Comments on Nikon D90 (single machine)

1. Many function keys are on the machine, which is convenient and practical.
2. The menu level is clear, and you can quickly adapt to it even if you haven't used Nikon
3. For non professional users, the imaging quality is satisfactory.
4, 18-105, which is quite good in terms of cost performance.
5. The reliability of D90 for general shooting and creation is very reassuring

6. ISO is a data. How many people will use ISO1600 to produce films? ISO 800 is sufficient
7. High pixels are also data. How many people enlarge the 30 inch image? Pixel 1200W is enough
8. How many people use high-speed continuous shooting? Are you a sports reporter? Is the probability high? It's still data. 4/S is sufficient
9. Most of the cameras are obsolete. Maybe many of the functions in the camera have not been used. I don't know what they are for

The above 6, 7 and 8 are the things that businesses fool consumers. Don't be fooled by these data when buying cameras

1. Non metal body.
2. The lens interface of the machine is plastic.
There is a little less focus at 3 and 11 o'clock, but it is enough in most cases.
4. The camera is optional. It doesn't matter if you put it on the SLR as a gadget.
5. ISO starts from 100, and expands to 50-80.
6. It is absolutely affordable.

1. The price performance ratio is still very high, at least more than the three digit computers of C, including the 550D, which is not as good as the D90. I have used both C and N, which is very objective. The 500D has no use in the last red circle. I can't see the difference between it and the sleeve head, but the difference is that the D90 has a gold circle head, so you can see the difference between it and the sleeve head. The 3-digit computer of Family C is not as good as the entry-level computer of Family N.
The SLR is a simple way to distinguish between two models with the same price and function. You can't decide who to choose! It depends on the weight

Home N is a camera maker, and home C is an advertiser.

2. The D90 for entry-level and non professional users can absolutely meet the needs. In most cases, its availability is 90%, as reliable as its name.

3. Read the manual more, surf the Internet more, shoot more, think more, and you can know why the SLR film is a little gray, which is reasonable. It can be solved in the camera settings, avoiding late adjustment for lazy people.

In terms of cost performance, D90 is reliable, reliable and worth buying and using.

I have used 450D+18-55IS+501.8 before. 50D+A16+501.8+17-40L。 On the whole, a lot of energy and financial resources have been spent. In the second half of the year, we went out in one breath, and now we have Nikon D90 (purchased by JD) to talk about our feelings:
1. The D90 has a good feel, which is worse than the 50D, but it is much better than all Canon entry-level machines (no matter high or new). It's firm to hold.
2. I feel that Nikon is very kind. Each machine has a screen cover. Small pieces are very powerful and impressive. The lens is basically equipped with a hood, which is also good.
3. Nikon's equipment is generous, and a lens bag is attached to the machine, which is really generous. Surprise.
4. The photography is good, and the aperture is well matched. The film is quite sharp! It is often said that Nikon takes pictures of landscapes and Canon takes portraits. However, the portraits taken by Nichias are also good. The details should be determined by the lens strength, and cannot be generalized.
5. I am not an equipment party, but I like taking pictures very much. Although the D90 camera is chicken ribs, it is quite useful at critical times. Although it can't focus automatically, it is also very interesting to use it manually. It has a clear sense of propulsion. (The feeling of blockbuster is exaggerated, ha ha) This is actually meaningless.
6. The various settings in the style are very complete, which can be operated on the PS machine, but rarely used, but practical.

Disadvantages: 1. The SD card used is not very professional (just feeling). I like the CF card, but the card is expensive. 2. In setting, sometimes it is necessary to return to the menu to operate the focusing mode (focusing). A few functions on the shoulder screen cannot be directly operated, which may be affected by the 50D large turntable. But I feel that there are some minor deficiencies. 3. The focusing system feels different from Canon's style. I may have been used to focusing at home C, but I am still exploring and learning slowly.

PS: Equipment is a hobby of each family. It doesn't mean to criticize others, but only for their own feelings.

The advantages and parameters are clear.

