for pixels, what size of photos do you want to put? The picture quality is comparable, which is why Canon has more users than Nikon. In fact, photography does not need to worry about the quality of the camera. The best is the one that suits you. Low end cameras can also take amazing photos. In general, the 5D3 camera is very comfortable to use, and the quality is very assured.

Although it is a machine five years ago, the imaging effect is quite good with 2230w pixel support. Ancestral CMOS praise. It provides two shooting modes (prism mode and screen mode) as well as video shooting support, although it is not 4k (Hong Kong and Zhenjiang 4k merged eggs) home recording dance only needs to buy a tripod. In addition, compared with 50d, the shutter is lighter

The cost performance ratio is slightly lower. At the end of last year, it cost more than 21000 meters to buy it in Japan. Without WIFI support, you need an eyefi card or an e-share card to connect with your mobile phone. There is no built-in flash. Later I learned that high-end SLR does not have built-in flash. Later I bought 270ex2 in China, which is really great. In addition, the screen cannot be reversed, and the tripod needs to be adjusted when recording the house dance

Those who wanted to invest in 5d4 invested in 5d3 because of insufficient funds. I bought it to learn how to shoot. In addition, daily shooting is enough. In addition, the price of 5d3 has been reduced recently, and friends who want to join can sell

I bought a camera purely for home use and knew nothing about photography, so I felt that I started from home. One month later, I clicked about 300 photos. I used 500D before, mainly to shoot children. Because of the legendary powerful focus and high sense, I chose 5D3. The lens is 24-105 in the set, which is much better than the previous 500D. The picture quality is excellent and the focus is more accurate, It's perfect to shoot static objects. High sense is really good, which is very useful. The body workmanship is much better than that of the 500D, and the weight is acceptable. Usually, fixed focus is used. I don't think it's stupid, but it's very heavy to install a socket. The image is clear and sharp. I think it's just right. Like the D800E, I feel uncomfortable looking at it. The video shooting quality is high. As for the continuous shooting speed, I never use it and don't evaluate it. I think the key position design is user-friendly and easy to use. Some key functions can be customized, which is more convenient to use. It should also be an advantage to support two types of memory cards at the same time.

The accuracy and speed of the focusing of the socket head are different from what was expected. The original small spittoon will be better, but it is not as powerful as the legend. This is mainly reflected in the difficulty of focusing when children are running, and most pieces are pasted. Even if the rack is used, the light is sufficient, and manual and automatic servo methods are used to capture high-speed moving objects, it is still difficult. Maybe the technology is not good? In research, or the head? It's really envious to see the clear high-speed moving objects photographed by other journalists, so I can't shoot them. A child can't stop him from exercising. And why is the shutter sound so loud? PIA PIA can even feel the vibration. Is yours the same? Or individual differences? No flash in has no impact on professionals, but it's a pity for the family. The price of this machine is not low, but there is no WIFI module. If it can support WIFI to connect to the computer, it is more convenient. Repeated card pulling and inserting always feel that the camera may be damaged. The problem of not recognizing the memory card sometimes occurred after the previous 500D. The card replacement is invalid, and it needs to be inserted and dialed repeatedly several times. Video shooting can't focus automatically. Press auto focus, the child pulls the bellows as soon as he runs away from the spittoon, and simply turns it manually. It's good to shoot scenes with fixed depth of field, and it can make naughty children feel tired and crazy when they are in a hurry. The other is the bright spot problem. Take a full black picture with the sensitivity of 3200 in 30 seconds, and turn off the high sensitivity noise reduction. There will be many bright spots. Some netizens say that there are stars in the sky. I have tested SONYF717 and NK D300S, and there are almost no bright spots. This may not affect the use, but I am worried about whether it will become more and more

On the whole, it is a relatively satisfactory machine. For household users, what they need is a machine with good picture quality, easier operation, faster and more accurate focusing. Among non professional machines, the 5D3 should be relatively close to this requirement. Maybe the expectation was too high before, and there was a gap between the focus and capture. Maybe the operation was skilled, It should be more handy.

