Comments on Canon A470

Very good price,
Good imaging quality

Shaking prevention is not good

Generally good, suitable for people without money!

The scenery is good~just like the painting~especially the super macro is very good~

No anti shake~but it's OK~

It's generally good~popular machine~suitable for people with little money~good effect~~besides, there's no cramp in the hands~it's not good without anti shake~~

It's a Canon machine anyway~

Imaging is calculated in the same price machine

The quality inspection is not strict. The camera, lens, CCD and motherboard I just bought are all defective.

Buy Canon (at least on low-end computers) to see if you are lucky.

A professional family brand with good imaging and good chroma. Although the LCD screen pixels are not high, they do not affect the quality of photos downloaded to the computer. The viewfinder screen is large, and practical functions are not lacking. It is hard to achieve a high cost performance ratio below 1000 yuan, and 7 million pixels are enough for home use!

7 million pixels is enough

1. High cost performance
2. Canon is always moved
3. Imaging value

1. Slightly poor appearance
2. LCD screen can be larger

Absolutely the best choice among low-end digital cameras~super value!

1. Use Canon DIGIC III processing engine
2. Very distinctive appearance
3. The price is very advantageous

The screen is poor~115000 pixels
The pixel is a little low

The price is too advantageous. It's very good to buy it for children.

Good imaging quality and clear photos; The price is absolutely worthy of you, and the cost performance ratio is high; The brand is also good.

There is no anti shake function, so beginners need to practice more;
The LCD display is only 115000 pixels. Alas, it's a little low

Overall, it gives me the feeling that it is good, but the low-end is excellent, and it is a small jasper.

Cheap or cheap

There is no optical anti shake, and the night scene is not easy to shoot when there is no tripod

Cheap and good

Very cost-effective imaging

Poor appearance, poor anti shake

Generally OK, low-end preferred

A professional family brand with good imaging and good chroma. Although the LCD screen pixels are not high, they do not affect the quality of photos downloaded to the computer. The viewfinder screen is large, and practical functions are not lacking. It is hard to achieve a high cost performance ratio below 1000 yuan, and 7 million pixels are enough for home use!

The fuselage is a little thick, without anti shake, but it's just time to practice your photography skills!

One of the first choice models for general family photography!

1. High cost performance
2. Super macro is very good
3. Small and fashionable appearance

1. There is no anti shake, but basically there is no anti shake below 1K
2. ISO is too noisy and the night view is not ideal

It's good for those who don't have much gold. It's the first choice for beginners

Small camera has great power! The super macro mode can save the money for the SLR to buy a macro lens (if the requirements are not high, there is a lot of money. Look at the price of this camera)

Canon is inevitably overexposed. The stripes appear again. It has pressed more than 4200 shutters. There is no collision, drop, etc~

It's hard to see a small camera with such a high cost performance ratio~

Convenient operation, excellent performance, high cost performance, enough for home use!

No anti shake! It's hard for beginners to shoot!

Generally speaking, small 4 is the best choice!

Macro is very powerful. Yesterday, a Samsung with 12 million yuan won the upper hand over our friend.

It's not anti shake. It's OK to use it by myself. It's not very good at night

Small price, big machine, big love