Comments on Nikon D800E (single machine)

It is high in appearance. The effect is different when it is photographed. The workmanship is very fine.

On the other hand, the handshake is not as comfortable as the D750.

In 2014, the D750 just came into the market, and I felt that more than 2000 yuan was enough. I ordered it, but I didn't see the real machine. At first, I wanted to buy the D800. My teacher said that the 800 was too heavy, and it was high. The computer was hard to operate, so it was difficult to control. So I ordered D750 and took pictures with my master. The contrast between his D800 and the two cameras was very big. No matter how hard I tried, the D750 could not produce the effect of D800. The 750 was not a professional camera of the same level as the D800. I really regret it. The D750 and I have been together for two years, but I soon disposed of it. When I bought the D800, the effect was different. The focus was fast, the picture was clear, and the potential was great in the later stage. The only problem is that they are biased. The handshake is not as comfortable as the D750. I'm busy recently, but I haven't taken any pictures. I took some pictures with two cameras. Please identify them. It shouldn't be difficult to distinguish them.

The advantage is that 36 million high pixels bring high resolution, which is the charm of 800; The focus system is very powerful. The main purpose of abandoning the D800 on the D600 is the focus system; Operation. I like Nikon's operation. It depends on the individual; The workmanship is excellent and the price is affordable; Metering, exposure control and flash system are really higher than 600

The disadvantage is 36 million pixels. Such a high pixel brings two problems: 1. The data pressure is too high, and the continuous shooting is very slow. There are only four images per second without cutting; 2. Under the same level of production technology, under the same sensor area, such a high pixel density, high sense image quality is not ideal, not to mention worse than 5D3, worse than D600. Of course, after I actually got the machine and used it, I found that it is better than expected, after all, it is full, and the difference between high sense and D600 is not the difference in level.
As a professional machine, the D800 has abandoned automatic functions such as AUTO mode, AF-A focusing mode, and SCAN scene mode, which are no longer convenient for families to use.

In general, the D800 is an excellent main SLR, but it is not a main model with comprehensive performance, which is the main reason why its price is different from the 5D3. As the original Nikon user, if there is no choice, and if there is financial strength, the D800 is definitely the best choice. If new users want to reach the goal in one step, they can feel the models of Nikon and Canon before making a choice. Whether they need a Canon 5D3 with comprehensive performance or prefer the Nikon D800 with tough operation and super high pixels.

High pixels, coupled with the best fixed focus lens, can make you shocked. The post clipping space is very large. The sunny and clean days are impeccable, killing the whole family.

It has to be equipped with a top-notch lens and a high-speed memory card. I started with a 24-120F4G, which was magnified to 100% in overcast and cloudy weather and made me want to cry. Even the pictures taken by my Canon 700D dog head were inferior. Later, I bought 35mm1.4G and 85mm1.4G before I found the feeling of a cow. This combined consumption cost me tens of thousands at a time. If you adjust the pixels to about 20 million to adapt to the lens, you will feel aggrieved. This consumption can add up to a low-end car. There is a certain reason that photography is poor for three generations.

It is strongly recommended that novices or those with limited budgets purchase this machine carefully. This machine has a full budget and strong image quality requirements. It is recommended that 24mm1.4G, 35MM1.4G, 85MM1.4G be equipped directly according to your preference. This machine has too high pixels and must practice iron hand. It is not easy for beginners to drive. Recently, they want to buy a D610 to play and let the D800 sleep. It's purely personal. People with different views should not be too serious.

Nikon D800 came into the market in February 2012 and started in April. Now it can buy the fuselage+2470. About two years of experience: Nikon D800-36.30 million high pixels are the best in the field of SLR in 2012. The accurate and convenient 51 point focusing system and new image processor make it a breakthrough in high definition and image quality. Dynamic range, 1080 HD camera effect is good, very satisfied. The d800 is indeed a milestone of Nikon. It is a photographic machine that needs to be focused.