As the title said, I couldn't afford such a professional SLR camera when I was in school, so I used a Sony consumer grade camera at that time. Later, I used the 5D and 5D Mark 2 of photographers' teachers and friends. I loved them when I used 5D at first, and finally bought my beloved 5D series with my own money after work, from the first 5D to the third generation, I think a lot of photographer friends should have some sympathy for this kind of harvest, and many friends who will become photographers may also have some understanding. As for why we like a series for so many years (of course, other Canon series, including the lower X0D and the higher 1D series, have their own favorite places), it has a lot to do with the style of Canon cameras, the positioning and price of this camera, as well as my personal use experience.
Canon's sense of operation is one of my favorite features. In contrast, I have used Nikon, but I don't like or get used to the operation of Nikon cameras. Of course, the styles of the two brands will not be discussed here.
I partially agree that Canon is suitable for taking portraits. I agree because Canon's style is really "soft", and the default sharpness is not that high compared with Nikon, so it is easy to hide some flaws in the portraits. However, the reason why we say "part" is because many things are adjustable, so you can't say that Nikon with high sharpness is not suitable for taking portraits. It is also possible to adjust it, At the same time, Canon has no problem shooting scenery, and adjusting some sharpness or scenery mode will not disappoint you.
In addition, as far as the 5D Mark 3 I use is concerned, I am quite satisfied with its endurance. I won't say much when I hear the shutter sound. Naturally, it will be much better than the low-end one.
As a high-end professional SLR, the performance of Mark3 is still worthy of recognition, although there are 5D Mark4, 5Ds, 5DsR and other brother level products.

Although I like it very much, I would not hesitate to say its shortcomings. After all, no one is perfect and no machine is perfect. Let's talk about some inconvenient places I usually use. First of all, as a medium and high-end SLR, the whole body will be heavy, which may be a big taboo for portability, but as long as you want to buy it, you have to endure this problem. So I don't recommend buying it for friends who just go out to play. You will go out to play once, Don't want to take it out the second time; For those who are really determined to take photos, let's talk about it. After all, it is easier to maintain stability when taking photos, especially on the square tripod when the fuselage is heavier.
In addition, the 5D has not been born with a set-top flash since the birth of the series, so if you want to play, remember to prepare an external flash. The original Canon flash will be more expensive. You also need to think about this fund. It is not just a single machine, not only a single machine+lens package, but also a flash lamp, a tripod, and...... As photography is deep as the sea, photography is poor for three generations, I didn't mean to say that. For a non professional photographer, your determination is enough and your demand is not so great. I must think clearly.
Now, the 5D Mark3 does not support wifi, which is a little backward. It is not convenient to use it if you want to share it quickly.
In addition, the 5D Mark3 is still using the CF card. The CF card slot and the SD card slot still occupy a little space. Generally, only the SD card is enough.
There is also a critical point. If flip screen is supported, it can bring many aspects in many cases.

As mentioned above, my overall recognition of the 5D Mark3 is still very high. After all, it is one of my dream models and a proof of my stage goals. To sum up, if you don't usually have many opportunities to take photos, or your determination is not so great, and your funds are not so abundant, then I suggest you to think twice. Maybe the X0D series, which is a little low-end but still has special characteristics, is also good. Although it is not a full picture like 5D, you may want to shoot farther, and it is more affordable; For friends with professional needs, there is no need to struggle. This is a must buy. Of course, now you can buy sR directly, instead of focusing on 3.

Good hand feel, easy operation, easy to use. The imaging effect is good. The full frame camera brings clear and sharp photos with high color rendition, adding color to the works. Abundant interfaces and camera functions can meet daily needs.

