Comments on Sony A7 II (24-240mm)

The workmanship and imaging quality are excellent. The shortcut key settings are easy to use and easy to use.

The SD card slot door shakes, and the battery compartment door seems to be poorly sealed. When it is closed, the small blue lock of the battery can be seen. The screw antirust paint has been used for two weeks, and then it falls off. Of course, the flaws do not cover the flaws.

At the beginning, I always thought that Weidan might not be as convenient as the traditional silly big black thick. I bought it for a month, took it to Hokkaido, and dried many films at minus 20 ℃. The A7ii resisted the crazy automatic shutdown of the mobile phone. The automatic correction function of angular distortion of the endoscope is good, and the optical zoom is available, so 24 to 70 heads are enough at once. I am very satisfied with the performance and choice of A7ii.

The 7D of the company and the 5D3 of the colleague have tried. The machine is really good, but the weight is really awkward. Sony's new A7 II has basically improved some of the shortcomings of the previous generation. Although the weight has slightly increased, the five axle anti shake, metal body and metal integrated buckle are all good changes. Small size and good picture quality are the advantages of Sony Micro Sing. To be honest, the camera is less and the game is more thorough. Now this product is a new product, so the price is a little expensive at present, but on the whole, A7 II is still worth buying by non professionals.

Good picture quality, small size, excellent workmanship and convenient operation

The battery's endurance is not ideal,

When I bought this machine, the A7R2 was already out. I carefully compared my needs and chose the A7M2. The performance of A7R2 is more attractive and the price is much higher. I would like to configure more lenses. Previously, I used to use 5D3, and I was very satisfied with all aspects of the performance. Except for the endurance, the A7M2's other performance is not inferior to that of 5D3. In terms of the fuselage, it is not lower than my own needs, and the tolerance is better. Then I abandoned Canon

1、 All metal body design, more reliable workmanship.
2、 The video effect is really good. It is estimated that this is due to its fast focusing and precise focusing ability.
3、 In addition, there are several great small improvements, which are more convenient to use. The first is that the SD card slot is changed to horizontal insertion type, which makes it easier to use. The second is to add support for 50Mbps XAVC video format.

Two deficiencies were found:
1、 The continuous shooting speed is still average, only 5 shots per second
2、 . The battery capacity has not been improved

To sum up, this camera is a very good micro single camera and worth recommending

It is compact and delicate, and the metal body is solid and reliable. The focusing speed may not be as fast as that of a professional sports machine, but it is better than the a65 I used before, and its precision is quite high. There are three kinds of focus: large focus, medium focus and small focus. The number of focus is 25 when it is turned up, and 323 when it is turned down. In addition to the outermost circle, it is almost full screen, which is very good. The interface with the lens is made closer than the previous machine. The key 5-axis anti shake is a breakthrough, which is more effective than the 2-axis model of A port model and has a higher film yield.

The shoulder belt is of the A7 generation. It's small, narrow, ugly and uncomfortable. The front and rear wheels are a bit tight, and the SD card slot cover held by the palm is loose. The shutter sound is funny. The buttons are not comfortable to press. In short, the operating feel is better than that of the previous generation, but it is not as good as that of the A-port machine. Compared with the a77II I use now, the a77II is the sky and the a7II is the ground. Especially when I bought it, I knew that the standard configuration was a line charger rather than a seat charger. I ended up spending 340 yuan to buy a charger, so I had to say it was a bit dull. What's the meaning of Sony secretly changing the battery version of the A7II when everyone thinks that the battery life of the A7 is not enough, but the problem is that it has dropped from 1080mAh in the old version to 1020mAh in the new version? Although the battery life seems to be slightly better than that of the previous generation, Sony can actually increase the battery capacity rather than reduce it.