I used it for more than half a year, but I didn't find any shortcomings. Besides, I'm not a good technology. As for some people who say that video is not good enough, it doesn't affect me because I only take photos, not DV.

I feel that the appearance and texture are good, and I also feel good when holding it. When I first went to buy it, I compared it with Canon's several entry-level models. The first feeling I got was that it was not as good as the D90. For example, the size of CMOS is slightly larger than that of cameras of the same specification, which I think is very good.
Pentagon and other hardware devices are really practical and easy to use. Maybe you haven't bought them yet or just started to use them. You just don't care about pixels or high-definition. For a camera, it's not a camera. For other 1080P high-definition videos, It's not the work of cameras at all. It's just a feeling of being idle. In addition, taking videos is the work of CMOS, which hurts the hardware. But some businesses don't care as long as they can "impress" beginners with a variety of functions. Can you keep the engine rotating at maximum speed when you drive a car?
For CMOS of this size, no matter which brand of SLR, it is enough to achieve more than 10 million pixels. It is meaningless to increase the number of pixels. It is only necessary to upgrade the high sensitivity, exposure, focus and so on! For those wandering in a variety of friends reference.

A. The extremely convenient control mode, Nikon's consistent integrated design of power supply and shutter button, is much more convenient than Canon. There are also N multi shortcut key double dial wheel design
B. Good handle and moderate weight
C. Excellent imaging quality and high sense and noise control ability
D. Eye flat five edge eyepiece, clearly restore the real world.
E. With the shoulder screen representing the logo of the mid end camera, it is very convenient to adjust parameters and preset values. The LCD screen does not need to be turned on frequently, saving a lot of power for the camera
F. Excellent battery life. It can take 1000 photos after fully charged. Of course, the shoulder screen is very important.
G. Rich optimized calibration settings and functional settings, which can import custom curves, etc., with a high degree of personalization.
H. With its own body motor, it provides good support for the use of cost-effective D-head (such as 50/1.8D)
1. The 11 point auto focus with reasonable layout is very convenient for shooting
J. It has a fully functional photometric system (global central key point measurement linkage) and good white balance judgment
K. The continuous shooting speed is 4.5 pieces/second, which is enough. 100000 times release shutter life
50. A SLR camera that can shoot high-definition video.

A. The pixels are too low. 1230W pixels are generally enough, but compared with the current machines on the market, I think it is appropriate to have a 1800W pixel. But when I think that Nikon's high-end D300S and full D700 are also 1230E pixels, I am relieved to think of this, ha ha.
B. There are too few crosshairs in focus (only one point in the middle). Although it does not affect the use of the crosshairs, it would be great if it was an 11 point crosshairs, and the focus accuracy and speed would be improved.
C. The video shooting can't focus automatically, but the shooting effect is good. I used it to shoot the wedding, very clear, better than DV.
In fact, I am more concerned about the pixel problem (after all, higher pixels can provide more space in the later stage), and I think other machines can be said to be perfect APS-C machines.

D90 is a classic terminal SLR machine, which has a good reputation. I have used it for more than a year and I feel very good. It's really cool to use a 50/1.8D header to take portraits. It's cheap to experience the illusion effect of large aperture. The body motor of the D90 also works well with this lens. If the D90 is out of production, you must hurry up to buy it. Of course, if you can afford it, it is recommended to use a D7000 or higher machine. But at this price, the D90 is the best choice. This machine can be a sharp tool for you to record your life or create, whether you are professional or amateur. I recommend it again. D90， A choice without regret.
Lens: 18-105 has excellent imaging, but the aperture is too small. However, the addition of ED lens still makes the imaging quality of this lens very good. The 18mm distortion is a bit severe, which needs to be corrected later. The 105mm end is easy to produce concealed corners, which should be noted. This lens is enough for hanging up the phone. I think that the performance of people and scenes is good. I am not an equipment party and cannot afford to burn.