There is no wifi function, and the built-in screen cannot be flipped. The screen display effect is also average, and the technology configuration is slightly backward, which also brings some points to the convenience of operation. Also, the installation and unloading of the lens is not very convenient. The spiral lens mounting has a little wear on the bayonet, which is not a special need. It is recommended not to change the lens frequently.

The price is a little expensive. The machine has been used for several years, and there is no discount. But it is also official that his value preserving ability is more precious, with fine work, reasonable function and button design, easy to learn and easy to use. A good classic, worth having.

The screen focusing video function is much better than Invincible Rabbit.

The picture quality is not soft, the so-called sharp, solid. But why do you want to be so sharp when shooting small and fresh beauties? The adjustment of raw is also sharp, and it can't be adjusted back, which is the reason of the camera. The image quality mimics the 1DX, but the quality is far from good. Compared with the invincible rabbit, the image quality of beautiful portraits is completely backward, which is a mixture of Nikon and Canon! I admire Canon so much. You can go backwards even if you are good at taking pictures! I saw that several films released by Little Fresh Master after he changed to Invincible III are no longer soft and beautiful. They are all the same color mixing in the late stage, but the effect is much worse! Funny laymen think that more sharp is good. Only the 1DS series can be relied on for its firmness. After the 5D3 is more sharp than the Invincible Rabbit, it can only make the Invincible Three more digital!

After watching Invincible 3+1dx, we are completely disappointed. Canon has started to copy Nikon. Next, we will prepare Invincible Rabbit+1ds3 dual computers

5DIII has been used for several months, and it is still convenient and smooth in operation, with good screen size and vision. The 3.2 "1.04 million pixel screen image restoration is more accurate and delicate than the second generation, and the left mode wheel increases the locking button to avoid errors. 61 point focusing, including 41 cross focusing points, greatly improves focusing accuracy and response speed! Of course, there are 6 consecutive shots per second, although I won't use it often (depending on the shooting theme). It is needless to say that HD video supports 30 frames. CF and SD dual card support is a matter of conscience. You can use the idle SD card. Of course, it is necessary to use high-speed CF! The metal fuselage can cope with ordinary water, dust and shock. The weight is still heavy. In general, it is balanced in all aspects. According to the statistics made at the Russian Winter Olympics this year, 5DIII is the second largest among all journalists, and 1DX is the first.

The disadvantage is that I hope Canon can lighten the fuselage of this series in the future, and my arms are still tired after a day's use with Little White Rabbit. No problems have been found in other aspects for the time being. The 5D series products are well known for their mature design and will be improved from generation to generation. There is only relative perfection but no absolute perfection. For photography itself, 5DIII is worth buying.

Canon 5D3 is a machine capable of photography, entertainment and creation.

Strongly recommended, excellent picture quality, and very decisive focusing

The airframe price is not friendly enough, hope to reduce the price

Excellent picture quality, balanced performance, excellent focusing, good high sensitivity and slightly expensive price

1. The focusing speed is quite fast. I think it is too obvious when I upgrade from 60d. 2. The magnesium alloy body is very solid, and the weight is necessary. 3. It is practical to increase multiple exposures. 4. The high feeling is very good. It lasts for 60 days. ISO has never dared to go to 800. Now 1600 is used casually.

1. My m key is a bit loose. I don't know if this is the problem. 2. The price is a little expensive.

I mainly take portraits. I can't spot test linkage, and there is no internal flash (the previous 60 day internal flash basically didn't work). It's not a big problem. The pixel is also the highest in Jiali, and there is no obvious weakness. In short, it's easy to use, and it's standard.

The focusing ability has been greatly improved, the photometric system has been improved, and HDR and multiple exposure functions have been added. Excellent high feeling.

Compared with 5D2, it has little improvement in pixels and is not as attractive as D800 and D800E. There is no point measurement linkage, but this is a small matter. There is no Wi Fi function added. Although it is not easy to transfer photos, the shutter cable is not required for remote shooting of mobile phones. JPG imaging style is slightly different from 5D2.