It's a good portable computer. See the figure below for its size (A7II on the left and A77II on the right). It's suitable for taking photos when traveling. It's much easier than the SLR. The low image quality is very good, while the high image quality is slightly lower than the mainstream SLR at the same price. The price is a little high now, but it is worth getting started. Generally speaking, it is the best of lovers and the supplement of professionals. If Soniken modifies the ARW lossy format to RAW lossless format, it will be more attractive to professionals.

1. The cuckold is basically removed, and Virgo is finally willing to take 72 to the street at night;
2. Five axis is very practical, so there is no need to say more about it;
3. The body touch, grip and operation feel are much better than those of 7;
4. The endurance has been slightly improved. I wonder whether those who say that the endurance is declining are paid by other manufacturers.
5. The video ability is enhanced, which is useless for me to take photos.
6. The bayonet is all metal (in fact, it's only 200 yuan for a7 to change the all metal bayonet)
7. The card slot position is very comfortable and the appearance is more reasonable.
8. Slightly improved high feeling
9. The boot speed is fast (but not as fast as the SLR)

1. Redshift still exists
2. Tolerance slightly decreased
3. The front and rear wheels feel very bad, it feels like walking on the mud
4. The endurance is still a big problem. Although two standby power supplies can solve it, two
5. EVF is not even as smooth as Black Card 3. However, the resolution is good. In addition, the sensor is too sensitive, so you can switch the viewfinder in black;
6. There are few camera groups
7. Although some people think the all metal fuselage is good, it is heavy. I also like the all metal fuselage, but the premise is not to hold it.

As a virgo, if you have been tortured by a7, a72 will definitely make you climax on the first monday you start. This update of Sony is like changing the underwear of a jammed egg into a non jammed egg, but the fabric has not changed much. If you are not a Virgo like me, it is not necessary to pay thousands of yuan more for a five axle anti shake machine. But if you are as sentimental and mean as I am, you will have a new life.

Compared with the first generation, all metal fuselage. Five axis anti shake is added. It alleviates [Green Hat]. The price is not high. It has the same operation convenience as the ordinary half width SLR.

The body weighs nearly 600g. Its volume also reaches 80% of that of other SLRs.

The exterior design inherits the extremely ugly appearance of a generation of full frame SLR imitators without flash. What's a reflex free camera with a triangle head like an SLR? And there is no flash on it, which SB designed it? Anyway, it must not be the same person as the A6300 in the half width series. The A6300 really brings into play the advantages of being light and stylish.

The battery is still dead. Fortunately, the third-party battery is not expensive, so it's OK to keep a few for use.

Chicken ribs. [24 million pixels] [Full frame] [Five axis anti shake] [Metal body]... Beneath a pile of tall configuration values, there are [increasing volume and weight], [ugly appearance design], [sad battery life]... This kind of Sony full picture is slightly confused.

1. Peak focusing+magnifying focusing+anti shake, practical macro photography
2. The shutter sound is improved
3. It feels good

1. The magnifying focus C2 and the metering lock AEL cannot be triggered at the same time, but the metering lock on the handle can be triggered at the same time? Is there any suspicion of hotkey conflict? Only hold with metering lock
2. The battery is not durable enough. Even with a handle, the endurance of one battery is less than 200 at most
3. APP has a lot of fun, but the program response delay is serious
4. USB charging is not available with handle

Anti shake is very practical, the battery is not enough

Five axis anti shake, metal body, improved focusing system (actually 4d focusing, only 5fps for continuous shooting), high cost performance

consume power

The a7ii should be the one recommended in the current micro single full set. Of course, if you have a clear purpose, you can choose another one. But if you want to take a picture of everything or travel, the a7ii is the one. The improvement of the fuselage is comfortable to hold, easy to operate, and I like the appearance.

The sense of holding is obviously improved, the operation convenience of the double wheel is improved, the five axis anti shake thick track, and the peak focusing is convenient.
All these advantages determine that this machine is a blessing for manual old players.

The slot door is too loose, and the wave wheel feels bad.