1. The pixel is barely. There is no 1800W, but there is no big difference. After 800W, I think there is no big difference
2. It feels good. It's heavy in the hand, but it's tiring to carry
3. The battery is durable. I haven't tried how many photos can be taken, but there are at least 3 grids left when I go out with full charge
4. Double paddles are very comfortable
5. Shoulder screen. I have to admit that it is very useful and practical, especially when the power is turned off, it can also display the number of pictures that can be taken.

1. The focus is slow, which may be the reason of the insert. After 50D, it can be completed after a few words. Sometimes it takes a long time for the 90 belt insert to be used. 2 Although it's very impressive, it's always heavy. With the sliphead, it's more than 1kg. With other accessories, it's very heavy. It's recommended that you take them for travel and photography anyway

I bought it in June 2010. At that time, there were 7260 bags plus UV cards. In fact, there was no difference in price. The key was to buy good things. In February 2011, I bought 50mm 1.8D...

In general, it's a very good machine, and its practicality depends on the individual. There's no need to evaluate the number of pixels, the quality of imaging, and the price of SLR. The key is to use the equipment at hand. Some people can take beautiful pictures with the D60, and some people can't take anything if you add a bunch of red circle lenses to their invincible rabbit, So I think it is more practical to spend more time studying photography skills and so on. You will never be satisfied with the equipment

Take good photos, talent is the key factor

Since I bought the camera, there has been no problem with it, which indicates that the quality is OK. What I am satisfied with is that the personalized settings can be achieved according to my own requirements. Thank you very much, the price is acceptable.

The focus is not very accurate, and the red shooting is not ideal. If the setting is not good, overflow will occur. Conclusion: It is a good camera

It has been more than three years since it was launched in 2008, and the digital products have been updated quickly. This machine has been held fast for three years, which shows its strength and position in the eyes of photography lovers. It can be said that among the Nikon family SLR cameras held by photography lovers, the D90 should be one of the most popular models. Now the D7000 is on the market, which can be said to be an upgraded version. But for photography lovers, only the image processors and the number of focal points are useful upgrades. As for other shooting special effect modes, there is no real meaning. The shutter speed is increased to 8000. Compared with photography enthusiasts, few can use such a shutter. This upgrade has added nearly 3000 oceans! In terms of the quality of the photos taken, the D7000 has no qualitative improvement compared with the D90. For photography enthusiasts, 12 million pixels is enough. After all, it is not commercial photography. You must put photos at a huge size. If you can zoom in 40 inches, it will be enough? Of course, if you are a professional photographer, this machine is not ideal, but for most photography enthusiasts, it is still the preferred model for entry-level SLRs. Unfortunately, it is estimated that this machine will be delisted soon.

The D90's cost performance ratio is very high. Although the D7000 is replacing the D90 market, the D90 still has an advantage in cost performance. Although the D7000's pixels are higher than the D90's, the imaging effect is not related to the pixels, and the D90's sensor is a little larger than the D7000, so the imaging effect will not have much difference. It is possible that the D90 will also have some advantages in price. The D90's advantage is larger than the D7000's light It will cost more than 6000 for a single machine, but it only needs more than 5000 for the D90 to buy the machine+Doghead. Although it is said that the D7000 video is 1080P high-definition video and the D90 is only 720P, but buying an SLR is not for video recording. No one said that buying an SLR is not for video recording

The pixel and video are a little poor, but the imaging effect is very good. It is enough for beginners and family users, and it is basically enough if they are not professional after buying

Very cost-effective machine. If you haven't played SLR or household machine before, you will basically buy the D90. In two or three years, she will become the best partner to accompany you. The cost-effective half screen machine is the first choice. It is economical and practical

Everyone has said the advantages. After using this machine for more than a year, I feel that it is really great. I like it because of its workmanship. It is domineering and handsome. Moreover, the control is much more personalized than that of the C family, and the feel is not comparable to that of the C family. As for the function, I don't think it is necessary to say whether to buy new or old digital equipment. For photography, it is good enough, There are always classics that new products cannot match. In short, you will never regret buying them!

The pixel is a little low, but it is enough for me to use, and there is too little focus, but this price does not demand anything, just enough. I won't mention the video function. After all, it is rarely used, which has little impact on me. The camera needs to do its job of taking pictures.