The 5D3 feels like the combination of the previous 5D2 and D700, which can fully meet the needs of ordinary photography lovers and photo shooting. However, Canon still has some reservations about it. Judging from the image quality of 1DX under 18 million pixels and 100000 iso, Canon has the ability to make higher pixel CMOS. These restrictions on 5D3 can be said to be for commercial purposes.

1. Good focusing ratio 5d2, 2. New functions such as multiple exposure, HDR, 3 There are mode locks and multi-function locks, so there is no wrong operation. My 5d2 is just because there is no one. When I met it and changed to B mode, I took a night's waste film. I am dying. 5d3 won't be. 4. It is very convenient to zoom in. 5. The video has a dedicated key, which is very powerful. The key function is easier to use than 5d2. 6. It is very convenient to have an electronic level. 7 There is a double card box with a leather cover that is more high-end than 5d2. In short, it was bought back, and it has not been used in depth. Maybe it is just a scratch. After more use and comments, the manual is the same size as the primary school textbook, but thicker than the primary school textbook. It is qualitatively different from the manual of smuggled goods

The appearance is not powerful, high-end and luxurious enough. There is no macro mode, and the image quality is no qualitative leap. It is similar to 5d2. I haven't found anything else.

All in all, it is a good machine. The reason for 5d2 to replace 5d3 is that it has upgraded a lot, not a little. There is no problem in choosing 1dx and 5d3. I originally went to buy 1dx, but finally chose 5d3. Nothing is the best photo of a non professional machine at present. I am not a professional photographer. Buying 1dx is a waste of functions, So after seeing these two computers, we immediately decided that 5d3. The instructions are much more advanced than the 5d2. The 5d2 instructions are not at the same level as the 5d2 instructions at all. The specifications of the smuggled goods are photocopies, the same size as the 5d2 instructions, but the quality is very poor. The 5d3 instructions are the same size as the primary school textbooks, and it is too late to read the instructions.
There is only a gap of thirteen thousand between the Bank of China and the smuggled goods. It is recommended that friends who want to enter the Bank of China should enter the Bank of China, so that they can buy and use the goods with ease. I chose two smuggled goods, but I was still not very satisfied. Finally, I decided to go to the Bank of China. The original package was not unpacked, and there should be all kinds of anti-counterfeiting codes and other anti-counterfeiting signs. Even if you don't have to choose one, you should be reassured when unpacking. There are anti-counterfeiting codes to check, No anti-counterfeit code query for smuggled goods

This camera has a good handle and a hard sound. The shutter sound is crisp. The picture quality is good with high pixels. The resolution is very high. The continuous shooting speed is much faster than that of the 5D II. Therefore, it is more suitable for sports shooting and news capturing. The video bit rate is also the highest in EOS today. The 104W dot screen is much clearer than the original 92W and 23W. The shoulder screen and roller are designed very comfortably. The high sense is excellent. Generally, there are very few noise points below 6400. It is very suitable for landscape shooting and portrait shooting. Full frame camera with wide angle is much better. The processor is very new, and the 61 point focusing is extremely fast. The anti ash effect is also good. All configurations are basically the latest in today's EOS. It can be said that 1Dx is the flagship and 5DIII is the computer king. The dual card slot really increases the storage capacity. Compared with the Nikon D800, the whole machine is more comprehensive, versatile and outstanding. The endurance is also good. Generally, two batteries can last a day.

Is not having a built-in flash just a disadvantage? Such an awesome machine can get a 600EX or 580EX II. The weight is heavy, and the size is large. Maybe the photographer with small hands struggled to hold it. Anyway, I feel good. Is it a disadvantage that the viewfinder magnification is not 100%? However, you can also see the tragic feeling of the Double Hundred 7D. You are looking forward to upgrading. The mode turntable lock is really annoying sometimes. So is the 60D, which is not comfortable to use.