A7 is known as a universal socket, so A7II is a better universal socket.

Portable, no problem in shooting general subjects

The camera switching is troublesome. The most fatal thing is the boastful shutter sound

65 points, unable to achieve silent shooting, which will be Sony's fatal injury

I can't say the advantages. It was originally portable, but its volume is not small. The lens with good effect is as large as the SLR lens. It has to be made

The single point focus adjustment is not convenient, the high sense is poor, the light is slightly weak, and the camera can't see it, and the reaction speed is slow, which is not suitable for capturing. It often shows that the focus is on, but it is pasted on the computer. The durability of the battery and Fuji is one or two grades lower. Color temperature is not accurate, and there is a lot of color mixing in the later stage. (The unit is Sony A72, and I am Canon 6D and Fuji TX1, so I really feel when I use them)

I just got here today. I want to talk about the advantages, proper volume and weight, first-class feel, professional key position, and good photo taking performance! If you are not a professional user, it is absolutely enough.

Generally speaking, it is very balanced. One disadvantage is that the battery life is too weak. Two batteries are necessary! 2. There is no flash. It's a pity. The 3lcd screen sensor is too sensitive. The screen is often black when shooting on the screen, which is very annoying.

If the budget is sufficient, select it. Tuhao can go to A7RM2. It is also great if the budget is less than a6000!

The picture quality is good, especially the color level and dynamics can almost be the same as that of the Nikon 800 series. The most important thing is the lens matching. If you are top heavy, it will be a bit nondescript.

The picture quality is not as powerful as imagined, and it is passable. There are not many supporting lenses. In a word, they are not good enough

The machine is good, and the picture quality is medium (full frame machine). It is worth buying from friends who like the light, not suitable for professional creation....?

1. You can use half frame format or half frame lens. 2. Light, inexpensive. 3. Five axis anti shake, no anti shake for the lens, no problem about 1/20s at the 200mm end. It is better if the lens is also anti shake. 4. Real time shooting, the normal light down parameter display screen can see what kind of shot is much faster than the SLR, which is also the reason why I gave up the SLR and chose Micro SLR. 5. There are more keys and 4 user-defined keys. 6. Turning the focusing ring is convenient for zooming in and focusing.

Continuous shooting and focusing are common. Real time shooting is different from the SLR in the case of abnormal light. Sony lenses are too few and expensive. The high sense is not as powerful as imagined. There is no touch screen and 4D focusing

There is no one of the best choices in the full frame for non-commercial purposes. You can use a half lens to take real-time shots. Five axis anti shake, light and inexpensive, it can kill all full frame SLRs of the same level. It would be perfect if there were silent shutter, 4D focusing and full screen focusing. Now we are using a small white sharpness that is too poor to even get a clear picture of the frost on the tomato. We are going to use Nikon 70-300 small donkey cannon and Shima 501.4 old style. Rational consumption rejects vanity and intellectual disability.

I just got here today. I want to talk about the advantages, proper volume and weight, first-class feel, professional key position, and good photo taking performance! If you are not a professional user, it is absolutely enough.

Generally speaking, it is very balanced. One disadvantage is that the battery life is too weak. Two batteries are necessary! 2. There is no flash. It's a pity. The 3lcd screen sensor is too sensitive. The screen is often black when shooting on the screen, which is very annoying.

If the budget is sufficient, select it. Tuhao can go to A7RM2. It is also great if the budget is less than a6000!

Five axis anti shake! Easy to operate! Focus accurately! Good picture quality

everything goes well

The most cost-effective micro single full frame camera can be used to hang Canon 5D4 for both commercial and household use

The color is real. The night view is enough. Buying cmos is for the sake of high feeling and convenience. 20 million pixels, just right.

Bad endurance

Overall, it is quite good.

The second generation of full picture is strong enough

No shortcomings

Sony Dafa with excellent quality and low price, and Sony full frame micro bill with high cost performance