High sensitivity images below 1600 are available, and images above 1600 are noisy and impure. The built-in dedusting effect is not ideal!

Exquisite workmanship, strong sense of metal, physical stores take out good, nickel, cable, compared with the appearance of metal feeling immediately! Personal opinion of appearance design likes this style. Others will not be discussed in detail. In a word, the D800 is a good machine!

High pixel, high image quality, high tolerance, 5 levels of underexposure can still retain the dark details, and the curve can be pulled out directly. The tolerance has no doubt that the sharpness and details are retained very well. Focusing is also very good. The old 80400 still pushes very fast. Generally, the head of the body pushes very hard. The dark focus is also very accurate, and the focusing speed is also very fast. Although the continuous shooting speed is slow, it is basically the original speed if it does not decelerate for ten seconds within five seconds.

The high feeling is average, but people who enter this machine usually don't consider high feeling. The photo file is too large. Only 32g SD card can store 400 raw photos. It's hard to hold them. The viewfinder is a bit dark, and the dark environment is a bit hard to see. As for Nikon's yellowing, there is a slight difference in the degree of color deviation for different lenses. For example, the Dazhu Cannon is better than 24-70. It's a bit of a hit.

Excellent picture quality scenery machine. There is no problem with an ordinary cover ad poster. This machine needs enough exposure time to display its power. The picture is exquisite and tolerant. It will have a better effect than other machines. Overall, it is a very good machine.

With 3600W pixels, the light sensitivity at high pixels is stronger than expected. Photos can be used when 3200 exposures are correct at low light. The handle is better than the D3 series of the 3rd generation machine, neither light nor heavy. With alloy ring head, the imaging effect is outstanding, the sense of hierarchy is excellent, and the tolerance is also good.

The problem caused by high pixels is that the CF card is also highly demanding. What do you use SD card for? Don't be funny. Apart from sports reporters, it should be enough for continuous shooting. I did not find any major problems when I took photos of the wedding, and the ceremony was in progress. The high sense is not as good as that of the third generation, but it is also a disadvantage of high pixels. If the white balance is not adjusted, the film will turn green and yellow.

At the same price, you can keep pace with 5D3, and you deserve it!!

The appearance is bright, the feel is first-class, the picture quality is exquisite, the focus is reliable, the battery is powerful, and the light measurement is accurate... A lot of things, I like the most important

The high feeling is relatively ordinary, and the use below 1600 still has no great impact. In addition, customers who buy the D800E are not high feeling, otherwise they will buy the D3S or 5D3. But they are not accustomed to Canon's control mode, and the noise is not obvious after the 36 million pixel thumbnail.
It's really a bit picky about the camera. The dog head and the old man are generally not fed enough. For example, the old D-shaped lens should not be used. If the details are not good, the sensor should be wasted. Of course, the G head must be used. Of course, the more expensive, the better. It's not only good for the original factory. The auxiliary factory also has a good match. I tried a dozen lenses before and after. In order to avoid being misunderstood, I will not elaborate on the lens model

I have been paying attention to it since it was listed. I finally made up my mind to start on May Day this year. Although it cost 30000 to 40000 yuan, I feel it is worth it. I am very satisfied at present

The whole machine is an advantage.

The body performance of the D800 is almost perfect. Its 36.3 million pixels are also very powerful. The photo effect is shocking. It has considerable advantages for landscape photography, commercial photography and other fields, and also provides a lot of space for later clipping. At the same time, high pixels are like a double-edged sword, which brings another problem (whether it is a disadvantage or not):
1. The file size of the photo is large, and the requirement for the memory card capacity is high. It is too card hungry;
2. Due to the limitation of the processor, continuous shooting is relatively slow;
3. They are picky about the lens, and the resolution should be high, otherwise, the performance will be affected;
4. The price is relatively high;
5. Because the pixels are too high, the high sense image quality is restricted.