Such a good machine, let's forget about the 24-105 garbage lens. It's only right to get 16-35, 24-70, white cannon series and red circle focusing. Basically, everything is the best, the powerful SLR.

Compared with our own machine, it is a good camera. If we don't talk about the price, we can't help but say that focusing and even shooting are pretty good.

The comprehensive performance theory is past. But the upgrade range is not good enough.

First of all, congratulations to Canon, which has finally overtaken Nikon in terms of price in an all-round way. Then we will work harder to eliminate Zeiss. Not so kind! 1. The spot measurement is too inaccurate and the range is too large. Not to mention the light meter, it is also very easy to use the film machine with all the film. Not to mention the linkage of spot measurement, how difficult it is. I also locked the composition of AF/AE, which is my big brother in 2012. Equipped with 580 ettl points for testing, it basically depends on life. 2. Bai Buheng said nothing, hurting feelings. I sincerely advise you to take the initiative and decorate one. 3. There is no internal flash, and the auxiliary focus lamp is not added? Who goes out with 580 every day? Can 12800 iso help focus. Thousands of machines are like this, even after 5d3... In a word, Canon is really great now. An IS value of 4000 and a high sensitivity value of 10000. Five years later, it will be worth tens of thousands of dollars to move back the eye control system 20 years ago.

I asked about the market price these days, I think it is a loss for China to buy the 5D3 with a ticket of 24000. It is expensive to shoot the video for more than 6 seconds. There are 61 points for focusing. The ISOISO 100-25600 can be expanded to 50-102400. Another advantage is that it is 2000 cheaper than the D800. This time, the D800 must be more expensive than the 5D3. I have not seen the video. If you want to make a video with so much money, I suggest you buy a video SLR to take photos Lamellar

14 million pixels less than the D800 according to the competitors in the market. There was a man who made up a story. He said the picture quality was good. My feeling was that Canon's face was soft and beautiful. Honestly, the D800 was more ordinary. As for the scary ISO data, in fact, the photo quality was about 50000 times less than the D800, which means that the shutter life was about 50000 times less than the D800. These data indicate that the quality is not as good as the D800. The D800 plus external connection The shutter of the device is not slower than that of 5D3. Canon gives people the impression that it is not honest to take the overlord road. Next year, if a 40 million pixel machine like 5DX comes out and buys a 5D3, we should regret it. We should wait until July to stabilize it

ISO basically 3000, few people use the price. It's hard to accept. If I'm not a lens, I'm a Canon pixel. It's definitely a loss to replace D800 pixels. But it's estimated that many buyers need to change the computer shutter. It's always less than Nikon. The price is about the same. It's really depressing, but it's also very practical. All aspects are relatively comprehensive. For me, 22 million pixels have already It's enough to wait for the price. I want you to buy the right two machines. I hope you can read more reports. I've seen a lot of Canon cameras these days, and I've played SLR for several years. I feel Canon cameras are still good. But when talking with friends about the machine, they almost saw those people who made up stories. It's shameless that the 5D3 is not as good as you say. They always talk about ISO It's also a kind of optics for that person to take photos against a few kilograms of things in darkness. We didn't buy them at night. We hope that you can consider that if it's convenient for reporters to buy 5D3, it's almost like if you don't lack money to eat photos. Photographers who eat high-quality meals still want to buy D800. I hope everyone can buy it

Finally, I realized my dream of 5D3. I urgently went to the outdoor to test the machine. I felt very good. Here I talk about my feelings. First, the sound and buttons on the shutter are very comfortable. Second, the focus is fast and accurate. Third, the picture quality. The photos taken by the prince are exquisite and have a strong sense of hierarchy. I thought the price was too expensive at the beginning, but now the price is cheaper than when I came out. I bit my teeth and finally bought them. I don't regret after using them, It's worth having. The next step is to study hard and be worthy of this opportunity. In addition, HDR and multiple exposure functions add a lot of fun