A magic machine that has lasted for four years is absolutely superior to other machines. It is the best choice at the same price. I will never regret buying it.

Improved and more at 80! Apart from others, dust removal is the biggest improvement.

Adding the camera function is a great progress, but it is also a major disadvantage. The recording hole is easy to get dust. The function of dedusting has created the function of dedusting. In fact, professional photography rarely uses cameras to take pictures, which has no real effect.

If Japan spent the time to increase the camera function of the D90 on the essence of the body (such as adding anti shake, three kinds of dust removal), it would be acceptable for the public not to take the camera. It is estimated that N will double the market share of N with the 90 machine, but it is estimated that this is our delusion, the Japanese are cunning! N C S three are all discussed! It will not be upgraded in place at one time. It is not necessary to empty consumers' pockets by upgrading! In fact, if the D80 does not stop production and has another function (dedusting), it is estimated that it will sell well, because the price of the D80 has been accepted by the majority of consumers, but this idea is unrealistic. Just like the Japanese saying of fake Da (Li Poqing): your - money - mine - my - pocket for you!

The fuselage feels thick. Although it is not a metal fuselage, it feels comfortable in the hand; Diagonal angle is fast and accurate; The shoulder screen is really practical, and it reflects a lot of information; The quality of the socket is much better than Canon, and the imaging quality is also very good, which is enough for a novice like me; With body motor, this is very important in Nikon's machines; The sound of the shutter is crisp, and the more you listen, the more you want to shoot

It's really a chicken bone to shoot a video. The price of 720P is too high to be low
1200W pixels are less than many entry-level machines today

I did consider the 550D (18-135) and D3100 (18-105) when I bought the machine, but I think the D90 is more in line with my requirements. One is the body. The 550D and D3100 feel like toys, and the second is to see the online samples of the D90. The high feeling of the machine taken two years ago is almost the same as that of the current one, Besides, the D90 has great advantages over other machines in terms of motor and lens configuration in the future
In short, D90 is really a myth, a machine that you can own

The color is real and the image quality is good. With shoulder screen, easy to operate. The battery is durable. High cost performance.

The plastic fuselage makes the fuselage light, and the feeling of head weight and foot weight is particularly obvious when wearing the medium and long focus lens, for fear that the lens will break the fuselage. The minimum sensitivity setting of 200 is high, although it can be lowered, the effect is not ideal. The shooting effect of the short film is not good, but it does not affect. The camera is positioned instead of the camera. It would be better if the number of pixels could be increased to 18 million.

It has been more than three years since it was launched in 2008, and the digital products have been updated quickly. This machine has been held fast for three years, which shows its strength and position in the eyes of photography lovers. It can be said that among the Nikon family SLR cameras held by photography lovers, the D90 should be one of the most popular models. Now the D7000 is on the market, which can be said to be an upgraded version. But for photography lovers, only the image processors and the number of focal points are useful upgrades. As for other shooting special effect modes, there is no real meaning. The shutter speed is increased to 8000. Compared with photography enthusiasts, few can use such a shutter. This upgrade has added nearly 3000 oceans! In terms of the quality of the photos taken, the D7000 has no qualitative improvement compared with the D90. For photography enthusiasts, 12 million pixels is enough. After all, it is not commercial photography. You must put photos at a huge size. If you can zoom in 40 inches, it will be enough? Of course, if you are a professional photographer, this machine is not ideal, but for most photography enthusiasts, it is still the preferred model for entry-level SLRs. Unfortunately, it is estimated that this machine will be delisted soon.

It's better than I expected~I have been looking at various SLR performance indicators and parameters before, one by one, price comparison. Many said bad (that the color is cool, the pixel is not high, the shutter is not fast...), and many said good, which made me a headache for novices like me~Many people around me advised me to buy Canon, and said Canon's sales are good, and the machine must be very good..... After more than a month of comparison, I decided to buy the D90, because I like its sharpness, delicate image, good focusing speed, and really good color. You can adjust it as you like. The functional keys are arranged in order and easy to use. The model is compact and its size is just suitable for my rough hand. It has a strong sense of noise control (I like taking pictures at night), The shutter sound is not very loud and the speed is not weak.

