The advantage is that the new flagship of Nikon's screenshots does not need to say much about the fuselage control parameters, just like the d2 and d300 in those days when they were just launched.
Most dissatisfied
It appears a little late, probably because it does not affect the sales of the d7100 d7200 midrange computers.It may be quite expensive.
summary
I have been using the Fuji s5 and Nikon d300 for a long time, and recently I want to buy a new camera. I feel that I am dazzled by Nikon cameras, but I can't start.Upgrading from the d300 to the d810 should be the most appropriate. The body feel and control are the closest, but the price is expensive, and the lens and frame are not suitable.The D7200 is cheap. The original lens can also be used, but I always feel that the body is not very professional, and the control is not convenient. It is not like a working machine.It seems that the D500 is the best choice but not too expensive.
Continuous focus is fast, unambiguous and does not hesitate. It is better than many cameras not to bias color under high sense!High sense 6400 people think that as long as it is not magnified, it is available!
Most dissatisfied
The workmanship of this camera is excellent. I haven't found any shortcomings for the time being. I insist that the cost performance is too low!
summary
If you like snapping, children, activities, sports, birds and news, that's appropriate!You will know what is handy when you use it, and that feeling is too straightforward to describe!
The focus is upgraded to 153, and the focus performance is strong!Although the latest sensor has only 20 million pixels, it is the best configuration. Refer to 7D2.Add wifi, flip screen and other functions.Ios went to the terrible level of 1 million.Support 4K recording.Ten shots per second is really cool.Tolerance has been upgraded again.The white balance is more realistic. Due to the factors of updating the sensor and processor, this time there is no Nikon's unique yellow color, which reduces the pressure on the later stage.
Most dissatisfied
In fact, personally, I don't like the flip screen because it reduces the robustness of the machine.Due to the wireless function, the front panel is made of carbon fiber synthetic plastic, not an integrated aluminum magnesium alloy.Straight out smearing is more powerful.There is no need for professional flash.
summary
All the above are official statements. Here are the true comments. I used Canon 7D mark II and Nikon D750, and borrowed them for research and comparison after my friend bought the D500. The results were quite shocking!The D500 is close to 6D and 5D3 in terms of high sensitivity, which is a fact. Through the comparison of several groups of samples and nearly hundreds of high sensitivity pictures, I deeply lament that half of the original picture has so much potential to tap.The 7D2 has been rolled in the 6400, which means raw. The 7D2 can be used in the 3200, but it is barely used in the 6400, while the D500 can barely be used in the 12800.As for straight out, I also admire the smearing. I can hardly see any noise on the 6400, and the picture is still very clean. It is conceivable that its algorithm and technology have really made a qualitative leap.As a professional fuselage, the continuous shooting, focusing, picture quality and high feeling are almost impeccable, but the flip screen and the non metal fuselage are really a little pity. The flip screen is still personal, and some think it is convenient for creation, but the fuselage is not as solid and reliable as the 7D2. Although it is not good to use at ordinary times, it is still a professional SLR. For the combat environment,Not very reassuring.In general, this upgrade is a huge upgrade to meet the needs of almost sports, news, racing, performances, animals, planes, horse racing, bird fighting, humanities, scenery and other photographic subjects. If not very professional or required by partners, users need to buy 5D,The D500 has to surpass the D810 in some aspects, which is an indisputable fact. Although the resolution and lens group suffered, it is better than the D810 in covering a very wide range.You will know when you use it. People who understand it will understand it, just like I chose 7D2.Before the D500 came out, the half frame was 7D2. Now the D500 is an absolute half frame, which is well deserved!
The continuous shooting speed is fast, the 153 point focus is almost full screen, and the ISO high sense is very good.
Most dissatisfied
It is on trial. Please review it later.
summary
Overall, I felt it was pretty good.There is a full frame machine D800, and the D500 has fast continuous shooting speed, good sense of height, and more focus. Compared with the original lens, it has increased the focus section, and has advantages in shooting animals, sports, stage, and rhythmic gymnastics.D800 hangs wide angle and medium focus section, and D500 hangs long focus.Personal opinions are for reference only.
To be honest, if you don't have excessive requirements for the picture frame, the D500 is a copy of the D5, and there are more powerful 4k, life, Bluetooth, touch screen, flip screen...
