Community closure management, school closure, control of access to Beijing, and Beijing emergency response was upgraded from Level III to Level II. At the same time, Beijing has carried out nucleic acid testing for 356000 key people. More than 300000 people can "do everything they need to do", but also from the first patient of this round of epidemic in Beijing, "Uncle Xicheng", Mr. Tang, who clearly recalled his action trajectory, and can also be verified with big data. How important is this to the prevention and control of the epidemic? Wu Hao, an expert of the Disease Prevention and Control Expert Committee of the National Health Commission, gave a reading and highly praised the "master of Xicheng".
Mr. Tang's response to the epidemic is considered to have reached the "textbook" level. After finding that he has fever and other symptoms, he immediately rode to the nearby fever clinic to see a doctor, and wore a mask all the time. His strong awareness of prevention deserves praise. What's more, Mr. Tang can recall all the places he has visited since May 30, and clearly recall everyone he has contacted in the past two weeks, providing a detailed list of 38 people. In particular, Mr. Tang accurately described the event that he went to Xinfadi to buy seafood and made a short stay on June 3, which provided an important basis for relevant departments to lock in Xinfadi's market and respond quickly.
Without Mr. Tang's help, the relevant departments will finally get to the bottom of the epidemic. However, responding to the epidemic is a race against time. The longer it is delayed, the wider the scope of the epidemic and the greater the difficulty of prevention and control. Without Mr. Tang's precise description, it would be difficult to lock in the new market so quickly. Even if it only takes a day and a half, the current epidemic situation may be much worse. Mr. Tang has made a contribution to the prevention and control of the epidemic in Beijing, and has also set a civilian model for responding to the epidemic. The society should applaud him generously.
Some people may think that Mr. Tang's memory is so strong that he can't learn it. In fact, it is not the case. Whether personal epidemic prevention is good or bad, the awareness of epidemic prevention and sense of responsibility play a decisive role, and memory and other abilities only play an auxiliary role. Even if Mr. Tang has a poor memory, as long as his awareness of epidemic prevention and sense of responsibility are strong enough, he can take the initiative to name the key location of the new market, and the relevant departments can use big data on this basis, they can also achieve the same effect as the current. If everyone can treat the epidemic with a highly responsible attitude towards society, as Mr. Tang did, the prevention and control network can be very tight.
Reviewing the anti epidemic experience in recent months, we are more aware of the value of Mr. Tang's approach. It is not difficult for the public to actively report important whereabouts, actively cooperate with information collection, scan code and enter key places. However, it is often the people who conceal their contact history, who are able to cooperate but fail to cooperate with luck, that bring difficulties to the epidemic prevention and control work. Some cases of epidemic spread are mostly caused by someone concealing the epidemic situation. The comparison between the two shows the educational and exemplary significance of Mr. Tang as a model for civilians.
The "Big Master of Xicheng"'s response to the epidemic is not only worth learning, but also can strengthen our confidence in doing well in the normalization of epidemic prevention. After the epidemic, the public has generally been tested and tempered. This uncle's performance is not just an individual example. I believe that there are more than a few people like Uncle Tang who can respond to the epidemic correctly and quickly.