In general, 20 million pixels is enough.
The D300s and D700 have not been upgraded. In addition to the D3X, there is still a gap between 12 million pixels and 36.3 million pixels in the quasi professional camera. Therefore, I think Nikon will launch an upgraded version of the D300s D400 in the second half of the year or next year. At present, more attention is paid to 5D3 than to D800. Of course, it needs to be verified by the market.
The D400 I envision is roughly like this:
1. Airframe with the same performance as D800;
2. Or full frame (full frame will be the mainstream in high-end);
3. The sensor with the same pixel as D4 (it is impossible to copy D4) or 24.5 million pixels of D3X.
Maybe, two models will be launched: full frame, the one with 16.2 million pixels is called D40024.5 million pixels is called D500, so Nikon has a complete product line. Of course, it's better to launch two models, which is also our wishful thinking.

Spot measurement linkage is extremely useful. When shooting dynamic portraits with complex and changeable outdoor environment, you can avoid the trouble of exposure locking and capture beautiful moments. Only Canon Series 1 has similar functions.

After seeing the professional sample film and the film taken by yourself with the D800, the ISO800 or above is not good. Who can use the thumbnail? Of course, you should be 100% passable. Otherwise, you should buy a low pixel one. And the dark part is poor and gray. The most serious problem is that the skin color of the characters is yellow, which is more difficult than the previous models in the later stage, and still difficult to solve.

I want to buy for the function, because I don't want to buy the color. Entanglement between 5D3 and D800

The picture quality, high sense, focus (the D800 cannot match the 5D3 in the dark), and the video are all the best at the same level. Why does someone say that the D800 does not have multiple exposures? You can set multiple exposures of up to 9 photos. If you haven't used the D800, please don't talk

Low resolution lenses, such as 28-300, have obviously blurred details when used on the D800. In fact, 24-70 can't play the high pixels of the D800. At present, it is estimated that only 85.1.4G can play a full role in D series and G series lenses, because it reaches 4000 lines

The fuselage is just a carrier, so there is not much choice. The production is mainly about the lens and composition. The color rendition of the lens and the taste of the lens, that is, the effect of the illusion is very important. Although the D800 is rich in details, the photos are based on the overall effect, and the details are less important than the composition, There seems to be a unified view in the photographic world: only obsessive-compulsive patients and paparazzi can take a picture to see the details.

The advantages of image quality, imaging, focusing and so on have been described, which are pertinent and practical. If you want to make the lens in your hand durable and can continue to use it, you have no choice but to use the Nikon machine! The D800 supports almost all Nicole lenses. Of course, the imaging color of lenses in different periods is somewhat different from that of new lenses, but it also reflects the era color of lenses, which is quite interesting.

The shortcomings were also mentioned. However, I personally think that if you are a sports reporter, you must be in D4. Amateur people can hardly use that fast continuous shooting speed. High pixel sensor, when F11 is small aperture, it is really easy to find black spots. No one is perfect. If you choose high pixels, you can spend more time blowing soot. It's not difficult.

Compared with machines of other brands at the same price, they have been used for a long time, and the durability of Nikon and Nicol is clear (135 lens German Leica and Zeiss are good, but amateurs can hardly use them). I have a Nichol 50mm F1.4 60 years ago (1954? I can't remember it clearly, it's an antique) that can be used on the D800 (manual focus, of course). The continuity of Nichol lens and its compatibility with the machine are incomparable to his family. Personal advice: It depends on the number of equipment that you buy. If there are many lenses, there is no need to change the brand; Every penny is worth every penny. You can never sell what you buy. The marketing departments of Nijia and Nijia are not working hard. The choice of products is not either that or that, according to your own actual situation.

Compared with the D800, astronomy and landscape photographers will prefer it. Nikon finally broke the monopoly of Canon's astronomical photography for many years.

The probability of moire pattern and hue shift is rising, which is difficult for novices and general photographers to control.