Like everyone else, it is the problem that the camera cannot focus automatically (it is not a disadvantage, just do the essential work of the camera well)

After entering the machine, I felt that I had bought the right one, as if I had finally found a friend. I entered the machine on May 28 and stroked it every day, not because I had never touched the SLR camera before, but because I felt that the camera was too valuable (I took several portraits of my friends, and they all said that how the machine came out was like makeup, and the skin lines were so clear) --You will see my PP soon, because there are too many experts here, you can't lose face too much, can you? Just touch it for a few more days. I believe the performance of the machine at this price is really good~it's absolutely right to buy it!!!!

It's easy to operate. The front and rear wheels have simple menus. The shoulder screen is practical and looks good. The endurance is good. I took more than 1100 shots twice for three consecutive days, but I didn't charge them. Good imaging and sharpness. The key is that the price is already very low, and the cost performance is self-evident.

Electronic products are updated very quickly. This machine has been on the market for some days, but parameters such as elephant number are still slightly behind. It is difficult to focus in dark environment, and the automatic white balance will be inaccurate.

If you don't pursue the so-called gorgeous parameters and are just an ordinary enthusiast, this machine is really worth having now. High cost performance.

All kinds of parameter setting shortcut keys are in place. The double wheel, shoulder screen, and parameter adjustment settings are extremely fast. My 185cm palm is too big and my grip is still comfortable and firm. The viewfinder is also relatively satisfied. Strong endurance, very good imaging with socket sharpness. Body motor, high sense effect, good screen display.

If compared with the SLR at the same price and level, the disadvantages can be ignored.

I have used the D5100 to rotate the screen and take pictures in a circle before. It is my favorite feature that the pixels are hundreds higher than the D90, but there are three very unbearable points. 1. When holding the machine, the little finger must be hanging in the air and the handle will be much better, but the D5100 handle looks really ugly... 2. Except that the shutter and aperture can be set quickly by using the dial wheel, other parameters seem to need to enter the MENU menu... 3. No shoulder screen, high power consumption, low battery capacity, plus one handle and two batteries, I don't know if I can take 900 pictures... After decisively starting D90, I really don't regret it! The screen does not rotate and the video 720 is strong enough to use the pixels 1230. It doesn't matter if you don't want to put the big photos!

Good color, good detail, high sharpness and no distortion.
The operation is simple and the grip is excellent. Maybe I like Nikon too much.
The body has a motor, which can be equipped with an old lens - saving money.
The price is super low, and the current set is only 5500. For models that are about to stop production,
This price may not be low, but for the mid-range SLR that has shrunk twice after two years of running in, friends who want to buy it should not miss it.
There is a shoulder screen. It is said that the warranty time given by the manufacturer is long (which means that the manufacturer is not afraid of damage) - high durability!

HD photography is not good, but where can I use SLR photography if I like photography? Besides, card machines or mobile phones can now take high-definition videos, so this function can almost be omitted. The continuous shooting speed is really not enough. It's really out of date for the mid end SLR. But look at the D7000, which is the shadow of the D90 - too expensive.

It's definitely worth buying, and I will never regret it. It's too late to regret if I stop production for a while. It also reminds new friends that pixels are not the key to the quality of SLR. D90's comprehensive strength is really strong. Don't hesitate

The first SLR. Comfortable feel and excellent imaging. In short, there are too many advantages. Before I bought it, I struggled for a long time between D90 and Canon 50D, but after checking a lot of data and samples on the Internet, I finally decided to start D90, because I like to take landscape photos, and D90's clear, sharp and colorful style just suits me. It has been used for almost two months. I really don't regret it at all!

Although the imaging of the sleeve head is OK, it is still far from what I want, mainly because the color is not rich enough and the picture is not exquisite enough. Recently, I entered 16-85, and finally achieved everything I wanted. The oily color and exquisite texture give full play to the advantages of D90! It is recommended that those who are ready to purchase D90 and have conditions to purchase a single machine directly, and then match it with 16-85.

