Comments on Canon 5Ds R set (70-200mm IS II USM)

Eliminates the low-pass filter effect, which is absolutely a magic weapon for taking pictures of scenery

The price is slightly higher than that of cameras of the same level

High pixel, good picture quality, good image quality, slightly expensive

The pixel is very high. The resolution is also very good

The sensitivity is too low. It's about the same as the starter

The sensitivity of Canon 5D Mark III is ISO 100-25600, while the sensitivity of the new Canon 5Ds is ISO 100-3200. It is equivalent to the sensitivity of the entry machine. Why

1. Compared with 5ds, the picture is more transparent and sharp. 2. Compared with the previous 5D3, the pixel has been greatly improved. 3. Canon has the best low perception image quality (none). 4. Excellent grip. 5. Canon's flagship of mid tier full picture (even if a later version of 5D3 is released)

1. The price dropped too fast. I lost more than 3K in two months. 2. High sensitivity can not be used at all. 3. It consumes more electricity than 5ds. 400 tickets are the limit. 4. The cold color is slightly different. 5. You must choose the red circle ox head. The 24-105 dog heads can hardly be seen.

The best Canon with low image quality (none)! However, it is a product that is somewhat off track, and the price drops too fast, which always makes people feel cheated. I have some regrets after buying it. I advise you to wait for the price to stabilize before making a decision.

High pixel without low-pass mirror (weight reduction).

Reduce picture quality, speed and sensitivity.

The 5DS two models must be the failed 5D series upgraded models. They simply pursue high pixels. Both professional and amateur photographers are weak. Only a few commercial photography have a little effect, but others are negative. The picture size is not enlarged, and the pixels are increased by 1.4 times. The picture quality will not be better. Too large files will have too many negative effects on storage and transmission, Even if you get started, you won't use high pixels to illuminate. The most important thing is the high performance of the camera (high image quality, speed, sensitivity, light measurement, dynamic range, shutter times). These things are most useful to improve. We look forward to the early launch of the 5D4 according to this idea.

Picture quality: comfortable......

Don't take the concert with you!
Please provide more than 4 batteries!

With sufficient light source, the picture quality must be first-class! When the light source is not sufficient, it can also have a good effect with flash! You can search Baidu specifically to see the photos taken by others, and the truth will be revealed! The price is really high! But it can't be hundreds of dollars more expensive than 5d3! After the price is reduced, it is still a machine worth having.

The picture quality is fine because the pixels are high. Transparent? Yes, but compared with 5ds. It's hard to say that the fuselage is good.

Let's not talk about high feelings, everyone said bad. What does Canon bring with its high pixels? In addition to the nine grid stack of pixel size, and the desperate edge sharpening, I printed the photo to A2 size, and found sharp edges, except for microscopic texture. The details in the display are amazing, but it's another thing to type it out. Don't doubt my friend's machine. He specializes in this field. In addition, when shooting against the light, the color feeling is obviously cold, and the color has lost its flavor.

Canon is again in the market segment. If 5ds is an experimental machine, Mo5dsr is a transitional machine. But even if we move towards the era of high image quality, the same kind of Nikon d810 pays more attention to it. At least it guarantees the stability of operating performance and the maximum restoration of color while ensuring the pixel quality. Look at this age of rapid discovery. How many more stupid and rough people can carry it? How many people will carry it again? Olympus, Fuji, Sony and Panasonic are all shifting their focus to the fine, small, bright, thin, anti reflective and micro single. In recent years, Olympus and Fuji are two dark horses. How many cameras have come out that can replace your Canon mid-range and entry-level cameras? Even if Canon has a large lens group, there are still challenges from Shima! And at least half cheaper than you! Do you still think that we Chinese people are low-end when you get these two half hung machines out? Do you know only pixels but not quality? To be honest, there are not as many fans as ordinary people, and there are not as many fans as professional studio photographers. If you say this machine is for studio photography, where is the performance upgrade of 5d4? Friends working in Japan have tried 5d4, which is simply the son of 7d and 5d3, the shutter speed of 7d, the high sense and focusing system of 5d3... If Canon is still such a conscientious market segment and no product to catch up with the pace, then Canon will no longer be moved, but quickly fail! Finally, I advise you not to be obsessed with these two models. There is really no quality to speak of. If you really want to buy them, please don't wait at least half a year. The market is the best place to test the products. I guarantee that the price of these two models will fall by 8000 yuan in half a year, and in this half a year, each manufacturer will launch large picture products to share the market synchronously. At that time, it is also targeted.