1 Excellent workmanship, comfortable to hold, and convenient to flip the touch screen for shooting and browsing.2. The focus is accurate, the focus is fast, and the continuous shooting is powerful.3 High sense and strong, far more than the general full width.4. High tolerance, large space for later operation.5 The key layout of the machine body is reasonable, and the operation is convenient and fast.6. Pure color, accurate white balance, excellent picture quality, high clarity and accurate metering.
Most dissatisfied
It is not convenient to cancel the flash of the fuselage, sometimes the small backlight is not convenient.
summary
Nikon's real DX flagship, powerful focusing and focusing, XQD card application writing speed and reading speed are very fast, continuous shooting is fast, solid body structure, reasonable key layout, convenient and fast operation.Strong high sense, pleasant continuous shooting, excellent picture quality, pure color, multiple and accurate metering modes, and great flagship quality.
It is rumored that the D400 will be released, but I think there must be no D400.This model is likely to fall on the D500. It is likely that Nikon will produce a full frame fuselage without motor, and this model will definitely be the D5XX series.
Most dissatisfied
What has Canon 7D2 ever failed to release?There must be a reason, because Nikon changed tactics..
The key design of the fuselage has good controllability. The small D5 is also similar to the D300S. There is no fool mode turntable. 20 million pixels is enough. 10 consecutive shots are fast and the JPEG cache can be used to take more than 100 consecutive shots. The high ISO image quality is particularly good. The image quality of ISO2000 is better than that of 7100 800. The focus is fast and accurate. With 17-55, the full picture is not required
Most dissatisfied
Not full width, CF card slot has been canceled, SD speed is too slow, XQD card is relatively small and expensive, and the battery is not durable
The performance of similar models is relatively good
Most dissatisfied
The price is falsely high and the cost performance ratio is extremely low
summary
The price is higher than that of the whole picture, and the picture quality is worse than that of the whole picture. Except for a small number of new comers, there will not be many buyers.
The continuous shooting speed is really cool, the price is affordable, the picture quality is excellent, the performance is excellent, and the body is solid
Most dissatisfied
In the first five days, the shutter has passed 500 times, and no shortcomings have been found so far
Focusing is stable and accurate, focusing at night is also good, the screen display effect is very good, the flip screen is very practical, and continuous shooting is very powerful.
Most dissatisfied
Wireless transmission is rubbish in rubbish. The speed is extremely slow. WIFI connection cannot be established independently. It can only be connected on the basis of Bluetooth connection. The battery life is very poor, about 500 pieces. Maybe it is because of the screen upgrade
summary
The performance is outstanding and impeccable. In addition to wireless transmission and battery life, there are no obvious shortcomings.
Alas, today's d300s wipe the fuselage. I have never wiped the reflectors and sub reflectors before, and I also focus on them with frosting.Wipe the LCD with water. It's terrible. The secondary reflector is very flowery and turns green. It took a lot of effort to fix it with medical cotton. There are filaments everywhere. Finally, when I got on the computer, it was heartbreak. There were several scratches in the middle left and lower left corner of the eyepiece. Finally, it was confirmed that the focus screen was flowery.I want to die.I also used medical cotton to wipe the CMOS for several times. Fortunately, there was no problem.It is also seen that the lower part of the CMOS has bright lenses. According to the data, it is used for focusing and monitoring, and the surrounding is full of filaments.Anyway, I dare not fool around any more.In the future, the camera will not be moved. Last year, the P5100 digital card a few years ago was directly dismantled and scrapped.Never dare to disassemble the camera again.Grandma's.Today's 300s doesn't affect the use, but it seems uncomfortable.
Half of the flagship Nikon D500! Advantages: It fully inherits Nikon D300S, with large body, good grip and professional handling; Disadvantages: Why does the front of the fuselage still use carbon fiber composite material instead of magnesium aluminum alloy? Is it good for WIFI signal? Conclusion: We will wait and see for this model, and hope that there will be no various defects after it comes into the market!
The d500 is appetizing!Can't come out after a thousand calls!I think: the higher you win, the greater you hope, the harder you fall, and the greater you lose!The Japanese will never sell the machines with good quality, cheap price and advanced functions to the Chinese!What kind of picture is good in the whole picture, but bad in the half? Ordinary people can't let it go as big as ten feet. The picture quality is the same!
With clear positioning, distinctive features and powerful functions, 17-55 can completely complement the features/performance/functions of all full width SLRs in the gun factory.
Isn't the full picture used for large-scale advertising?Is it necessary to use the full picture when playing alone at home?.A friend said to me;"It is not for profit that SLR is useless".Is that true
