1. The price is relatively cheap. 2. The imaging was fairly good, relatively sharp, and there was no difference between 15 and 30 ends. 3. The most surprising thing is that in RAW format, if the lens is not corrected, the viewing angle is almost 12mm, but there is an ugly dark angle at 12mm. If it is corrected to about 14mm, the dark angle will disappear.If shooting at night, the dark angle can be ignored, and the viewing angle can reach 12mm. 4. The lens is very light. 5. Anti shake is OK. I tried it for 1/30 seconds, and the picture is clear and sharp.
Most dissatisfied
1. The aperture is too small. When shooting in dark light, I have to turn up the ISO. I sometimes use 5000 ISO, and later use Lr to remove noise. 2. The color is still the color of a dog's head, without the oily feeling of red circles. Of course, it can definitely afford the price. 3. I changed from RF16mm2.8, and the overall quality is better than 16. I recommend not buying 16. I buy this one. Of course, the red circle is not bad for money. I also have the EF16-35F4L red circle. I bought this one because it is light and cheap. I don't even install the protective lens to prevent the protective lens from affecting the light line refraction. Anyway, I don't feel distressed.
Previously, it was the first RF lens to be purchased, and I was interested in the anti shake function.It can also be delivered the next day during 618, which is amazing
I bought this lens for the convenience of taking short videos. It's OK to unpack it. Unfortunately, there is a little dust in the lens. I can't help it. It's OK to use it normally. The main reason is that it's super cheap to catch this 6.18 event. It's much cheaper than before. It's no different from buying a second-hand one
Canon RF port lens is small and expensive, and can be measured in and out.First, hang up the travel head. After the camera is clear and the wallet has recovered its thickness, put it on the other head...It's not useful yet. First give a good comment on one of the official original lenses. They are well packaged and exquisite, and they didn't win the prize. Ha ha, there is no dust inside.satisfied!
The price performance ratio is high, 15 ultra wide is much more than 16, the imaging ratio is slightly lower than 14-35f4, the hood is not equipped, Canon is too stingy.
This time, Canon didn't have a paper shell to protect the inside of the box. The inside of the box is also this kind of plastic bubble.Is it normal?If they are all the same, there is nothing wrong.There are other structures inside my lens brush box, which are directly wrapped in plastic bubbles.Especially Taobao.I haven't used it yet. Please give me a good comment first. If you have any questions, please ask again
Experience wide-angle at the lowest price. Canon's castration technique is vicious. The aperture of 4.5 is shy of saying, but who makes it cheap? The effect is OK. Don't look carefully. Generally, a small aperture is enough. One third of the price in the red circle should not be confused when experiencing wide-angle.
Three thousand five is ok, buy it and store it.It should be useful after unsealing.Canon's camera is very good.Fairly good value for money.It is recommended to start with.I'm satisfied!!