No internal flash

For photography lovers, it is a piece of equipment worth having

1) The shape, feel and key layout can be said to be a comprehensive extension of 7D, which is thick and solid, round in appearance and excellent in feel! Canon has always attached great importance to industrial design of products. Don't tell me that connotation is more important. It is more valuable to add a bit of thought to the appearance design while having connotation;
2) There is no need to say more about the internal parameters. I played for two and a half years and directly promoted it. In addition to the 7D strong focusing pleasure and shutter sound, there is no doubt about the evolution of perspective and details. As for the internal evolution, let's let 5D2 users comment

1) Very curious to join the scoring system. Although it is reasonable to exist, I haven't found how to use this function so far
2) The zoom button has been changed to N home mode. Every time you zoom in, you have to turn the index finger dial. This is not suitable for viewing photos in some quiet occasions. The biggest impact is that you take pictures in real time. The size was determined by the thumb of the right hand before, but now you are very unaccustomed to using the index finger dial. I don't know why Canon has forced Canon users to change their habits for many years
3) The number of user-defined buttons is too small to change the playback zoom button...... It's really speechless

First of all, I exclaimed how those who have not used 5D3 dare to make comments, and finally summed up: I will buy at a reduced price... What a speechless! I upgraded from half frame 7D to full frame, so I can't compare it with 5D2. However, since it is found that many 5D2 users do not understand the advantages of the full frame, and do not choose the parameters inside the machine, resulting in graying and low sharpness of the film, I think it is necessary to popularize the characteristics of the full frame machine: rich detail retention. Many film parties boast that film is more tolerant than digital, which can only be said that they do not understand the real digital, so they will strongly despise the later stage and often show off the straight map. The details of 5D3 are extremely amazing. The seemingly explosive sky can separate amazing white clouds through RAW and later stage, and the seemingly unexposed hills and forests can restore amazing levels by brightening, If you are proficient in color and digital sampling principle, RAW will export 16 to TIF in the style of "reliable setting" and then process it with PS, which will have many amazing effects. In the final analysis, the camera is still the picture quality, and any powerful body function is an auxiliary means. Only with a fixed L head on the 5D3 real teeth, can it be used to the limit. So those who laugh at the lack of progress in 5D3, please immerse yourself in learning the principles of the later stage. The digital camera itself is fighting with the later stage. Don't think that the photos after the later stage are not photos, just like seasoning is necessary for cooking.

This camera is a full frame camera with powerful functions, excellent performance and easy operation. It is not too much to describe it as "no gap to hit". It can take good pictures even in low light. The existing pixels can fully meet the use requirements of people.

The camera body is heavy, but it is not a disadvantage. It just reflects the quality of the camera body. The drawback is that the batteries produced by the subsidiary factory cannot be registered, but can be used. After all, quite a few people use batteries from the auxiliary factory.

The quality of the camera is absolutely excellent and reliable. Please note that when purchasing, you must choose the merchant designated by Canon's official website. You must not be greedy for bargains, and you must not buy the products of sellers whose prices are too low. Even if you open the box and verify the 16 digit color number and the 3-code integration, you should also verify the authenticity of the camera warranty card in the box, and verify the paper quality and printing level of the card. After purchasing the machine, it is better to go to Canon designated quick repair point for product authenticity and quality certification.

Focusing has reached the top level of C, so there is no need to regret any more. This should be the biggest highlight. The second one, I think, is the processor D5+, which is dozens of times more powerful than 5DII. According to the official statement, the visible results of these dozens of times are: fast and accurate focusing, clearer pictures, and support for six consecutive shots at 22.3 million pixels. Third, it has improved the high sense quality. I don't fully agree with the above statement. The 25600 high feeling is useless. In fact, this is to improve or maintain the picture quality of 6400, just as f1.4 may not be commonly used, but it can maintain the sharpness of 2.8.

