Enough

Yes, that's all. thank you!

Not a good head, not fit for the fuselage

If you are shooting scenery, it is necessary to have the sense of deep space brought by super wide angle to express the grand scene effect.

16-35 is a great wide-angle lens. Unless you reject scenery photography, 24-120 can cope with most environments, and can be used as a hang up head. 85-18 is a very good portrait head. It can be said that this set has basically handled more than 90% of the scenes. Of course, if you want to fight birds, you need to add a telephoto, then you can do it according to your own situation

Why buy 16-35? Take pictures of the scenery Galaxy architecture?

Why not buy 14-24 directly? The price difference is not big. If you buy 14-24, you won't want to buy 16-35. When I bought 16-35, I still remember 14-24.

This is 810+14-24

Daily use is enough. Add it when you really need 16 to 35. Usually I shoot scenery, and seldom use 16 wide-angle. Basically, 24 terminals are enough. I prefer to use splicing to solve the problem of wide angle, so that the quality of connected films can be greatly improved. The use of super wide angle is usually only used when it is necessary to shoot buildings or scenery at a very low angle. Besides, it is difficult for you to shoot the starry sky in the wide angle of 16-35. I suggest you go to the wide angle. The wide angle version of Sima 15/1.8 is easier to use. The aperture is large, the distortion is small, and the imaging quality is quite good.