The details are amazing (especially in the low sense setting, ISO1600 is available), the metering is accurate, the focus is more realistic, the delay shooting is easy to use, the function setting is convenient, the shutter is soft and quiet, and the color of the body is better than that of the 5D3.

The power consumption is relatively high, the high sense image quality is not as pure as 5D3, and the use conditions (illumination, safety shutter, etc.) are relatively harsh. The price is a little higher, 18000 yuan is reasonable.

In general, we will not regret the start, but will not feel amazing! It is strongly recommended for photographers who plan to equip more than two fuselages. It should be a good choice to use it with the 5D4 released later. The details of landscapes and portraits are perfect. 5D3 is more suitable for the humanities. It is said that 5DS/R will replace the 5D4 fuselage after the 5D4 comes into the market, but I think the current fuselage is already strong. Friends who like scenery photography, don't hesitate to come here!

5060 pixels can be comparable to that of the middle picture, and the price is much cheaper than that of the middle picture. It is a camera pursued by landscape photographers. The reflective plate quick return design is adopted to further avoid mechanical vibration. In particular, a special technology is used to add a filter to achieve the design of eliminating low-pass filter, which not only significantly improves the picture clarity but also avoids the generation of Molar and false colors, A variety of options such as 28 million pixels have been adopted to avoid the bottleneck of memory card capacity. The sensitivity can be expanded to 50-12800, which is enough for landscape photography. High sensitivity has no great significance for landscape photography. The positioning of the design is correct. The 5D3 system is used for operation, which is convenient and simple, In a word, it is a camera that professional photographers and enthusiasts dream of.

1. The price of 23900 is on the high side, and the dealers are hyping the retail price recently, so they are ready to start when the price is stable.
2. The endurance of LP-E6N/LP-E6 battery is average.

5DsR is a camera worthy of landscape photographers.

1. Perfect details, convenient for later revision, is the favorite of the Maoist Party (the blood in the eyes and blood vessels on the model's skin are clearly visible after the portrait is 100% enlarged); 2. The color is too good. A pixel box records only one color, which determines that the higher the pixel, the more blocks of a color are subdivided, and the more natural the color is; 3. It is convenient to cut in the late stage, with high pixels, and the secondary composition has little impact on the image quality (with the image quality as the backing, the early composition is much more flexible); 4. The picture quality is exquisite, which I don't know how to describe. It is a bit like the difference between the photos printed on glossy printing paper and ordinary printing paper. I can basically judge which are taken by 5DSR and which are taken by 5D3 or 5D4 at a glance (you can see the photos attached below); 5. It may be because of the high pixels. For the overexposed or underexposed photos, the feeling of brightening or darkening in the later stage is stronger than that of 5D4 and 5D3; 6. The delayed shutter is very easy to use, especially outdoors. The shutter cable can be omitted

1. The requirements for computer configuration are relatively high. A RAW photo is more than 50 megabytes, but the original USB cable has a fast transmission speed.
2. If the high sensitivity is more than 400, it is basically unacceptable. What needs to be noted here is that although the photos taken under the high sensitivity will have obvious noise on the camera, after LR or PS turns to JPG, the noise will be much less, or even invisible. I don't know whether this is the reason for high pixels;
3. I don't think the battery problem reported by other photographers is obvious. I use more optical viewfinder;
4. Handheld shooting is one level faster than 5D3 5D4 shutter speed, which is not suitable for capturing.

I went out of the 5DSR in two ways. The first time I went out was because I could not accept the high sensitivity and the low success rate of handheld photography. Later, I replaced the 5D4 and longed for the image quality of the SR, so I bought the SR again. The second time I went out was because I replaced the motherboard with water, and I had a shadow in my heart. In short, I felt that I had used a high pixel machine, but I had no sense of a low pixel machine.

High pixel, no low-pass, and abnormal sharpness. The 61 point focusing is more than the 5D3. It has more automatic focusing for face recognition and more motion capture. The functions of 1DX are almost all lowered to the 5DSR. It seems that the linkage is almost detected, but the 5DSR exposure is very accurate. Five consecutive shots per second, the picture quality machine is enough. The maximum 3200 ISO available is one gear lower than the 5D3, and it is flat after zooming. What is worth mentioning is that the new CMOS tolerance has been improved a lot, and it is more resistant to the later stage than the previous models. 13.58EV is a large part stronger than the 5D3. The full black can be pulled back, the noise is few and the color remains unchanged, and Nikon Sony will change color. Real time shooting and focusing have also been improved a lot, which can basically be done in seconds.

