Canon 1100D comments

The image quality depends on the size of the photosensitive components. The specifications of the photosensitive components of this camera are the same as those of other cameras with a price of less than 10000 yuan. Only the processing speed and focusing speed have been improved. As for the pixels, 120000 yuan is enough. The camera function is not very useful. If you spend thousands of yuan to sell a C frame with good camera function, it would be more practical to buy another small camera

High cost performance. More practical beginner

1. Solid pictures and colors, indeed, 1200W pixels of technology are distributed,

2. Accurate white balance

3. The thick and high sensitivity 1200W pixel is really helpful for improving the sensitivity. The iso3200 is absolutely available

4. It's so cheap The plane 2500 I bought is only 2000 in terms of the machine body...... One APS-C cmos is worth 800 RMB

5. The level of the second-generation 18-55 lens has been truly improved. The sharpness of F3.5 is better than that of the first generation Seckill, and it is not weaker than that of Nikon Dog Head
It has been said before that Nikon is a dog's head but not a dog's head, and Canon is a dog's head but not a dog's head. This new 18-55 is indeed a sincere work. Some people may think that Canon will scold the material shrinkage when it changes the plastic butt for this head. In fact, if the durability of composite materials can achieve the effect of metal, lightness and cost saving, it is actually a good thing, which is the general trend. It's a joke that 18-55 itself is so light. Does anyone really want to use a walnut to identify whether it is strong and durable?

1. There is no skin at all. The hand feel is too bad. It takes a long time to pinch it, and it hurts (cheap, so this is not a disadvantage)

2. Good or bad is also the machine released in 2011, but there is not much unorthodox filter inside the machine (Cheap, which is not a disadvantage, and the filter itself is used to coax Xiaobai)

3. The screen is poor, and 23W is really too 2 (cheap, so this is not a disadvantage)

Many people don't know whether they don't understand or install X. The imaging in the APS-C frame itself is not much worse. They must think that it is better to buy a D300S or a 7D or a D700060D from 1W. The image quality is excellent. People who know more understand that it is all due to the size of cmos and cmos technology.
APS-C must have the best picture quality of Fuji X series (it is claimed that the high sense and color are comparable to the full set), and the rest of the machines are ball like, so I say that the picture quality of 1100D is the same as that of all SLRs below 1W yuan (there are many Xiaobai going to make bricks, and the dolls don't know how to spend more than 10000 yuan to buy a 7D+18-200, which should be unbalanced psychologically haha)
I used the D7000 for more than three months in my senior year last year. Maybe it's because I'm not a good person to buy a parallel machine. The machine is so high that I feel bad. The red and green noise of iso800 has broken out, and even iso200 was killed by X100iso3200 in my studio
Now, I reserve the G1X and use 1100D for the time being. My principle is to buy the cheapest body (no matter Canon Nikon) at half width, and the whole set must be equipped with N ports. The data of Dox Lab is very authoritative. You can feel what photography is, what feeling is, and what operation is only when you use the high-end Nikon.
It's already a SLR, it's all APS-C, take a good picture, and stop worrying about the high and low end of the machine. What's important is the brain behind the camera

The hand feel is good. The Nikon D3000 is much better than the Nikon D3000. It has a strong stereoscopic sense when shooting the same lens. Compared with the Nikon D3000, Canon 450D and Canon 1100D, I have all three cameras. With the same lens, the 1100 is much more delicate after all. The 450D is obviously not up to the Nikon D3000 when collecting pigments. The D3100 is much better than the Nikon D3000 or the D3100, although the pixel is not as high as the Nikon D3100, But whether a camera is good or not depends on the pixels. Hehe, let me give you a 1200W camera and take a picture, right? This camera is not only for beginners, but also for studios. Many people are annoyed. How can we shoot only 720 pixels? eldest brother!!! Is the SLR for you? That VCR factory didn't close down early? Many laymen don't understand the function? In fact, this function is sufficient for entry-level SLR, even if only 360 lines and 240 lines are available. With this function, you can connect to the computer for online shooting. This function is for real-time shooting. With this function, you can see whether your actions are natural or not when you shoot in real time, like it or not. Without this function, you can't take real-time shots. Bird buddy? Do you understand? Many people want to make good films, but good films depend on technology. Without technology, the SLR is not as good as a card machine. What the camera cannot fail to mention is the Canon creative automatic function, which can easily achieve the big function of focusing. Although there is no real level of focusing, it is for novices, photography lovers and studios

There is only one disadvantage: the fuselage is small and plastic.