Personally, the biggest disadvantage is the camera function. My current SLR and camera functions have never been used, nor have I tried to use them. I guess that anyone who can afford to buy more than 15000 SLRs can afford to buy high-definition cameras, such as a high-end home machine that costs more than 8000 yuan and a red circle lens. If I can choose, I would rather let Family C remove the camera function, and the rest of the money to improve the 5DIII camera function, which is the main business, which is the fundamental.

Anyone who can afford a 1kg SLR can afford a camera ten times more powerful than the 5DIII camera. Why? Concentrate on waiting for 5Dx, alas

It's a little obvious. You can see yourself without using it!

The disadvantage depends on who uses it!!

Now the SLR has generally become a civil aircraft, and all that can be used or not can be bought. From a commercial point of view, no matter whether it can be used or not, as long as it is applicable, it is a good machine, so it must sell very well!! Compared with 500D and D3100, who can still talk about 5D3 and D800. What I want to say is that I am a novice, but if the 5D3 is in my hands, it has been able to play far beyond my ability! This shows that he is not suitable for me now, and I will also position this camera at the camera that may be acquired in the future, because of lack of money and poor technology! But to meet these two aspects, I will not hesitate to start! Just because C's operating feel is more suitable than N's, it's natural to choose 5D3 on high-end computers! Applicability and practicality are the king's way!
There is also the problem of pixels. It is clear whether there are more professional photographers or fans. Don't be fooled by the 8 million pixels on the mobile phone. I remember that in 2007, my family bought a digital camera with 500W pixels. Although the price is 3400, I still think it is very beautiful when I look at the photos of that meeting, At that time, I also made a comparison with the SLR photos taken by my classmates from my father. At that time, I took the sports meeting, and his photos were obviously dark, and I could not feel the advantages of the SLR photos developed with ordinary sizes. Obviously, I would not use the SLR, and the results were even more unsatisfactory! No matter how good the pixels are, they can't make up for the word "appropriate"!
Whether they sell well or not is sure to sell well. People are waiting to see how many people will come to the new product fairs of C in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, depending on their historical growth experience! From the perspective of Canon alone, even 550D and 600D, I believe that many people will choose 600D when they are fully rich, while those with little money will still wait for the money or price reduction to buy! If you can't afford to buy a 5D2 now, or buy a 5D3 out of a 5D2, the rich will definitely go straight to the 5D3, or 1DX and so on. In the final analysis, it is still a saying that you are not a collector, so choose the right machine, and don't go astray, hehe! There is no regulation on 600D photos in the photo contest, so they won't win the prize! The camera, head and operation are not S!
It feels that the 5D3 is a very stable machine, while the 1DX is a "fast" machine in configuration! Very selective and compensatory!
There is so much bullshit. If the machine is good, it's natural to think about it comprehensively! Let's be honest!

100% viewfinder, excellent focusing system, professionally controlled body shortcut keys, and high-quality workmanship.

The design needs to be more lightweight, and the electronic performance can be greatly improved,

The balance of Tai Chi's unity of opposites is my pursuit, so I chose Canon. The balance of the invincible parachute is relatively good. The most prominent is the balance between the pixel and the body speed, followed by the balance of creativity affected by the shooting, as well as the balance between the shutter life and the moderate continuous shooting speed. If there is any imbalance, it is the limitation of modern technology. The portability of the fuselage is a trend, which needs to be strengthened. The mechanical performance is excellent, but the electronic performance is not very strong. From the perspective of screen focusing, it is even worse than DC. It should be better in the future. Flipping the screen is controversial in many cases, but I think comfortable shooting can better bring creativity into play. Canon may be too conservative here. I use α 55 for half width machines and RX100 for portable machines. Personally, they are both balanced choices. As amateurs, the range of applications for buying machines is not fixed, and there are few targeted performance requirements. This may also be the reason for choosing balanced machines. Each has his own needs. Write them out for reference. Don't mislead everyone.