It's just too expensive. How about a 6D weight.

Canon's top image quality machine, except for its high sensitivity, is one notch lower than the 5D3, and everything else is perfect. The details of more than 50 million pixels are not boasted. It magnifies the abnormal sharpness of 100%. It is said that the old lens cannot feed the high pixels. The 16-35II 85LII 24-105 35-2 on my hand can guarantee the image quality with the maximum aperture, and the sharpness is very good, far from the sharpness and details that the 5D3 can match, To my surprise, the EF50-1.4 can't be fully opened on the fuselage. Before shrinking F2, the sharpness of hair counting is not ideal. The dispersion is heavy. It needs to shrink 2.8 to be perfect. It can count the hair of a face.

I can't see it.

This is a failed model of 135mm system. High pixels cause the file to be too large, which will inevitably overburden the processor, resulting in slow burst speed and increased power consumption. It is estimated that in order to reduce cost, the magnification of pentaprism is only 0.71, which is not bright enough. What is important is that high pixel image files are meaningful only when the photo is enlarged to a certain size. If it is viewed by a display, even a high-resolution display with a wide color gamut is of little significance.

Pixel is high, the shutter surprises me, it feels great

High perception, low price, continuous shooting

It's really good to take still life, scenery and people. It's really moving to cry when watching photos on a 2K resolution monitor

Canon's old advantages plus the resolution power brought by ultra-high pixels

It is still Canon's old weakness, as well as the high sense difference and slow continuous shooting caused by high pixels

In 12 and 13 years, Nikon and Sony launched 3600W pixel professional photography market respectively. There is an obvious trend of high pixels. But Sony's coms are not only high pixels. Everyone buys A7R and D800, but also high pixels. This year, Canon's 5DSR with half a billion pixels launched this year has not made much breakthrough in essence. It is just a simple increase in pixels. It does not feel much better than its 1DX image quality It's just a little bit, but it's still not comparable with others. It's not rational to simply pursue the pixel trend. It's better to play your own strengths and make more efforts to beautify the portrait. Make some small, light, good performance and simple operation beauty cameras

Ultra high pixels bring the highest resolution of the whole frame. With the latest generation of high-resolution focusing head, the frame system of the old generation (4 years ago) can be completely defeated in the studio shooting with sufficient light. The current price is also very friendly.

The disadvantage is that its purpose is too specific. Compared with sports shooting, activity shooting, video shooting and other aspects, it is not good enough. Compared with the new 1DX2 and 5D4, the low sense signal to noise ratio is also a notch lower (however, I think the signal to noise ratio is not so useful now. In addition to making your photo files larger and consuming more power, you rarely have the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of the signal to noise ratio....).

The first time I borrowed someone else's 5DsR to shoot an advertisement, it was equipped with Shima 50A. I was shocked by the appearance of the studio portraits. Every thread of the suit was so fine and clear (who said Canon took photos of Hu, really, you should change the lens. Even 24-70 ii studio photography and Shima 50A were Hu, and 5000W pixels were a touchstone), So I think the previous Feisi back and manual head can be eliminated (this pot is mainly based on the camera, but it is still possible to pretend). Recently, 5D3 came out. When I hesitated about 5D4 or sR, I finally chose sR. Now that I am doing business, I will go all the way to blackout.

High pixel, convenient cutting and fast focusing.

The feeling of high is too low. It's impossible to shoot at night. When the shutter is lowered, it's burnt. It's not as good as my 6D. Take a picture and store it for one or two seconds. The daytime raw is basically 60 or 70 megabytes, and the JPG is more than 11 megabytes.

High pixel means a lot, which is obviously provided to commercial photographers

The price is high, which is difficult for ordinary family users to accept

Super high pixels, excellent analytical power, good tolerance

At present, the high pixel camera in the SLR 135 camera exceeds some medium frame cameras

It would be better if the price could be lower

Super high pixels, amazing resolution, good tolerance

I specially upgraded the computer for its high pixel

High pixel requires high performance of memory card and computer

?

The perfect camera in my heart, but the pocket is too small

The camera price is too expensive. It would be better if it were cheaper

?

The details are too sharp, and the requirements for lens resolution are high

If you have to talk about shortcomings, it's a big weight

?