I really want to boycott Japanese products, but as a Chinese after boycotting Japanese products, I don't know what cameras to buy, Samsung? Then imaging~~Forget it~~~, German goods? The price? Are you extravagant? I can buy 40 sets of 1100D. I have no choice but to choose Japanese products. It's not my fault. Let's go! Next generation, it depends on you!

The 4200 phone is red because it is a gift for my girlfriend. There is a novice introduction mode, which is quite practical. I have never used it myself. I will listen to my girlfriend's opinion in a few days. It is said that the new haircut is good

Very plastic without skin.

The color is beautiful, light, practical, or suitable for girls

Small, suitable for girls or household use

Rough workmanship, no skin, poor texture; The display pixels are too low to see the details; The lowest cost performance in the same level; Although the SLR is not used for video recording, the 720P video screen has the advantage of OUT, which is a chicken rib; Poor battery life; The picture quality is average.

Junk products, I don't know whether they are Canon products or stickers.

I have always been optimistic about Nikon, and even now I still prefer the color of Nikon. When the D3100 was launched, I searched ZOL and Wuji's posts. However, in the end, 1100d was entered. The direct reason is that I feel good after using my classmates' 1000 days, and the price advantage (3000 Taobao sets plus various accessories).

Personally, I think the advantage of this machine is one word: solid.

1. Solid pixel density, 12 million, I have psychological barriers, I think 12 million is a standard, 14 million pixels is not up or down, uncomfortable; 24 million pixels of the D3200. My computer can't keep up with it. I went through the D3200 samples and found that my computer was under pressure to browse pictures. Let's forget it. The 32G memory card I bought uses RAW+JPEG to plot. When the card is empty, more than 1000 cards will be prompted. The margin is not large. I think if the D3200 is used, the pressure on the card will also be large.

2. Solid high sense: Although this machine is positioned as a beginner, the high sense image quality is not: 1600 is fully available when the requirements are not high, and 6400 still has considerable availability.

3. Solid "depth" - 14bit digital analog conversion: the d3100 is 12bit. Theoretically, the amount of information in 14 bits is four times that in 12 bits, which can bring rich levels of performance. Ps: To be honest, I don't think the level of 1100d RAW mapping is better than that of 1000d (12bit).

4. Personally, I think Aishi Little Black Rabbit is more beautiful than Nikon 18-55VR, especially

1. Many people mentioned spot metering, but I don't know about metering, so I think it is enough to evaluate metering.

2. I am a loser and have never used a good camera, so I don't feel the plastic feeling and poor skin complained by Gao, Fu and handsome people.

3. Screen, as above. It should be because I haven't used a good camera, and I don't think the screen is poor.

4. For 720P camera, please note that it is 30P and d3100 is 24P. The difference in smoothness is obvious. Personally, I think 720P is just good, and it is clear enough on the computer. The computer screen resolution is usually 1366 * 768, which can only produce 720P effect. Therefore, using 1080P camera will increase the pressure of hard disk.

5. As for focusing in video, it's really hard to use. It's much worse than focusing in photography. But it can be solved by manual focusing. Manual focusing in the video process is not troublesome, because unlike taking pictures, it does not require high accuracy. As long as the screen looks satisfactory, the actual shooting effect will be basically satisfactory.

6. The battery is really not good. It's estimated that there are only three or four hundred. I'm used to pressing the shutter randomly, especially when I go hiking and change scenes. One battery is a little strained, so I bought a spare battery on Taobao. However, on the whole, this is not a defect. It's a big deal to buy two spare batteries.

7. Compared with the 1000d unit, one of the upgrades is the anti shake effect of the lens, but I personally feel that the anti shake effect of Aishi Little Black Rabbit is not good,. Even till now, I haven't obviously felt the effect of anti shaking

Solemnly declare: I really like Nikon's style and color, as well as its slogan: image, from heart.