A good machine that won't regret when you buy it.

After more than a month, I have learned something, and casually say:
1. The price is really unspoken, only more than half of it was just launched, and there is no generational difference compared with the new models; 2. Powerful function, high photo sharpness, good picture quality, accurate color, simple art photography is enough to produce a masterpiece; 3. The machine body is of excellent workmanship and moderate weight, which can be matched with most of Nikon's lenses, and has the potential to match better lenses; 4. It has rich operation functions and detailed instructions, so it is not difficult to get started with basic words.

1. The video function is optional and basically unnecessary; 2. Pixels are slightly lower.

I am a user who upgraded from Nikon D70 and am very satisfied with D90. This model is really quite classic and well used. Its overall shooting effect is of the same grade as the D300, and it must exceed the D200.

After the test of time, electronic things can not be caught up. Machines many years ago are actually enough. D90 is definitely not enough for professional people, nor for the Equipment Party. It is enough for ordinary photographers, especially students, family and tourism photographers. Why do you want such a large resolution? Computer screens 19~24 are the most common, and tens of millions of pixels are enough! 5 megapixel photos are also very large, so it is enough to send some albums. In fact, it depends on the positioning. There is no need to pursue these things. Many people buy them and leave them at home for a long time without using them. No matter how good they buy, it is also a waste. For beginners, it is perfect to buy a D90 and a D90 digital SLR photography skill book. After two to three years of understanding and skills in photography, I will buy more high-end products. Now, the price is less than 6000, and the price of Taobao smuggled goods is less than 5000.

The first SLR to be tortured!

Very good-looking appearance, good texture and feel! See some wedding photography are using D90.

1. The price is low and easy to get.
2. Double wheel control, convenient and fast.
3. Good picture quality
4. The shutter sound is crisp
5. Light weight
6. Good grip
7. High display pixels
8 Suitable for beginners to intermediate photography players
9. Relatively power saving

1. All plastic body without hand feeling
2. The body motor is ordinary, and occasionally hesitates when the D-type lens is driven
3. The pixel is slightly lower

Nikon D90 is indeed a legend and classic. Because of its control, appearance and price, it is very cost-effective! Nikon D90 has also created a classic sales volume and one of the models with the largest number of users. The configuration of various parameters is very balanced and just right. The number of people who use D90 to take photos is very widely distributed, D90 is a miracle as well as a classic. With the termination of D90 production, the old man will gradually withdraw from the stage of Nikon's history. But I believe that when D90 is mentioned in the future, most players will remember, and even accurately say its release date, production termination date and various parameters. Play photography, starting from Nikon D90!

1. Beautiful appearance, masculine atmosphere (personal view). Although it is not a metal body, it is of excellent workmanship, full texture, and just right size. The feel is much better than the entry-level D3000.
2. The price is not much higher than the latest low-end models, but the features are comprehensive, the playability is much stronger, the design is more scientific, the operability is good, and it is easy to use.
3. Excellent imaging, solid pixels and good noise control. Rookies don't comment much on the quality of the picture, but the reputation of the d90 is obvious to all.

After all, the two-and-a-half year machine is a little old, and its parameters are relatively weak. Video function chicken ribs. The price has fallen to this point, which is firm and attractive. Although it is basically acceptable, a large part of consumers may switch to new low-end machines or hold back better ones. The auto focus of details is not particularly accurate.

The d90 is still young, and the aging of its parameters does not affect its excellent performance. As a novice, I didn't buy the more expensive d7000 (because I don't know how long my interest in SLR will last - embarrassing). After playing with my friend's d3000, I also gave up the idea of buying low-end machines. The skinny camel is bigger than the horse, and its feel, design, lens support, etc. are much better. At present, I only bought a 35/1.8g dog set. The big aperture is more playable, but actually 18-105 sets are very good. N's low-end cameras are very generous. The most important thing for playing SLR is to "play". It is true to spend appropriate money to make yourself enjoy photography to the maximum