Comments on Canon 6D Mark II (24-70mm IS USM)

<Return to the comment list
essence
seven
  • cost performance six
  • Manual control eight
  • Battery performance ten
  • Screen effect six
  • Imaging effect six
  • Product workmanship eight

Flagship in consumer level, entry level in professional level

Most satisfied

I am an amateur. When I have time, I take pictures of some children's portraits. I become addicted and earn some pocket money. I used to use Sony's RX1 before, but the lens E61 broke

The above is the background. Here are the advantages

1. Full pixel dual core LV focusing is very convenient and practical. When taking portraits, I basically focus on LV, which is convenient for composition, and the accuracy of focusing at large aperture (50L, F1.2) is higher than that of phase focusing.
2. The focus experience of 45 full crosses is good. Although it is too concentrated, 80% of the situations are enough, unless it is a very special composition.
3. Flip screen praise, although not particularly used, but when you want to use it, you know a lot of trouble.
4. The menu setting is more reasonable than that of Dafa, and the addition of touch screen makes the operation fast, convenient and fast.

Other fragmentary advantages have little impact on me, so I won't mention them

Most dissatisfied

1. Tolerance is poor (note that it is not dynamic range), of course, it does not have a great impact on portraits. However, there are always times when the metering is not accurate, and the tolerance is greater, and the probability of rescue is higher. In short, this is very undocumented. After all, it's 2017
2. 1/4000 maximum shutter speed. It's really not enough for people like me who wish for the maximum aperture in the whole journey. I can't drive F1.2 outdoors in the daytime.
3. Single card slot. This is fatal for professionals who shoot a lot. If there are two or three wedding materials lost, you don't need to mix up in this field. It has little impact on fans. If you are lucky, it will not be a problem for several years.

Other fragmentary shortcomings have little impact on me, so I won't mention them

summary

Professionals, this machine is good for standby. For ordinary enthusiasts, this machine is enough, all aspects are relatively balanced, and the quality of Japanese origin is also excellent (I dare not buy a shoe factory because of all kinds of dross and shutter problems). It's just a new listing, but the cost performance of BOC 12000 is really not high enough. It's better to start within 11000.

Don't go too far in pursuit of extreme data. You can't use it 90% of the time. Sometimes the performance doesn't support it. We can change the beat method. How to take better photos is the point that everyone should pay attention to, rather than looking at the data for comparison all day long. Now many machines are excellent enough for you to take award-winning works.

36 comments 657 likes Published on: August 24, 2017