I have seen and looked at the lens of Nikon, and I think its lens has a taste. For example, its 50/1.8D is also the head. The head of Nikon is called "human optical essence", but the head of Canon is "small spittoon". It can be understood that this is the self mockery of Canon users and the arrogance of Nikon users, but in depth, it hides the attitude of users to their own basic scenes.

It is undeniable that Canon's high-end lenses and high-end machines are well done, such as 50/1.2L and 85/1.2L, while Nikon does not want to match them with lenses of the same level (50/1.2AIS is not counted, which is obviously out of date). Small Bamboo Cannon reluctantly carries the IS rabbit...

However, Nikon's low-end goodness is not boasted, and there is more to it. For example, Nikon's 35/1.8G is specially made for APS, which is equivalent to the focal section of the full range header. Wumart is not expensive. Canon is only 35/2, which is not only an old thing, but also not cheap (from ZOL forum).

But Canon does do business. I abandoned Nikon in order to get a price difference of several hundred yuan with the d3100. I am really sad because I have always focused on Nikon... Although they are all Japanese, there are only Japanese cameras now, and domestic ones can compete~~

To get to the point, for 1100D, I feel that the airframe is well made and the airframe parameters are solid. Canon has decentralized the "advanced" technology a few years ago

Very good camera, cheap, convenient for low-income people who want to buy SLR camera

unexpected...

I am very satisfied and like Canon 1100D, and I also support Canon. The color of the shot is also good..
People who are not many meters are most suitable.

The price is not much more than some telephoto consumer cameras, and there are many lenses to support it. The picture quality is also good. If you can't play the SLR, you'd better buy it first to practice. Relatively speaking, the performance price ratio is high. It's suitable for women, and it's fashionable to hold it in your hand.

Video capture only supports 720, which is a little unsatisfactory

The appearance is fashionable and the price is reasonable. It is more acceptable to ordinary consumers. It is still good.

High cost performance, high sensitivity, good picture quality, low price, various colors to choose from

Generally, the screen has a heavy plastic feel and no texture

This cost performance ratio is worth buying

1. The price is cheap
2. The size is OK, not very big, very convenient to carry
3. Strong endurance

1. The screen smiled a little

I haven't seen the plastic. I feel very strong

Because I am a beginner, this camera is very suitable for beginners, so I feel good

In general, Canon's current mainstream configurations are all installed on 1100D, adding a button for both real-time view and video shooting. More convenient operation. There are many colors to choose from~I like bright red

2.7 inch, 230000 pixel LCD display is somewhat unorthodox. Many card cameras now have 920000 pixel accuracy

Entry model, suitable for people who are not likely to make

1. The high sense is good. It is completely different from the more high-end half frame machine. The ISO3200 is available, and the 6400 can be used in emergency.
2. Good portability.
312 megapixels is really enough.

1. The focusing system has low performance.
2. There is no spot metering. 2-4% spot metering and 10% local metering are far from each other.
3. There is no reflector pre lift.

Canon players, if they are a little comfortable, still choose a double-digit model.

The fashionable and colorful fuselage is very eye-catching, and the high ISO image quality is also quite outstanding. The price of 3000 yuan for civilians is also most acceptable

The 860 mA battery is not enough, and the display effect of the screen is average

The appearance and price are very attractive. I hope the battery's endurance is stronger

The image of the SLR produced by Canon is relatively good. The operation is simple and easy to understand. After all, the positioning is entry-level and the price is cheap. It is a good choice for people with a small budget.

Pixels are no longer mainstream, but to be honest, 12 million is enough for ordinary fans. The screen is really poor. Everything else was OK, I can afford this price.

Nice machine

The 4200 phone is red because it is a gift for my girlfriend. There is a novice introduction mode, which is quite practical. I have never used it myself. I will listen to my girlfriend's opinion in a few days. It is said that the new haircut is good

Frequency shooting, only 720 is supported, which is a little unsatisfactory

The color is beautiful, light, practical, or suitable for girls