Today, I saw an option of Zhongguancun Online, and most people choose to buy the D800E. I am puzzled about this. So many people choose the D800E, which is really hard to understand. It may be that I am ignorant, or it may be that the current film friends are very confident in their own technology. As we all know the role of low-pass filter mirror, the sharpness of removing low-pass filter mirror will increase, but with it, the probability of moire and color shift will increase greatly. For controlling moire and hue deviation, the requirements for camera operators are very high. Nikon's sensor still uses a standard array pixel arrangement, rather than the so-called fixed pixel random arrangement of Fuji X-Pro1. I think that when you choose to buy, you should make decisions based on your current technology and shooting needs, and not too much superstitious sharpness. Relatively speaking, before the D800 was released, didn't we always praise the sharpness of the D700? Personally, I think the D800 is reserved for ordinary photography enthusiasts, and the D800E is reserved for professional photographers and enthusiasts. It may also be that professional photographers and enthusiasts make choices today, hehe. Of course, as for which model to buy, we should decide by ourselves.

The pixels are relatively high. The main advantage is that the low-pass filter is eliminated, making the image more sharp.

We all know the shortcoming, which is easy to appear the moire phenomenon, and it is not easy for ordinary people to grasp.

Why is the pixel still relatively high? In terms of pixels, the effective pixels of the Sigma SD1 APS-C 23.615.8mm CMOS digital SLR camera have reached 46 million. According to this specification, the effective pixels of the full frame should be 106.58 million. Moreover, the Sigma SD1 is the only one in the world at present. The first three-layer color CMOS, which really restores color like film, will develop in this direction in the future, Other sensors are one layer (mosaic structure), but three layer (X3 structure) CMOS. The photosensitivity principle is similar to film, so the D800e is not a high pixel camera, but it is currently out of stock on the market, so the profiteers copied it to 34000 yuan. At present, the market price in the United States is 2999 dollars. Please consider carefully if you want to sell it.

The low sense image quality is extremely good because of its high pixels and full frame. Nobody can match it. High pixels also bring the advantage of greater clipping freedom. The color is perfect, and the resolving power is particularly good as long as the sensitivity is less than 1250. The focusing system is very efficient. It is thick and comfortable to hold. The LCD screen with good effect and dual card storage are its advantages. It can be said that in addition to sports photography, it can be regarded as a divine instrument, especially scenery, portraits and plants.

Although the high sense is far from the 5D3, it is high in pixels after all, and ISO1250 is enough. How dare the 5D3 compare the low sense? High pixels restrict the continuous shooting speed, so it is slightly inferior to 5D3 in terms of comprehensiveness.

The artifact, picture quality and number of pixels are among the best.

The fuselage has excellent performance and strong waterproof and dustproof ability; The new dual axis electronic level is convenient for both horizontal and vertical strokes; Built in flash lamp with complete functions, and its wireless flash can control two groups of flash; The new 51 point focusing system can focus accurately under dim light and small aperture; The new 91200 point light metering system has its own face recognition function; A variety of tailoring modes are convenient for journalists to produce films quickly; USB3.0 interface can bring extremely high data transmission speed. There are also ultra-high pixels, full pixel magnification, and the details are still very clear.

RAW low pixel mode is not provided; The size of each photo is too large, which puts forward higher requirements for memory card and photo processing.

Almost perfect overall, no problem giving 4.6 points. There is no absolutely perfect thing in the world.

The work is solid, the imaging is excellent, and the focus of D4 is very sharp, which is definitely worth having. If you just look at the pixels and focus, there is no need to change the machine in six years, it is a machine that can be put in place without any problems.

The handle is not good. It's a little small. I can't see that it's a 2W ocean machine.
The pixels are too high, which causes pressure on the surrounding equipment for many users, and they think 24xx W pixels are just right.

