Collection
zero Useful+1
zero

Policy adjustment

Terms in the field of political science
This entry is missing Overview , add relevant content to make the entry more complete, and it can also be upgraded quickly. Hurry up edit Come on!
Policy adjustment is a process in which policy makers, based on the feedback information from the conclusions of policy evaluation, make partial or complete changes to the content and form of policies. It is an indispensable and important link in the process of public policy, and is actually a continuation of the policy making process. The characteristics are: (1) Non zero starting point. The essence of policy adjustment is to coordinate the relationship between policy objectives, policy plans and policy environment, and eliminate tensions and contradictions among them. Policy adjustment is the re formulation and re implementation of policies. (2) Double optimization. After policy adjustment, the relationship between policy objectives and policy plans has been coordinated, and both have been optimized. [1]
Chinese name
Policy adjustment
Cause 1
Objective causes
Cause 2
Subjective cause
Role
All have interests
2. Contents of policy adjustment.
A: The redefinition of the question, the redefinition of the goal, and the reformulation of the plan also include the adjustment of the policy effectiveness, the subject and object of the policy.
3. What are the reasons for the policy adjustment?
(1) The objective reason refers to the development and change of social politics, economy and culture, that is, the development and change of policy environment and policy issues themselves.
(2) The subjective reason refers to the deepening of people's understanding of policy issues, policy programs, policy environment, etc.
4. The role of policy adjustment?
(1) It is conducive to ensuring scientific public policies.
(2) It is conducive to ensuring the authority and seriousness of public policies.
(3) It is conducive to maintaining the stability and consistency of public policies.
However, some of the policy resources already invested have been wasted to varying degrees; Discourage the enthusiasm of some of the public; Negative impact on the image of public institutions