This is the best work of Nikon in 2012. If you are considering it, then it is absolutely worth having. It is an overall improvement over D700. However, the requirements for photographers are also very high. High pixel "iron hand" and its requirements lead many people to feel that they must use a tripod to shoot. In terms of lens, the fixed focus lens is completely competent. It is not necessary to look at the invincible golden circle recommended by the official. What is suitable for them is OK. Finally, I wish you all a smooth purchase

13.6 million pixels is a highlight, and the details can perform very well. 2. The camera has enough weight in the hand, and feels very comfortable. 3. The lens compatibility is very good, and the film head can be used in many terminals. 4. The photo noise is acceptable under the non expanded sensitivity. 5. The CF+SD card dual card combination can make good use of the advantages of the two memory cards. 6. The color restoration is good, and the white balance and color temperature are also accurate.

1. The highest sensitivity is really not as good as D700. You should know that the pixel density is inversely proportional to the high sensitivity image quality

As an upgraded model of D700, the D800 has been upgraded in terms of pixels and other aspects. Some netizens said that the continuous shooting speed of the D800 is too slow. I have tried it. Under the condition of adding a battery box and using a 400X high-speed CF card, the continuous shooting speed of the 36 million pixel mode is 4 images per second, and the continuous shooting speed of the 24 million pixel mode is 6 images per second. In fact, 24 million pixels is enough, After all, 36 million pixels need to sacrifice a certain amount of performance. In general, the D800 has balanced its performance to make it adapt to most shooting scenes as much as possible. Many people compare 5D3 and D800. Personally, they feel that the two are not comparable. D800 focuses on high pixels, while 5D3 focuses on high sense and photography. The two focus on different areas of application. It is not meaningful to compare the two. The D800 does have a little more noise under high sensitivity. It is recommended to shoot with 36 million pixels. In the later stage, the image will be much cleaner if the image is reduced to 24 million or 18 million pixels. In short, the D800 is a classic machine, and you need some skills to use it well. The advantage of the whole picture is great, especially when using fish eyes. For the D800 and D800E, the D800 can fully meet the requirements of photography enthusiasts. If you like the late stage or pursue the ultimate picture quality, you can consider the D800E. My matching is D800+80-400mm 4.5-5.6D ED VR+24-120mm 3.5-5.6D+16mm Zenitar fisheye to Nikonka

1. High pixels, full details, and strong shock. When taking pictures with high image quality, you can use high pixels, with more space and freedom to cut. Sometimes, you can make up for the lack of a telephoto lens; When setting lower pixels for speed, the speed will naturally increase; The D800 does have a little more noise under high sensitivity, but if you shoot it with 36 million pixels, the picture will be much cleaner when it is shrunk to 24 million or 18 million pixels in the later stage, which is not inferior to competitors at the same level.
2. The focusing speed is fast, even the auxiliary factory lens is still super fast, and the picture quality is excellent.

A machine with strong personality needs high shooting skills, which is a challenge for storage and image processing.

The D800 is a classic machine with strong personality, and the quality of the mud pit lies in it.

High speed continuous shooting focuses quickly and has high sharpness. It is suitable for astronomical and landscape photography. It has super powerful video function, high pixels, high image quality, and powerful pixels, which is 3 times higher than the previous generation.

The probability of Moore pattern and color shift increases, the price is slightly higher, and the control is slightly complicated, which makes it difficult for entry-level players to get started

D800E is the first choice of ordinary enthusiasts, a little needless to say! As for the Mole pattern and other problems of the D800E, they can be processed later. Besides, these problems can only occur in specific scenarios! Therefore, the D800E is more playable, and enthusiasts have more room to play!

I am a D700 user. My first impression of D800E trial:
1. No low-pass filter, sharp imaging;
2. The pixels are relatively high, easy to edit in the later stage;
3. Gieli video function;
4. The focus is more determined than my original D700, and the image quality has been greatly improved.
5. It is lighter than the D700.

Prices are quite expensive. I haven't found any problems with anything else for the time being.

I like to shoot scenery movies, which is very suitable for me. D700+800E, two computers work together to avoid frequent lens changes, and reduce the probability of CMOS graying.
What suits you and what you like is good.